BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38345656)

  • 1. In Appreciation of the Maternal and Child Health Journal's Peer Reviewers, 2023.
    Matern Child Health J; 2024 Jan; 28(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 38345656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In Appreciation of the Maternal and Child Health Journal's Peer Reviewers, 2022.
    De Ver Dye T
    Matern Child Health J; 2023 Feb; 27(2):197-201. PubMed ID: 36710280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In Appreciation of the Maternal and Child Health Journal's Peer Reviewers, 2017.
    Matern Child Health J; 2018 Jan; 22(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 29302862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In Appreciation of the Maternal and Child Health Journal's Peer Reviewers, 2018.
    Matern Child Health J; 2019 Feb; 23(2):131-137. PubMed ID: 30767093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In Appreciation of the Maternal and Child Health Journal's Peer Reviewers, 2021.
    Matern Child Health J; 2022 Jan; 26(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 35000073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In Appreciation of the Maternal and Child Health Journal's Peer Reviewers, 2020.
    Matern Child Health J; 2021 Jan; 25(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 33428021
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Why do peer reviewers decline to review? A survey.
    Tite L; Schroter S
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2007 Jan; 61(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 17183008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do journals have a publication bias?
    Pickar JH
    Maturitas; 2007 May; 57(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 17376614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Role of supplementary material in biomedical journal articles: surveys of authors, reviewers and readers.
    Price A; Schroter S; Clarke M; McAneney H
    BMJ Open; 2018 Sep; 8(9):e021753. PubMed ID: 30249629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Experimental design and analysis and their reporting II: updated and simplified guidance for authors and peer reviewers.
    Curtis MJ; Alexander S; Cirino G; Docherty JR; George CH; Giembycz MA; Hoyer D; Insel PA; Izzo AA; Ji Y; MacEwan DJ; Sobey CG; Stanford SC; Teixeira MM; Wonnacott S; Ahluwalia A
    Br J Pharmacol; 2018 Apr; 175(7):987-993. PubMed ID: 29520785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Journal editors' perspectives on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in biomedical journals: a qualitative study.
    Glonti K; Boutron I; Moher D; Hren D
    BMJ Open; 2019 Nov; 9(11):e033421. PubMed ID: 31767597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Red Journal's Outstanding Reviewer Awards for 2014.
    Zietman AL
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Jun; 92(2):204-5. PubMed ID: 25968818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. New policies to consolidate the journal's hold on its latest position.
    Martelletti P
    J Headache Pain; 2009 Feb; 10(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 19093073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The journal's development since the introduction of online manuscript submission and the double blinded peer review of manuscripts].
    Göbel U; Gortner L
    Klin Padiatr; 2010 Jul; 222(4):231-3. PubMed ID: 20665364
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Subspecialty Influence on Scientific Peer Review for an Obstetrics and Gynecology Journal With a High Impact Factor.
    Parikh LI; Benner RS; Riggs TW; Hazen N; Chescheir NC
    Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 129(2):243-248. PubMed ID: 28079780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characteristics of peer reviewed clinical medicine journals.
    Eldredge J
    Med Ref Serv Q; 1999; 18(2):13-26. PubMed ID: 10557841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Your journal's methods of quality assurance through the process of refereeing.
    Duberley JD
    Nurs Ethics; 1995 Sep; 2(3):261-3. PubMed ID: 7583433
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of structured workshop training on subsequent performance of journal peer reviewers.
    Callaham ML; Schriger DL
    Ann Emerg Med; 2002 Sep; 40(3):323-8. PubMed ID: 12192358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nonfinancial conflict of interest in peer-review: Some notes for discussion.
    Radun I
    Account Res; 2023 Dec; 30(6):331-342. PubMed ID: 34615398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. CDR review's editorial process in 1997 and the introduction of blinded peer review prepare the way for Communicable Disease and Public Health.
    Handysides S; Goalen V; Soltanpoor N
    Commun Dis Public Health; 1998 Mar; 1(1):51-3. PubMed ID: 9718841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.