149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38352792)
1. A historical review and analysis on MOORA and its fuzzy extensions for different applications.
Singh R; Pathak VK; Kumar R; Dikshit M; Aherwar A; Singh V; Singh T
Heliyon; 2024 Feb; 10(3):e25453. PubMed ID: 38352792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Barriers to circular economy implementation in designing of sustainable medical waste management systems using a new extended decision-making and FMEA models.
Jafarzadeh Ghoushchi S; Memarpour Ghiaci A; Rahnamay Bonab S; Ranjbarzadeh R
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Nov; 29(53):79735-79753. PubMed ID: 35129743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Classifying environmental significance levels of production-oriented operational activities with F-ARAS and F-MOORA methods.
Polat U
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2023 May; 19(3):763-774. PubMed ID: 36239085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The applications of MCDM methods in COVID-19 pandemic: A state of the art review.
Sotoudeh-Anvari A
Appl Soft Comput; 2022 Sep; 126():109238. PubMed ID: 35795407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of consolidative multi-criteria decision making (C-MCDM) algorithms for optimal mapping of polymer materials in additive manufacturing: A case study of orthotic application.
Mian SH; Abouel Nasr E; Moiduddin K; Saleh M; Abidi MH; Alkhalefah H
Heliyon; 2024 May; 10(10):e30867. PubMed ID: 38770323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluating lecturer performance in Vietnam: An application of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods.
Do QH; Tran VT; Tran TT
Heliyon; 2024 Jun; 10(11):e30772. PubMed ID: 38933935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An integrated model for rice supplier selection strategies and a comparative analysis of fuzzy multicriteria decision-making approaches based on the fuzzy entropy weight method for evaluating rice suppliers.
Magableh GM
PLoS One; 2024; 19(4):e0301930. PubMed ID: 38635565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Group Decision Making Framework Based on Neutrosophic TOPSIS Approach for Smart Medical Device Selection.
Abdel-Basset M; Manogaran G; Gamal A; Smarandache F
J Med Syst; 2019 Jan; 43(2):38. PubMed ID: 30627801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Streamlining apartment provider evaluation: A spherical fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model.
Nguyen PH; Tran TH; Thi Nguyen LA; Pham HA; Thi Pham MA
Heliyon; 2023 Dec; 9(12):e22353. PubMed ID: 38144291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An integrated fuzzy sustainable supplier evaluation and selection framework for green supply chains in reverse logistics.
Tavana M; Shaabani A; Santos-Arteaga FJ; Valaei N
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Oct; 28(38):53953-53982. PubMed ID: 34043173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An extension of the best-worst method based on the spherical fuzzy sets for multi-criteria decision-making.
Haseli G; Sheikh R; Ghoushchi SJ; Hajiaghaei-Keshteli M; Moslem S; Deveci M; Kadry S
Granul Comput; 2024; 9(2):40. PubMed ID: 38585422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multi-criteria decision-making for coronavirus disease 2019 applications: a theoretical analysis review.
Alsalem MA; Alamoodi AH; Albahri OS; Dawood KA; Mohammed RT; Alnoor A; Zaidan AA; Albahri AS; Zaidan BB; Jumaah FM; Al-Obaidi JR
Artif Intell Rev; 2022; 55(6):4979-5062. PubMed ID: 35103030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An Integrated Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach to Assess Sustainable Urban Development in an Emerging Economy.
Dang VT; Wang J; Van-Thac Dang W
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Aug; 16(16):. PubMed ID: 31412685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparative analysis of three multi-criteria decision-making methods for land suitability assessment.
Rashidi F; Sharifian S
Environ Monit Assess; 2022 Aug; 194(9):657. PubMed ID: 35941257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An Integrated Approach of Fuzzy Linguistic Preference Based AHP and Fuzzy COPRAS for Machine Tool Evaluation.
Nguyen HT; Md Dawal SZ; Nukman Y; Aoyama H; Case K
PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0133599. PubMed ID: 26368541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Transshipment site selection using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment.
Onüt S; Soner S
Waste Manag; 2008; 28(9):1552-9. PubMed ID: 17768038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Aircraft selection by applying AHP and TOPSIS in interval type-2 fuzzy sets.
Kiracı K; Akan E
J Air Transp Manag; 2020 Oct; 89():101924. PubMed ID: 32989347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development of fuzzy multi-criteria approach to prioritize locations of treated wastewater use considering climate change scenarios.
Chung ES; Kim Y
J Environ Manage; 2014 Dec; 146():505-516. PubMed ID: 25218330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A new web-based framework development for fuzzy multi-criteria group decision-making.
Hanine M; Boutkhoum O; Tikniouine A; Agouti T
Springerplus; 2016; 5():601. PubMed ID: 27247897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fermatean fuzzy set extensions of SAW, ARAS, and VIKOR with applications in COVID-19 testing laboratory selection problem.
Gül S
Expert Syst; 2021 Dec; 38(8):e12769. PubMed ID: 34511690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
