These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Flat Panel Detector c-Arms Are Associated with Dramatically Reduced Radiation Exposure During Ureteroscopy and Produce Superior Images. Lee JJ; Venna AM; McCarthy I; Cilento BG; Demers MG; MacDougall RD; Beaulieu D; Nosrati R; Nelson CP; Kurtz MP J Endourol; 2021 Jun; 35(6):789-794. PubMed ID: 33528298 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Not All Flat-Panel C-Arms Are Created Equal: A Comparison of Three Major Manufacturers. Jensen S; Peverini DR; Amasyali AS; Okhunov Z; Chen R; Hartman JC; Joo EH; Baas C; Ritchie C; Baldwin EA; Farkouh A; Baldwin DD J Endourol; 2024 Mar; 38(3):228-233. PubMed ID: 38185836 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Reduction of radiation dose for cerebral angiography using flat panel detector of direct conversion type: a vascular phantom study. Hatakeyama Y; Kakeda S; Ohnari N; Moriya J; Oda N; Nishino K; Miyamoto W; Korogi Y AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2007 Apr; 28(4):645-50. PubMed ID: 17416814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of image quality and radiation dose between an image-intensifier system and a newer-generation flat-panel detector system — technical phantom measurements and evaluation of clinical imaging in children. Weis M; Hagelstein C; Diehm T; Schoenberg SO; Neff KW Pediatr Radiol; 2016 Feb; 46(2):286-92. PubMed ID: 26481334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Difference in dose area product between analog image intensifier and digital flat panel detector in peripheral angiography and the effect of BMI. Wiesinger B; Kirchner S; Blumenstock G; Herz K; Schmehl J; Claussen CD; Wiskirchen J Rofo; 2013 Feb; 185(2):153-9. PubMed ID: 23196837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Therapeutic angiographic procedures: differences in dose area product between analog image intensifier and digital flat panel detector. Spira D; Kirchner S; Blumenstock G; Herz K; Ketelsen D; Wiskirchen J; Wiesinger B Acta Radiol; 2016 May; 57(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 26231951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radiation dose of interventional radiology system using a flat-panel detector. Chida K; Inaba Y; Saito H; Ishibashi T; Takahashi S; Kohzuki M; Zuguchi M AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Dec; 193(6):1680-5. PubMed ID: 19933664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimal beam quality for chest flat panel detector system: realistic phantom study. Kuwahara C; Aoki T; Oda N; Kawabata J; Sugimoto K; Kobayashi M; Fujii M; Korogi Y Eur Radiol; 2019 Sep; 29(9):4538-4543. PubMed ID: 30737566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Chest radiography: a comparison of image quality and effective dose using four digital systems. Pascoal A; Lawinski CP; Mackenzie A; Tabakov S; Lewis CA Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):273-7. PubMed ID: 15933121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intracranial 2D and 3D DSA with flat panel detector of the direct conversion type: initial experience. Hatakeyama Y; Kakeda S; Korogi Y; Ohnari N; Moriya J; Oda N; Nishino K; Miyamoto W Eur Radiol; 2006 Nov; 16(11):2594-602. PubMed ID: 16708219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is the image quality of conventional chest radiography obtained from a two-layer flat panel detector affected by the internal structure of the detector? Takarabe S; Kuramoto T; Shibayama Y; Yamasaki Y; Kitamura Y; Yoshikawa H; Kato T Phys Med; 2022 Mar; 95():176-181. PubMed ID: 35219067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quality control phantom for flat panel detector X-ray systems. Chida K; Kaga Y; Haga Y; Takeda K; Zuguchi M Health Phys; 2013 Jan; 104(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 23192093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dual-energy cardiac imaging: an image quality and dose comparison for a flat-panel detector and x-ray image intensifier. Ducote JL; Xu T; Molloi S Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):183-96. PubMed ID: 17183135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transition from image intensifier to flat panel detector in interventional cardiology: Impact of radiation dose. Livingstone RS; Chase D; Varghese A; George PV; George OK J Med Phys; 2015; 40(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 26150684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Radiation dose reduction in scoliosis patients: low-dose full-spine radiography with digital flat panel detector and image stitching system. Grieser T; Baldauf AQ; Ludwig K Rofo; 2011 Jul; 183(7):645-9. PubMed ID: 21614741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ultra-low-dose computed tomography system with a flat panel detector: assessment of radiation dose reduction and spatial and low contrast resolution. Nagatani Y; Nitta N; Takahashi M; Tezuka N; Nakano Y; Ikeda M; Kirino Y; Hashimoto K; Otani H; Murakami Y; Murata K Radiat Med; 2008 Dec; 26(10):627-35. PubMed ID: 19132496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development of quality control system for flat-panel detectors. Teramoto A; Kajihara T; Suzuki S; Kinoshita K; Tsuzaka M; Fujita H Radiol Phys Technol; 2011 Jul; 4(2):164-72. PubMed ID: 21409611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of flat-panel detector and image-intensifier detector for cone-beam CT. Baba R; Konno Y; Ueda K; Ikeda S Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2002; 26(3):153-8. PubMed ID: 11918976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Simulation system for understanding the lag effect in fluoroscopic images. Tanaka R; Kawashima H; Ichikawa K; Matsubara K; Iida H; Sanada S Radiol Phys Technol; 2013 Jul; 6(2):273-80. PubMed ID: 23271447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]