128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38347207)
1. China conducts first nationwide review of retractions and research misconduct.
Mallapaty S
Nature; 2024 Feb; 626(8000):700-701. PubMed ID: 38347207
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Mistakes and misconduct in the research literature: retractions just the tip of the iceberg.
Poulton A
Med J Aust; 2007 Mar; 186(6):323-4. PubMed ID: 17371220
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Retractions in the research literature: misconduct or mistakes?
Nath SB; Marcus SC; Druss BG
Med J Aust; 2006 Aug; 185(3):152-4. PubMed ID: 16893357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Retraction policies of top scientific journals ranked by impact factor.
Resnik DB; Wager E; Kissling GE
J Med Libr Assoc; 2015 Jul; 103(3):136-9. PubMed ID: 26213505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Retractions' realities.
Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6927):1. PubMed ID: 12621394
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Retractions of scientific publications: responsibility and accountability.
Katavić V
Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2014; 24(2):217-22. PubMed ID: 24969915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Scientific misconduct. Retractions put spotlight on China's part-time professor system.
Xin H
Science; 2009 Mar; 323(5919):1280-1. PubMed ID: 19264995
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing?
Steen RG
J Med Ethics; 2011 Apr; 37(4):249-53. PubMed ID: 21186208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The landscape of urological retractions: the prevalence of reported research misconduct.
Mena JD; Ndoye M; Cohen AJ; Kamal P; Breyer BN
BJU Int; 2019 Jul; 124(1):174-179. PubMed ID: 30748082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Publication rates after the first retraction for biomedical researchers with multiple retracted publications.
Mistry V; Grey A; Bolland MJ
Account Res; 2019 Jul; 26(5):277-287. PubMed ID: 31025884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Misconduct as the main cause for retraction. A descriptive study of retracted publications and their authors.
Campos-Varela I; Ruano-Raviña A
Gac Sanit; 2019; 33(4):356-360. PubMed ID: 29776690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 'Avalanche' of spider-paper retractions shakes behavioural-ecology community.
Viglione G
Nature; 2020 Feb; 578(7794):199-200. PubMed ID: 32047306
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications.
Fang FC; Steen RG; Casadevall A
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2012 Oct; 109(42):17028-33. PubMed ID: 23027971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Peer-Review Fraud--Hacking the Scientific Publication Process.
Haug CJ
N Engl J Med; 2015 Dec; 373(25):2393-5. PubMed ID: 26488392
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparative analysis of retracted papers in Health Sciences from China and India.
Palla IA; Singson M; Thiyagarajan S
Account Res; 2020 Oct; 27(7):401-416. PubMed ID: 32279538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Repeating probability of authors with retracted scientific publications.
Kuroki T; Ukawa A
Account Res; 2018; 25(4):212-219. PubMed ID: 29519161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomedical paper retractions have quadrupled in 20 years - why?
Else H
Nature; 2024 Jun; 630(8016):280-281. PubMed ID: 38822109
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Dana-Farber retractions: meet the blogger who spotted problems in dozens of cancer papers.
Kozlov M
Nature; 2024 Feb; 626(7997):16-17. PubMed ID: 38267558
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Characteristics of Retractions from Korean Medical Journals in the KoreaMed Database: A Bibliometric Analysis.
Huh S; Kim SY; Cho HM
PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0163588. PubMed ID: 27706245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Science publishing: The trouble with retractions.
Van Noorden R
Nature; 2011 Oct; 478(7367):26-8. PubMed ID: 21979026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
