150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38345489)
21. Effect of Different Finishing and Polishing Systems on the Surface Roughness of Resin Composite and Enamel: An
Bansal K; Gupta S; Nikhil V; Jaiswal S; Jain A; Aggarwal N
Int J Appl Basic Med Res; 2019; 9(3):154-158. PubMed ID: 31392178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effect of different finishing and polishing agents on the surface roughness of cast pure titanium.
Reddy ES; Patil NP; Guttal SS; Jagadish HG
J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):263-8. PubMed ID: 17451480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A randomised controlled study on the use of finishing and polishing systems on different resin composites using 3D contact optical profilometry and scanning electron microscopy.
Daud A; Gray G; Lynch CD; Wilson NHF; Blum IR
J Dent; 2018 Apr; 71():25-30. PubMed ID: 29360492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effect of a continuous mechanical polishing protocol and toothbrushing on the surface roughness of acrylic resin teeth.
Guimarães GG; Sarte MF; Barreto JO; de Freitas-Pontes KM; Regis RR
Am J Dent; 2020 Aug; 33(4):187-190. PubMed ID: 32794392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of three systems for the polishing of an ultra-low fusing dental porcelain.
Wright MD; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Romberg E; Thompson GA; Runyan DA
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Nov; 92(5):486-90. PubMed ID: 15523338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effect of one-step polishing systems on surface roughness of different flowable restorative materials.
Ozel E; Korkmaz Y; Attar N; Karabulut E
Dent Mater J; 2008 Nov; 27(6):755-64. PubMed ID: 19241682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Conventional polishing techniques versus a nanofilled surface sealer: preliminary findings regarding surface roughness changes and analysis.
Jefferies SR; Boston DW
J Clin Dent; 2010; 21(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 20527508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Impact of air-polishing with erythritol on exposed root dentin: A randomized clinical trial.
Kruse AB; Burkhardt AS; Vach K; Hellwig E; Woelber JP; Schlueter N; Ratka-Krüger P
Int J Dent Hyg; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38852146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparative evaluation of enamel surface roughness after debonding using four finishing and polishing systems for residual resin removal-an in vitro study.
Shah P; Sharma P; Goje SK; Kanzariya N; Parikh M
Prog Orthod; 2019 May; 20(1):18. PubMed ID: 31056715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Performance of a novel polishing rubber wheel in improving surface roughness of feldspathic porcelain.
Han GJ; Kim JH; Lee MA; Chae SY; Lee YH; Cho BH
Dent Mater J; 2014; 33(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 25311335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effect of prophylactic polishing protocols on the surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials.
Neme AL; Frazier KB; Roeder LB; Debner TL
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 11817469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of root surface roughness produced by air polishing combined with hand instrumentation or ultrasonic instrumentation: an in vitro study.
Poornima R; Meena AK; Pratibha G
Gen Dent; 2019; 67(4):75-77. PubMed ID: 31355770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The effect of two polishing pastes on the surface roughness of bis-acryl composite and methacrylate-based resins.
Sen D; Göller G; Işsever H
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Nov; 88(5):527-32. PubMed ID: 12474004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Impact of air-polishing using erythritol on surface roughness and substance loss in dental hard tissue: An ex vivo study.
Kruse AB; Fortmeier S; Vach K; Hellwig E; Ratka-Krüger P; Schlueter N
PLoS One; 2024; 19(2):e0286672. PubMed ID: 38408064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effects of titanium brush on machined and sand-blasted/acid-etched titanium disc using confocal microscopy and contact profilometry.
Park JB; Jeon Y; Ko Y
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Feb; 26(2):130-6. PubMed ID: 24299063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effect of four different finishing and polishing systems on resin composites: roughness surface and gloss retention evaluations.
Tosco V; Monterubbianesi R; Orilisi G; Procaccini M; Grandini S; Putignano A; Orsini G
Minerva Stomatol; 2020 Aug; 69(4):207-214. PubMed ID: 31633320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Influence of polishing procedures on sonic scaling root surface roughness.
Leknes KN; Lie T
J Periodontol; 1991 Nov; 62(11):659-62. PubMed ID: 1753318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Atomic force microscopy analysis of enamel nanotopography after interproximal reduction.
Meredith L; Farella M; Lowrey S; Cannon RD; Mei L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Apr; 151(4):750-757. PubMed ID: 28364899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of various bulk-fill and nano-filled resin-based composites: An atomic force microscopy and scanning electron microscopy study.
Kılıç V; Gök A
Microsc Res Tech; 2021 Sep; 84(9):2058-2067. PubMed ID: 33772935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Surface roughness of various packable composites.
Ryba TM; Dunn WJ; Murchison DF
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):243-7. PubMed ID: 12022454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
