138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38346094)
1. A CNN-based denoising method trained with images acquired with electron density phantoms for thin-sliced coronary artery calcium scans.
Yang CC; Hou KY
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2024 Mar; 25(3):e14287. PubMed ID: 38346094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Investigating the Feasibility of Using DenseNet to Improve Coronary Calcification Detection in CT.
Hou KY; Yang CC
Acad Radiol; 2023 Aug; 30(8):1600-1613. PubMed ID: 36396585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improving the detection of hypo-vascular liver metastases in multiphase contrast-enhanced CT with slice thickness less than 5 mm using DenseNet.
Yang CC; Lin KW
Radiography (Lond); 2024 May; 30(3):759-769. PubMed ID: 38458104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimization of HU threshold for coronary artery calcium scans reconstructed at 0.5-mm slice thickness using iterative reconstruction.
Hou KY; Tsujioka K; Yang CC
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 21(2):111-120. PubMed ID: 31889419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance of a deep learning-based CT image denoising method: Generalizability over dose, reconstruction kernel, and slice thickness.
Zeng R; Lin CY; Li Q; Jiang L; Skopec M; Fessler JA; Myers KJ
Med Phys; 2022 Feb; 49(2):836-853. PubMed ID: 34954845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantifying lumen diameter in coronary artery stents with high-resolution photon counting detector CT and convolutional neural network denoising.
Koons EK; Thorne JE; Huber NR; Chang S; Rajendran K; McCollough CH; Leng S
Med Phys; 2023 Jul; 50(7):4173-4181. PubMed ID: 37069830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A performance comparison of convolutional neural network-based image denoising methods: The effect of loss functions on low-dose CT images.
Kim B; Han M; Shim H; Baek J
Med Phys; 2019 Sep; 46(9):3906-3923. PubMed ID: 31306488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improved coronary calcium detection and quantification with low-dose full field-of-view photon-counting CT: a phantom study.
van der Werf NR; Rodesch PA; Si-Mohamed S; van Hamersvelt RW; Greuter MJW; Leiner T; Boussel L; Willemink MJ; Douek P
Eur Radiol; 2022 May; 32(5):3447-3457. PubMed ID: 34997284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Technical note: Phantom-based training framework for convolutional neural network CT noise reduction.
Huber NR; Missert AD; Gong H; Leng S; Yu L; McCollough CH
Med Phys; 2023 Feb; 50(2):821-830. PubMed ID: 36385704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Noise reduction in CT image using prior knowledge aware iterative denoising.
Tao S; Rajendran K; Zhou W; Fletcher JG; McCollough CH; Leng S
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Nov; 65(22):. PubMed ID: 33065559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Denoising diffusion weighted imaging data using convolutional neural networks.
Cheng H; Vinci-Booher S; Wang J; Caron B; Wen Q; Newman S; Pestilli F
PLoS One; 2022; 17(9):e0274396. PubMed ID: 36108272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dose reduction and image enhancement in micro-CT using deep learning.
Muller FM; Maebe J; Vanhove C; Vandenberghe S
Med Phys; 2023 Sep; 50(9):5643-5656. PubMed ID: 36994779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Coronary calcium scoring potential of large field-of-view spectral photon-counting CT: a phantom study.
van der Werf NR; Si-Mohamed S; Rodesch PA; van Hamersvelt RW; Greuter MJW; Boccalini S; Greffier J; Leiner T; Boussel L; Willemink MJ; Douek P
Eur Radiol; 2022 Jan; 32(1):152-162. PubMed ID: 34255159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating a Convolutional Neural Network Noise Reduction Method When Applied to CT Images Reconstructed Differently Than Training Data.
Huber NR; Missert AD; Yu L; Leng S; McCollough CH
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2021 Jul-Aug 01; 45(4):544-551. PubMed ID: 34519453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pediatric evaluations for deep learning CT denoising.
Nelson BJ; Kc P; Badal A; Jiang L; Masters SC; Zeng R
Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 51(2):978-990. PubMed ID: 38127330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative analysis of small coronary artery calcium detectability with an accurate simulation and validation on a clinical CT scanner.
Severance LM; Pack JD; Contijoch FJ; McVeigh ER
Med Phys; 2023 Oct; 50(10):6060-6070. PubMed ID: 37523236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An unsupervised two-step training framework for low-dose computed tomography denoising.
Kim W; Lee J; Choi JH
Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 51(2):1127-1144. PubMed ID: 37432026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adaptive nonlocal means filtering based on local noise level for CT denoising.
Li Z; Yu L; Trzasko JD; Lake DS; Blezek DJ; Fletcher JG; McCollough CH; Manduca A
Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 41(1):011908. PubMed ID: 24387516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rapid 2D
Baker RR; Muthurangu V; Rega M; Walsh SB; Steeden JA
Magn Reson Imaging; 2024 Jul; 110():184-194. PubMed ID: 38642779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of heart rate, slice thickness, and calcification density on calcium scores using 64-slice multidetector computed tomography: a systematic phantom study.
Groen JM; Greuter MJ; Schmidt B; Suess C; Vliegenthart R; Oudkerk M
Invest Radiol; 2007 Dec; 42(12):848-55. PubMed ID: 18007157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
