These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

57 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38347317)

  • 1. Comparison of the effectiveness of microsatellites and SNP panels for genetic identification, traceability and assessment of parentage in an inbred Angus herd.
    Fernández ME; Goszczynski DE; Lirón JP; Villegas-Castagnasso EE; Carino MH; Ripoli MV; Rogberg-Muñoz A; Posik DM; Peral-García P; Giovambattista G
    Genet Mol Biol; 2013 Jul; 36(2):185-91. PubMed ID: 23885200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Single nucleotide polymorphisms for parentage testing of horse breeds in Korea.
    Lee SY; Kim SM; Oyungerel B; Cho GJ
    Anim Biosci; 2024 Apr; 37(4):600-608. PubMed ID: 37905321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A novel approach of kinship determination based on the physical length of genetically shared regions of chromosomes.
    Cho S; Shin E; Park YG; Choi SH; Choe EK; Bae JH; Lee JE; Lee SD
    Genes Genomics; 2024 May; 46(5):577-587. PubMed ID: 38180716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Application of a newly constructed NGS panel with 45 X-linked microhaplotypes demonstrates the unique value of X-MH for kinship testing and mixture analysis.
    Ma G; Liu K; Lu C; Du Q; Zhang M; Wang Q; Fu G; Wang J; Ma C; Cong B; Li S; Fu L
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2024 Jun; 72():103091. PubMed ID: 38955053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Unveiling facial kinship: The BioKinVis dataset for facial kinship verification and genetic association studies.
    Yu J; Jin X; Du W; Bai Y; Zhou X; Gao M; Li S; Qin J; Chen X; Liu Y; Yu J; Chen C; Xie Q; Xie S; Kong X; Zhan W; Yu Y; Li K; Ji Q; Chen F; Chen P
    Electrophoresis; 2024 May; 45(9-10):794-804. PubMed ID: 38161244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. SNPs and STRs in forensic medicine. A strategy for kinship evaluation.
    Pontes L; Sousa JC; Medeiros R
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2017; 67(3):226-240. PubMed ID: 29460612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The future of parentage analysis: From microsatellites to SNPs and beyond.
    Flanagan SP; Jones AG
    Mol Ecol; 2019 Feb; 28(3):544-567. PubMed ID: 30575167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Identification of the efficacy of parentage testing based on bi-allelic autosomal single nucleotide polymorphism markers in Taiwanese population.
    Chen YC; Lin WD; Liu TY; Tsai FJ
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38347317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [A study on paternity testing with 96 autosomal SNPs].
    Lee L; Wang L; Feng QC; Zhu YL; Cheng XL; Kong XD; Huang YM; Wang WF; Zeng ZS
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Feb; 29(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 22311487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the effectiveness of single nucleotide polymorphisms compared to microsatellite markers for parentage verification in Moroccan horses.
    Aminou O; Badaoui B; Machmoum M; Piro M
    Anim Genet; 2024 Jun; 55(3):404-409. PubMed ID: 38383954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fourteen non-CODIS autosomal short tandem repeat loci multiplex data from Taiwanese.
    Hwa HL; Chang YY; Lee JC; Yin HY; Tseng LH; Su YN; Ko TM
    Int J Legal Med; 2011 Mar; 125(2):219-26. PubMed ID: 20809099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Forensic application of a novel MPS-based panel (90 STRs and 100 SNPs) in a non-exclusion parentage case with three autosomal STRs incompatibilities.
    Wu JZ; Wang LX; Yang XY; Pan DH; Lu XY; Liu CH; Han XL; Liu H; Shi MS; Liu C; Wen SQ
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2022 Feb; 54():101987. PubMed ID: 34768042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A 472-SNP panel for pairwise kinship testing of second-degree relatives.
    Mo SK; Ren ZL; Yang YR; Liu YC; Zhang JJ; Wu HJ; Li Z; Bo XC; Wang SQ; Yan JW; Ni M
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 May; 34():178-185. PubMed ID: 29510334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of multiple imputation algorithms and verification using whole-genome sequencing in the CMUH genetic biobank.
    Liu TY; Lin CF; Wu HT; Wu YL; Chen YC; Liao CC; Chou YP; Chao D; Chang YS; Lu HF; Chang JG; Hsu KC; Tsai FJ
    Biomedicine (Taipei); 2021; 11(4):57-65. PubMed ID: 35223420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.