152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38346963)
21. Prediction of prognosis in elderly patients with sepsis based on machine learning (random survival forest).
Zhang L; Huang T; Xu F; Li S; Zheng S; Lyu J; Yin H
BMC Emerg Med; 2022 Feb; 22(1):26. PubMed ID: 35148680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Individual risk prediction: Comparing random forests with Cox proportional-hazards model by a simulation study.
Baralou V; Kalpourtzi N; Touloumi G
Biom J; 2023 Aug; 65(6):e2100380. PubMed ID: 36169048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Machine learning methods for accurately predicting survival and guiding treatment in stage I and II hepatocellular carcinoma.
Li X; Bao H; Shi Y; Zhu W; Peng Z; Yan L; Chen J; Shu X
Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Nov; 102(45):e35892. PubMed ID: 37960763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Predicting the Risk of Posttraumatic Osteoarthritis After Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Machine Learning Time-to-Event Analysis.
Lu Y; Reinholz AK; Till SE; Kalina SV; Saris DBF; Camp CL; Stuart MJ
Am J Sports Med; 2023 Jun; 51(7):1673-1685. PubMed ID: 37171158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Bioinformatics analysis reveals immune prognostic markers for overall survival of colorectal cancer patients: a novel machine learning survival predictive system.
Zhang Z; Huang L; Li J; Wang P
BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Apr; 23(1):124. PubMed ID: 35395711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Development of a machine learning model to predict early recurrence for hepatocellular carcinoma after curative resection.
Zeng J; Zeng J; Lin K; Lin H; Wu Q; Guo P; Zhou W; Liu J
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr; 2022 Apr; 11(2):176-187. PubMed ID: 35464276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Prediction of lung papillary adenocarcinoma-specific survival using ensemble machine learning models.
Xia K; Chen D; Jin S; Yi X; Luo L
Sci Rep; 2023 Sep; 13(1):14827. PubMed ID: 37684259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Machine learning-based prediction of 1-year mortality for acute coronary syndrome
Hadanny A; Shouval R; Wu J; Gale CP; Unger R; Zahger D; Gottlieb S; Matetzky S; Goldenberg I; Beigel R; Iakobishvili Z
J Cardiol; 2022 Mar; 79(3):342-351. PubMed ID: 34857429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Machine learning for optimized individual survival prediction in resectable upper gastrointestinal cancer.
Jung JO; Crnovrsanin N; Wirsik NM; Nienhüser H; Peters L; Popp F; Schulze A; Wagner M; Müller-Stich BP; Büchler MW; Schmidt T
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2023 May; 149(5):1691-1702. PubMed ID: 35616729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparing machine learning approaches to incorporate time-varying covariates in predicting cancer survival time.
Cygu S; Seow H; Dushoff J; Bolker BM
Sci Rep; 2023 Jan; 13(1):1370. PubMed ID: 36697455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A comparison of time to event analysis methods, using weight status and breast cancer as a case study.
Aivaliotis G; Palczewski J; Atkinson R; Cade JE; Morris MA
Sci Rep; 2021 Jul; 11(1):14058. PubMed ID: 34234154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Factors affecting the survival of patients with colorectal cancer using random survival forest.
Roshanaei G; Safari M; Faradmal J; Abbasi M; Khazaei S
J Gastrointest Cancer; 2022 Mar; 53(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 33174117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Development of machine learning prognostic models for overall survival of prostate cancer patients with lymph node-positive.
Peng ZH; Tian JH; Chen BH; Zhou HB; Bi H; He MX; Li MR; Zheng XY; Wang YW; Chong T; Li ZL
Sci Rep; 2023 Oct; 13(1):18424. PubMed ID: 37891423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Predictors of colorectal cancer survival using cox regression and random survival forests models based on gene expression data.
Mohammed M; Mboya IB; Mwambi H; Elbashir MK; Omolo B
PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0261625. PubMed ID: 34965262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Predicting Survival in Veterans with Follicular Lymphoma Using Structured Electronic Health Record Information and Machine Learning.
Li C; Patil V; Rasmussen KM; Yong C; Chien HC; Morreall D; Humpherys J; Sauer BC; Burningham Z; Halwani AS
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Mar; 18(5):. PubMed ID: 33799968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Study on the prediction model of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in the rural Xinjiang population based on survival analysis.
Qian X; Keerman M; Zhang X; Guo H; He J; Maimaitijiang R; Wang X; Ma J; Li Y; Ma R; Guo S
BMC Public Health; 2023 Jun; 23(1):1041. PubMed ID: 37264356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Can Predictive Modeling Tools Identify Patients at High Risk of Prolonged Opioid Use After ACL Reconstruction?
Anderson AB; Grazal CF; Balazs GC; Potter BK; Dickens JF; Forsberg JA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Jul; 478(7):0-1618. PubMed ID: 32282466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Individual mortality risk predictive system of patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure based on a random survival forest model.
Zhang ZQ; He G; Luo ZW; Cheng CC; Wang P; Li J; Zhu MG; Ming L; He TS; Ouyang YL; Huang YY; Wu XL; Ye YN
Chin Med J (Engl); 2021 Jun; 134(14):1701-1708. PubMed ID: 34133353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A Machine Learning-Based Model to Predict Survival After Transarterial Chemoembolization for BCLC Stage B Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Lin H; Zeng L; Yang J; Hu W; Zhu Y
Front Oncol; 2021; 11():608260. PubMed ID: 33738252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
