144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38348547)
1. Can nerve monitoring during radical prostatectomy improve functional outcomes? A randomised trial.
Nolsøe AB; Østergren PB; Jakobsen H; Jensen CFS; Bruun NH; Sønksen J; Fode M
BJU Int; 2024 Jun; 133(6):742-751. PubMed ID: 38348547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Impact of the Retzius-sparing Approach on Early Urinary Continence Recovery After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
Dalela D; Jeong W; Prasad MA; Sood A; Abdollah F; Diaz M; Karabon P; Sammon J; Jamil M; Baize B; Simone A; Menon M
Eur Urol; 2017 Nov; 72(5):677-685. PubMed ID: 28483330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Retzius-sparing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Leads to Durable Improvement in Urinary Function and Quality of Life Versus Standard Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Without Compromise on Oncologic Efficacy: Single-surgeon Series and Step-by-step Guide.
Egan J; Marhamati S; Carvalho FLF; Davis M; O'Neill J; Lee H; Lynch JH; Hankins RA; Hu JC; Kowalczyk KJ
Eur Urol; 2021 Jun; 79(6):839-857. PubMed ID: 32536488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nerve-sparing in salvage robot-assisted prostatectomy: surgical technique, oncological and functional outcomes at a single high-volume institution.
Bonet X; Ogaya-Pinies G; Woodlief T; Hernandez-Cardona E; Ganapathi H; Rogers T; Coelho RF; Rocco B; Vigués F; Patel V
BJU Int; 2018 Nov; 122(5):837-844. PubMed ID: 30126045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative Outcomes of Salvage Retzius-Sparing versus Standard Robotic Prostatectomy: An International, Multi-Surgeon Series.
Kowalczyk KJ; Madi RH; Eden CG; Sooriakumaran P; Fransis K; Raskin Y; Joniau S; Johnson S; Jacobsohn K; Galfano A; Bocciardi AM; Hwang J; Kim IY; Hu JC
J Urol; 2021 Nov; 206(5):1184-1191. PubMed ID: 34181471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How to optimize patient selection for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: functional outcome analyses from a tertiary referral center.
Gandaglia G; Suardi N; Gallina A; Zaffuto E; Cucchiara V; Vizziello D; Shariat S; Cantiello F; Damiano R; Guazzoni G; Montorsi F; Briganti A
J Endourol; 2014 Jul; 28(7):792-800. PubMed ID: 24660774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Postoperative functional and cancer control evaluation of conventional and Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Comparison of selected cases by propensity score matching.
Kadono Y; Nohara T; Kawaguchi S; Kadomoto S; Iwamoto H; Yaegashi H; Iijima M; Shigehara K; Izumi K; Mizokami A
Prostate; 2023 Jun; 83(8):773-780. PubMed ID: 36879364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Randomised comparison of techniques for control of the dorsal venous complex during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Feng T; Heulitt G; Lee JJ; Liao M; Li HF; Porter JR
BJU Int; 2020 Nov; 126(5):586-594. PubMed ID: 32521115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparison of functional outcomes after retropubic and robot-assisted radical nerve-sparing prostatectomy conducted by surgeons with total caseloads of over 1000 prostatectomies].
Pushkar DY; Dyakov VV; Vasilyev AO; Kotenko DV
Urologiia; 2017 Apr; (1):50-53. PubMed ID: 28394523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Significance of erection hardness score as a diagnostic tool to assess erectile function recovery in Japanese men after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Miyake H; Miyazaki A; Yao A; Hinata N; Fujisawa M
J Robot Surg; 2016 Sep; 10(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 26994775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. NeuroSAFE PROOF: study protocol for a single-blinded, IDEAL stage 3, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial of NeuroSAFE robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus standard robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in men with localized prostate cancer.
Dinneen E; Grierson J; Almeida-Magana R; Clow R; Haider A; Allen C; Heffernan-Ho D; Freeman A; Briggs T; Nathan S; Mallett S; Brew-Graves C; Muirhead N; Williams NR; Pizzo E; Persad R; Aning J; Johnson L; Oxley J; Oakley N; Morgan S; Tahir F; Ahmad I; Dutto L; Salmond JM; Kelkar A; Kelly J; Shaw G
Trials; 2022 Jul; 23(1):584. PubMed ID: 35869497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bilateral nerve sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy is associated with faster continence recovery but not with erectile function recovery compared with retropubic open prostatectomy: the need for accurate selection of patients.
Ludovico GM; Dachille G; Pagliarulo G; D'Elia C; Mondaini N; Gacci M; Detti B; Malossini G; Bartoletti R; Cai T
Oncol Rep; 2013 Jun; 29(6):2445-50. PubMed ID: 23545628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of postoperative urinary continence and incontinence types between conventional and Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Kadono Y; Nohara T; Kawaguchi S; Makino T; Naito R; Kadomoto S; Iwamoto H; Yaegashi H; Shigehara K; Izumi K; Mizokami A
Neurourol Urodyn; 2023 Aug; 42(6):1411-1420. PubMed ID: 37096807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Advanced Reconstruction of Vesicourethral Support (ARVUS) during Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: One-year Functional Outcomes in a Two-group Randomised Controlled Trial.
Student V; Vidlar A; Grepl M; Hartmann I; Buresova E; Student V
Eur Urol; 2017 May; 71(5):822-830. PubMed ID: 27283216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of preoperative factors including urodynamic evaluations and nerve-sparing status for predicting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Nerve-sparing technique contributes to the reduction of postprostatectomy incontinence.
Kadono Y; Ueno S; Kadomoto S; Iwamoto H; Takezawa Y; Nakashima K; Nohara T; Izumi K; Mizokami A; Gabata T; Namiki M
Neurourol Urodyn; 2016 Nov; 35(8):1034-1039. PubMed ID: 26352154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Retzius-sparing versus standard robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer.
Rosenberg JE; Jung JH; Edgerton Z; Lee H; Lee S; Bakker CJ; Dahm P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Aug; 8(8):CD013641. PubMed ID: 32813279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A prediction model relating the extent of intraoperative fascia preservation to erectile dysfunction after nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
KleinJan GH; Sikorska K; Korne CM; Brouwer OR; Buckle T; Tillier C; van der Roest RCM; de Jong J; van Leeuwen FWB; van der Poel HG
J Robot Surg; 2019 Jun; 13(3):455-462. PubMed ID: 30178300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Early recovery of urinary continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy is associated with membranous urethra and neurovascular bundle preservation.
Ando S; Sugihara T; Hinotsu S; Kishino H; Hirata D; Watanabe R; Yanase A; Yokoyama H; Hoshina H; Endo K; Kamei J; Takaoka E; Fujimura T
Int J Urol; 2024 May; 31(5):492-499. PubMed ID: 38196247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of Early Dorsal Venous Complex Ligation on Urinary Continence Recovery after Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Results from a Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trial.
Bravi CA; Gandaglia G; Mazzone E; Fossati N; Gallina A; Stabile A; Scuderi S; Barletta F; Nocera L; Rosiello G; Martini A; Pellegrino F; Cucchiara V; Dehò F; Capitanio U; Scattoni V; Salonia A; Briganti A; Montorsi F
Eur Urol Focus; 2023 Jan; 9(1):83-88. PubMed ID: 36154808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Current status of various neurovascular bundle-sparing techniques in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Kumar A; Tandon S; Samavedi S; Mouraviev V; Bates AS; Patel VR
J Robot Surg; 2016 Sep; 10(3):187-200. PubMed ID: 27251473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
