These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38345249)

  • 41. Lurking in the water: testing eDNA metabarcoding as a tool for ecosystem-wide parasite detection.
    Thomas LJ; Milotic M; Vaux F; Poulin R
    Parasitology; 2022 Feb; 149(2):261-269. PubMed ID: 34709144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Environmental DNA metabarcoding of lake fish communities reflects long-term data from established survey methods.
    Hänfling B; Lawson Handley L; Read DS; Hahn C; Li J; Nichols P; Blackman RC; Oliver A; Winfield IJ
    Mol Ecol; 2016 Jul; 25(13):3101-19. PubMed ID: 27095076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Assessing vertebrate biodiversity in a kelp forest ecosystem using environmental DNA.
    Port JA; O'Donnell JL; Romero-Maraccini OC; Leary PR; Litvin SY; Nickols KJ; Yamahara KM; Kelly RP
    Mol Ecol; 2016 Jan; 25(2):527-41. PubMed ID: 26586544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Molecular identity crisis: environmental DNA metabarcoding meets traditional taxonomy-assessing biodiversity and freshwater mussel populations (Unionidae) in Alabama.
    Hauck LL; Atkinson CL; Homyack JA; Penaluna BE; Mangum C; Coble AA; Nettles J; Thornton-Frost JE; Fix MJ
    PeerJ; 2023; 11():e15127. PubMed ID: 37033728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Capturing open ocean biodiversity: Comparing environmental DNA metabarcoding to the continuous plankton recorder.
    Suter L; Polanowski AM; Clarke LJ; Kitchener JA; Deagle BE
    Mol Ecol; 2021 Jul; 30(13):3140-3157. PubMed ID: 32767849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparative analysis of fish environmental DNA reveals higher sensitivity achieved through targeted sequence-based metabarcoding.
    McCarthy A; Rajabi H; McClenaghan B; Fahner NA; Porter E; Singer GAC; Hajibabaei M
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2023 Apr; 23(3):581-591. PubMed ID: 36366953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Environmental DNA analysis for macro-organisms: species distribution and more.
    Minamoto T
    DNA Res; 2022 May; 29(3):. PubMed ID: 35652724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Environmental DNA metabarcoding studies are critically affected by substrate selection.
    Koziol A; Stat M; Simpson T; Jarman S; DiBattista JD; Harvey ES; Marnane M; McDonald J; Bunce M
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Mar; 19(2):366-376. PubMed ID: 30485662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Airborne environmental DNA captures terrestrial vertebrate diversity in nature.
    Lynggaard C; Frøslev TG; Johnson MS; Olsen MT; Bohmann K
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2024 Jan; 24(1):e13840. PubMed ID: 37497670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Environmental DNA Metabarcoding: A Novel Method for Biodiversity Monitoring of Marine Fish Communities.
    Miya M
    Ann Rev Mar Sci; 2022 Jan; 14():161-185. PubMed ID: 34351788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Environmental DNA of insects and springtails from caves reveals complex processes of eDNA transfer in soils.
    Lunghi E; Valle B; Guerrieri A; Bonin A; Cianferoni F; Manenti R; Ficetola GF
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Jun; 826():154022. PubMed ID: 35202680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Toward an ecoregion scale evaluation of eDNA metabarcoding primers: A case study for the freshwater fish biodiversity of the Murray-Darling Basin (Australia).
    Bylemans J; Gleeson DM; Hardy CM; Furlan E
    Ecol Evol; 2018 Sep; 8(17):8697-8712. PubMed ID: 30271538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A validated protocol for eDNA-based monitoring of within-species genetic diversity in a pond-breeding amphibian.
    Zanovello L; Girardi M; Marchesini A; Galla G; Casari S; Micheletti D; Endrizzi S; Fedrigotti C; Pedrini P; Bertorelle G; Hauffe HC
    Sci Rep; 2023 Mar; 13(1):4346. PubMed ID: 36928612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Efficiency of eDNA and iDNA in assessing vertebrate diversity and its abundance.
    Carvalho CS; de Oliveira ME; Rodriguez-Castro KG; Saranholi BH; Galetti PM
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2022 May; 22(4):1262-1273. PubMed ID: 34724330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Accuracy, limitations and cost efficiency of eDNA-based community survey in tropical frogs.
    Bálint M; Nowak C; Márton O; Pauls SU; Wittwer C; Aramayo JL; Schulze A; Chambert T; Cocchiararo B; Jansen M
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2018 Nov; 18(6):1415-1426. PubMed ID: 30155977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Evaluating biodiversity for coral reef reformation and monitoring on complex 3D structures using environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding.
    Levy N; Simon-Blecher N; Ben-Ezra S; Yuval M; Doniger T; Leray M; Karako-Lampert S; Tarazi E; Levy O
    Sci Total Environ; 2023 Jan; 856(Pt 2):159051. PubMed ID: 36181819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Modeling the ecological status response of rivers to multiple stressors using machine learning: A comparison of environmental DNA metabarcoding and morphological data.
    Fan J; Wang S; Li H; Yan Z; Zhang Y; Zheng X; Wang P
    Water Res; 2020 Sep; 183():116004. PubMed ID: 32622231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effects of sampling strategies and DNA extraction methods on eDNA metabarcoding: A case study of estuarine fish diversity monitoring.
    Ruan HT; Wang RL; Li HT; Liu L; Kuang TX; Li M; Zou KS
    Zool Res; 2022 Mar; 43(2):192-204. PubMed ID: 35084125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Using vertebrate environmental DNA from seawater in biomonitoring of marine habitats.
    Sigsgaard EE; Torquato F; Frøslev TG; Moore ABM; Sørensen JM; Range P; Ben-Hamadou R; Bach SS; Møller PR; Thomsen PF
    Conserv Biol; 2020 Jun; 34(3):697-710. PubMed ID: 31729081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Assessing the utility of marine filter feeders for environmental DNA (eDNA) biodiversity monitoring.
    Jeunen GJ; Cane JS; Ferreira S; Strano F; von Ammon U; Cross H; Day R; Hesseltine S; Ellis K; Urban L; Pearson N; Olmedo-Rojas P; Kardailsky A; Gemmell NJ; Lamare M
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2023 May; 23(4):771-786. PubMed ID: 36598115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.