BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38350077)

  • 1. Automatic recognition of second language speech-in-noise.
    Kim SE; Chernyak BR; Seleznova O; Keshet J; Goldrick M; Bradlow AR
    JASA Express Lett; 2024 Feb; 4(2):. PubMed ID: 38350077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Matrix sentence intelligibility prediction using an automatic speech recognition system.
    Schädler MR; Warzybok A; Hochmuth S; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():100-7. PubMed ID: 26383042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automatic Assessment of Intelligibility in Noise in Parkinson Disease: Validation Study.
    Moya-Galé G; Walsh SJ; Goudarzi A
    J Med Internet Res; 2022 Oct; 24(10):e40567. PubMed ID: 36264608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of noise and speech intelligibility on listener comprehension and processing time of Korean-accented English.
    Wilson EO; Spaulding TJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Dec; 53(6):1543-54. PubMed ID: 20699339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multiexpert automatic speech recognition using acoustic and myoelectric signals.
    Chan AD; Englehart KB; Hudgins B; Lovely DF
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Apr; 53(4):676-85. PubMed ID: 16602574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Listener ratings of the intelligibility of tracheoesophageal speech in noise.
    McColl D; Fucci D; Petrosino L; Martin DE; McCaffrey P
    J Commun Disord; 1998; 31(4):279-88; quiz 288-9. PubMed ID: 9697040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intelligibility of Noise-Adapted and Clear Speech in Energetic and Informational Maskers for Native and Nonnative Listeners.
    Meemann K; Smiljanić R
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Apr; 65(4):1263-1281. PubMed ID: 35235410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of noise and filtering on the intelligibility of speech produced during simultaneous communication.
    MacKenzie DJ; Schiavetti N; Whitehead RL; Metz DE
    J Commun Disord; 2004; 37(6):505-15. PubMed ID: 15450438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the sparse coding shrinkage noise reduction algorithm in normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners.
    Sang J; Hu H; Zheng C; Li G; Lutman ME; Bleeck S
    Hear Res; 2014 Apr; 310():36-47. PubMed ID: 24495441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validity of Off-the-Shelf Automatic Speech Recognition for Assessing Speech Intelligibility and Speech Severity in Speakers With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.
    Gutz SE; Stipancic KL; Yunusova Y; Berry JD; Green JR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Jun; 65(6):2128-2143. PubMed ID: 35623334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of automatic and human speech recognition in null grammar.
    Juneja A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Mar; 131(3):EL256-61. PubMed ID: 22423817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of binary mask patterns in automatic speech recognition in background noise.
    Narayanan A; Wang D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):3083-93. PubMed ID: 23654411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recognition of foreign-accented speech in noise: The interplay between talker intelligibility and linguistic structure.
    Strori D; Bradlow AR; Souza PE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Jun; 147(6):3765. PubMed ID: 32611135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recognition memory in noise for speech of varying intelligibility.
    Gilbert RC; Chandrasekaran B; Smiljanic R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):389-99. PubMed ID: 24437779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intelligibility of emotional speech in younger and older adults.
    Dupuis K; Pichora-Fuller MK
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):695-707. PubMed ID: 25127327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Second-language experience and speech-in-noise recognition: effects of talker-listener accent similarity.
    Pinet M; Iverson P; Huckvale M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1653-62. PubMed ID: 21895102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of Listener Age and Native Language Experience on Recognition of Accented and Unaccented English Words.
    Gordon-Salant S; Yeni-Komshian GH; Bieber RE; Jara Ureta DA; Freund MS; Fitzgibbons PJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4S):1131-1143. PubMed ID: 31026190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech intelligibility in noise: effects of fluency and hearing protector type.
    Abel SM; Alberti PW; Haythornthwaite C; Riko K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Mar; 71(3):708-15. PubMed ID: 7085974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spoken word recognition in adolescent cochlear implant users during quiet and multispeaker babble conditions.
    Tobey EA; Shin S; Sundarrajan M; Geers AE
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Apr; 32(3):413-8. PubMed ID: 21307815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Non-native talkers and listeners and the perceptual benefits of clear speech.
    Jung YJ; Dmitrieva O
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Jan; 153(1):137. PubMed ID: 36732255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.