These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38350077)

  • 21. Bidirectional clear speech perception benefit for native and high-proficiency non-native talkers and listeners: intelligibility and accentedness.
    Smiljanić R; Bradlow AR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Dec; 130(6):4020-31. PubMed ID: 22225056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluating OpenAI's Whisper ASR: Performance analysis across diverse accents and speaker traits.
    Graham C; Roll N
    JASA Express Lett; 2024 Feb; 4(2):. PubMed ID: 38391582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Mandarin Electrolaryngeal Speech Recognition Based on WaveNet-CTC.
    Qian Z; Wang L; Zhang S; Liu C; Niu H
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Jul; 62(7):2203-2212. PubMed ID: 31200617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Automatic Speech Recognition Predicts Speech Intelligibility and Comprehension for Listeners With Simulated Age-Related Hearing Loss.
    Fontan L; Ferrané I; Farinas J; Pinquier J; Tardieu J; Magnen C; Gaillard P; Aumont X; Füllgrabe C
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 60(9):2394-2405. PubMed ID: 28793162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of speech-intrinsic variations on human and automatic recognition of spoken phonemes.
    Meyer BT; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jan; 129(1):388-403. PubMed ID: 21303019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The benefit obtained from visually displayed text from an automatic speech recognizer during listening to speech presented in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):838-52. PubMed ID: 18633325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Relationship between listeners' nonnative speech recognition and categorization abilities.
    Atagi E; Bent T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jan; 137(1):EL44-50. PubMed ID: 25618098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Speech recognition in natural background noise.
    Meyer J; Dentel L; Meunier F
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(11):e79279. PubMed ID: 24260183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Automatic, computer-based speech assessment on edentulous patients with and without complete dentures - preliminary results.
    Stelzle F; Ugrinovic B; Knipfer C; Bocklet T; Nöth E; Schuster M; Eitner S; Seiss M; Nkenke E
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Mar; 37(3):209-16. PubMed ID: 20085615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Automatic Speech Recognition Performance Improvement for Mandarin Based on Optimizing Gain Control Strategy.
    Wang D; Wei Y; Zhang K; Ji D; Wang Y
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Apr; 22(8):. PubMed ID: 35459013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Human phoneme recognition depending on speech-intrinsic variability.
    Meyer BT; Jürgens T; Wesker T; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Nov; 128(5):3126-41. PubMed ID: 21110608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Machine learning based sample extraction for automatic speech recognition using dialectal Assamese speech.
    Agarwalla S; Sarma KK
    Neural Netw; 2016 Jun; 78():97-111. PubMed ID: 26783204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Modeling speech intelligibility in quiet and noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Rhebergen KS; Lyzenga J; Dreschler WA; Festen JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Mar; 127(3):1570-83. PubMed ID: 20329857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Accent Intelligibility Differences in Noise Across Native and Nonnative Accents: Effects of Talker-Listener Pairing at Acoustic-Phonetic and Lexical Levels.
    Stringer L; Iverson P
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Jul; 62(7):2213-2226. PubMed ID: 31251681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. ASR-based speech intelligibility prediction: A review.
    Karbasi M; Kolossa D
    Hear Res; 2022 Dec; 426():108606. PubMed ID: 36154977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The benefit of combining a deep neural network architecture with ideal ratio mask estimation in computational speech segregation to improve speech intelligibility.
    Bentsen T; May T; Kressner AA; Dau T
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0196924. PubMed ID: 29763459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Measuring the effects of reverberation and noise on sentence intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners.
    George EL; Goverts ST; Festen JM; Houtgast T
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Dec; 53(6):1429-39. PubMed ID: 20689027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of listeners' working memory and noise on speech intelligibility in dysarthria.
    Lee Y; Sung JE; Sim H
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2014 Oct; 28(10):785-95. PubMed ID: 24712561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A computer model of auditory efferent suppression: implications for the recognition of speech in noise.
    Brown GJ; Ferry RT; Meddis R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Feb; 127(2):943-54. PubMed ID: 20136217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The influence of age, hearing, and working memory on the speech comprehension benefit derived from an automatic speech recognition system.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):262-72. PubMed ID: 19194286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.