121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38348927)
1. Development of the quantitative PET prostate phantom (Q3P) for improved quality assurance of
Fedrigo R; Coope R; Rahmim A; Bénard F; Uribe CF
Med Phys; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38348927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative evaluation of PSMA PET imaging using a realistic anthropomorphic phantom and shell-less radioactive epoxy lesions.
Fedrigo R; Kadrmas DJ; Edem PE; Fougner L; Klyuzhin IS; Petric MP; Bénard F; Rahmim A; Uribe C
EJNMMI Phys; 2022 Jan; 9(1):2. PubMed ID: 35032234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of scanner harmonization on PET-based treatment response assessment in metastatic melanoma.
Weisman AJ; Bradshaw TJ; Namias M; Jeraj R
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 65(22):225003. PubMed ID: 32906111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A NIM PET/CT phantom for evaluating the PET image quality of micro-lesions and the performance parameters of CT.
Lu S; Zhang P; Li C; Sun J; Liu W; Zhang P
BMC Med Imaging; 2021 Nov; 21(1):165. PubMed ID: 34749660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the Accuracy of Standardized Uptake Values of
Tlostanova MS; Chipiga LA
Sovrem Tekhnologii Med; 2021; 13(3):15-23. PubMed ID: 34603751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reduction of emission time for [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/CT using the digital biograph vision: a phantom study.
Fragoso Costa P; Jentzen W; SÜßELBECK F; Fendler WP; Rischpler C; Herrmann K; Conti M; Kersting D; Weber M
Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Mar; 67(1):57-68. PubMed ID: 34309334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Variability in PET image quality and quantification measured with a permanently filled
Sipilä O; Liukkonen J; Halme HL; Tolvanen T; Sohlberg A; Hakulinen M; Manninen AL; Tahvanainen K; Tunninen V; Ollikainen T; Kangasmaa T; Kangasmäki A; Vuorela J
EJNMMI Phys; 2023 Jun; 10(1):38. PubMed ID: 37322376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Repeatability of
Pfaehler E; Beukinga RJ; de Jong JR; Slart RHJA; Slump CH; Dierckx RAJO; Boellaard R
Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):665-678. PubMed ID: 30506687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Automated model-based quantitative analysis of phantoms with spherical inserts in FDG PET scans.
Ulrich EJ; Sunderland JJ; Smith BJ; Mohiuddin I; Parkhurst J; Plichta KA; Buatti JM; Beichel RR
Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 45(1):258-276. PubMed ID: 29091269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multicenter quantitative
Vosoughi H; Momennezhad M; Emami F; Hajizadeh M; Rahmim A; Geramifar P
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2023 Apr; 13(4):2218-2233. PubMed ID: 37064407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. (90)Y -PET imaging: Exploring limitations and accuracy under conditions of low counts and high random fraction.
Carlier T; Willowson KP; Fourkal E; Bailey DL; Doss M; Conti M
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4295-309. PubMed ID: 26133627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detection of sub-centimeter lesions using digital TOF-PET/CT system combined with Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm.
Miwa K; Wagatsuma K; Nemoto R; Masubuchi M; Kamitaka Y; Yamao T; Hiratsuka S; Yamaguchi M; Yoshii T; Kobayashi R; Miyaji N; Ishii K
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Oct; 34(10):762-771. PubMed ID: 32623569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. SUV Harmonization Between Different Hybrid PET/CT Systems.
Rubello D; Colletti PM
Clin Nucl Med; 2018 Nov; 43(11):811-814. PubMed ID: 30199381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prospective Comparison of PET Imaging with PSMA-Targeted
Rowe SP; Li X; Trock BJ; Werner RA; Frey S; DiGianvittorio M; Bleiler JK; Reyes DK; Abdallah R; Pienta KJ; Gorin MA; Pomper MG
J Nucl Med; 2020 Feb; 61(2):183-188. PubMed ID: 31451492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of the Noise Penalty Factor on Quantification in Bayesian Penalized Likelihood (Q.Clear) Reconstructions of
Rijnsdorp S; Roef MJ; Arends AJ
Diagnostics (Basel); 2021 May; 11(5):. PubMed ID: 34066854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of phantom-based harmonization for patient harmonization.
Panetta JV; Daube-Witherspoon ME; Karp JS
Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 44(7):3534-3544. PubMed ID: 28464372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Prospective Comparison of
Anttinen M; Ettala O; Malaspina S; Jambor I; Sandell M; Kajander S; Rinta-Kiikka I; Schildt J; Saukko E; Rautio P; Timonen KL; Matikainen T; Noponen T; Saunavaara J; Löyttyniemi E; Taimen P; Kemppainen J; Dean PB; Blanco Sequeiros R; Aronen HJ; Seppänen M; Boström PJ
Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 4(4):635-644. PubMed ID: 32675047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Total-body
Hu P; Zhang Y; Yu H; Chen S; Tan H; Qi C; Dong Y; Wang Y; Deng Z; Shi H
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2021 Jul; 48(8):2384-2394. PubMed ID: 33866409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Automatic segmentation of prostate cancer metastases in PSMA PET/CT images using deep neural networks with weighted batch-wise dice loss.
Xu Y; Klyuzhin I; Harsini S; Ortiz A; Zhang S; Bénard F; Dodhia R; Uribe CF; Rahmim A; Lavista Ferres J
Comput Biol Med; 2023 May; 158():106882. PubMed ID: 37037147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
