156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 383496)
1. 80 percent of Americans believe abortion should be legal; 70 percent approve Medicaid Funding.
Fam Plann Perspect; 1979; 11(3):189-90. PubMed ID: 383496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Public support for legal abortion continues, although polls show conflicting trends in 1983.
Fam Plann Perspect; 1983; 15(6):279-81. PubMed ID: 6667734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Hyde Amendment and the future.
Rosoff JI
Fam Plann Perspect; 1980; 12(4):172. PubMed ID: 7002585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Public funding of contraceptive, sterilization and abortion services, 1982.
Nestor B; Gold RB
Fam Plann Perspect; 1984; 16(3):128-33. PubMed ID: 6432576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. States rebel against Federal abortion orders.
Kent C; Tokarski C
J Am Health Policy; 1994; 4(2):6-7. PubMed ID: 10132602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Publicly funded abortions in FY 1980 and FY 1981.
Gold RB
Fam Plann Perspect; 1982; 14(4):204-7. PubMed ID: 6811313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Public funding for contraceptive, sterilization and abortion services, 1994.
Sollom T; Gold RB; Saul R
Fam Plann Perspect; 1996; 28(4):166-73. PubMed ID: 8853282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. After the Hyde Amendment: public funding for abortion in FY 1978.
Gold RB
Fam Plann Perspect; 1980; 12(3):131-4. PubMed ID: 6995148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The economic impact of state restrictions on abortion: parental consent and notification laws and Medicaid funding restrictions.
Haas-Wilson D
J Policy Anal Manage; 1993; 12(3):498-511. PubMed ID: 10127357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Public funding of contraceptive, sterilization and abortion services, 1983.
Gold RB; Nestor B
Fam Plann Perspect; 1985; 17(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 3884361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Controversy over abortion funding increases.
Hosp Prog; 1980 Mar; 61(3):32. PubMed ID: 10297698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Recent developments in the health care area.
Harper TD; Berg RN
J Med Assoc Ga; 1980 Sep; 69(9):785-7. PubMed ID: 7191438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Supreme Court and abortion: 2. Sidestepping social realities.
Mechanic D
Hastings Cent Rep; 1980 Dec; 10(6):17-9. PubMed ID: 7007284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Abortion debate continues: a look at laws, regulations, restrictions and funding.
Smith JA
Calif Nurse; 1980 Jun; 76(1):8. PubMed ID: 6991059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The impact of restricting Medicaid financing for abortion.
Trussell J; Menken J; Lindheim BL; Vaughan B
Fam Plann Perspect; 1980; 12(3):120-3, 127-30. PubMed ID: 6995147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Abortion in the United States, 1977-1978.
Forrest JD; Sullivan E; Tietze C
Fam Plann Perspect; 1979; 11(6):329-41. PubMed ID: 401078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Catholics agree with Protestants that abortion and contraception should be widely available.
Fam Plann Perspect; 1980; 12(1):53. PubMed ID: 11643591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The courts and elective abortions under Medicaid.
Mendelson JE; Domolky S
Soc Serv Rev; 1980 Mar; 54(1):124-34. PubMed ID: 10297796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Trends in rates of live births and abortions following state restrictions on public funding of abortion.
Korenbrot CC; Brindis C; Priddy F
Public Health Rep; 1990; 105(6):555-62. PubMed ID: 2124355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. House vote on Hyde changes dynamic of Congressional abortion debate.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1993 Jul; (12):1-2. PubMed ID: 12286695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
