128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38347344)
1. Meta-lasso: new insight on infection prediction after minimally invasive surgery.
Cheng Y; Tang Q; Li X; Ma L; Yuan J; Hou X
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2024 Jun; 62(6):1703-1715. PubMed ID: 38347344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Machine learning applications for the prediction of surgical site infection in neurological operations.
Tunthanathip T; Sae-Heng S; Oearsakul T; Sakarunchai I; Kaewborisutsakul A; Taweesomboonyat C
Neurosurg Focus; 2019 Aug; 47(2):E7. PubMed ID: 31370028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Using Preoperative and Intraoperative Factors to Predict the Risk of Surgical Site Infections After Lumbar Spinal Surgery: A Machine Learning-Based Study.
Liu WC; Ying H; Liao WJ; Li MP; Zhang Y; Luo K; Sun BL; Liu ZL; Liu JM
World Neurosurg; 2022 Jun; 162():e553-e560. PubMed ID: 35318153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Construct validation of machine learning for accurately predicting the risk of postoperative surgical site infection following spine surgery.
Zhang Q; Chen G; Zhu Q; Liu Z; Li Y; Li R; Zhao T; Liu X; Zhu Y; Zhang Z; Li H
J Hosp Infect; 2024 Apr; 146():232-241. PubMed ID: 38029857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Develop a radiomics-based machine learning model to predict the stone-free rate post-percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
Zou XC; Luo CW; Yuan RM; Jin MN; Zeng T; Chao HC
Urolithiasis; 2024 Apr; 52(1):64. PubMed ID: 38613668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Machine-learning models for predicting surgical site infections using patient pre-operative risk and surgical procedure factors.
Mamlook REA; Wells LJ; Sawyer R
Am J Infect Control; 2023 May; 51(5):544-550. PubMed ID: 36002080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can Machine Learning Algorithms Predict Which Patients Will Achieve Minimally Clinically Important Differences From Total Joint Arthroplasty?
Fontana MA; Lyman S; Sarker GK; Padgett DE; MacLean CH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Jun; 477(6):1267-1279. PubMed ID: 31094833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Prognostic Model of Surgical Site Infection Using Daily Clinical Wound Assessment.
Sanger PC; van Ramshorst GH; Mercan E; Huang S; Hartzler AL; Armstrong CA; Lordon RJ; Lober WB; Evans HL
J Am Coll Surg; 2016 Aug; 223(2):259-270.e2. PubMed ID: 27188832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development and Internal Validation of Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting the Risk of Surgical Site Infection Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
Wang H; Fan T; Yang B; Lin Q; Li W; Yang M
Front Med (Lausanne); 2021; 8():771608. PubMed ID: 34988091
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Development of a Nomogram for Predicting Surgical Site Infection in Patients with Resected Lung Neoplasm Undergoing Minimally Invasive Surgery.
Cheng Y; Chen Y; Hou X; Yu J; Wen H; Dai J; Zheng Y
Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2022 Oct; 23(8):754-762. PubMed ID: 36149679
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Machine learning approaches for prediction of early death among lung cancer patients with bone metastases using routine clinical characteristics: An analysis of 19,887 patients.
Cui Y; Shi X; Wang S; Qin Y; Wang B; Che X; Lei M
Front Public Health; 2022; 10():1019168. PubMed ID: 36276398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Machine learning-based models for the prediction of breast cancer recurrence risk.
Zuo D; Yang L; Jin Y; Qi H; Liu Y; Ren L
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2023 Nov; 23(1):276. PubMed ID: 38031071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predicting the occurrence of surgical site infections using text mining and machine learning.
da Silva DA; Ten Caten CS; Dos Santos RP; Fogliatto FS; Hsuan J
PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0226272. PubMed ID: 31834905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Construction of a predictive model for radiation proctitis after radiotherapy for female pelvic tumors based on machine learning.
Xie H; Gong M; Zhang J; Li Q
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2022 Aug; 47(8):1065-1074. PubMed ID: 36097774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Machine learning application for prediction of surgical site infection after posterior cervical surgery.
Lu K; Tu Y; Su S; Ding J; Hou X; Dong C; Jin H; Gao W
Int Wound J; 2024 Apr; 21(4):e14607. PubMed ID: 38155433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing machine learning algorithms to predict COVID‑19 mortality using a dataset including chest computed tomography severity score data.
Zakariaee SS; Naderi N; Ebrahimi M; Kazemi-Arpanahi H
Sci Rep; 2023 Jul; 13(1):11343. PubMed ID: 37443373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimizing prognostic factors of five-year survival in gastric cancer patients using feature selection techniques with machine learning algorithms: a comparative study.
Afrash MR; Mirbagheri E; Mashoufi M; Kazemi-Arpanahi H
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2023 Apr; 23(1):54. PubMed ID: 37024885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Surgical site infection in women undergoing surgery for gynecologic cancer.
Mahdi H; Gojayev A; Buechel M; Knight J; SanMarco J; Lockhart D; Michener C; Moslemi-Kebria M
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 May; 24(4):779-86. PubMed ID: 24681712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hospital mortality prediction in traumatic injuries patients: comparing different SMOTE-based machine learning algorithms.
Hassanzadeh R; Farhadian M; Rafieemehr H
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Apr; 23(1):101. PubMed ID: 37087425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance assessment of the metastatic spinal tumor frailty index using machine learning algorithms: limitations and future directions.
Massaad E; Williams N; Hadzipasic M; Patel SS; Fourman MS; Kiapour A; Schoenfeld AJ; Shankar GM; Shin JH
Neurosurg Focus; 2021 May; 50(5):E5. PubMed ID: 33932935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
