These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38353413)

  • 41. Surgical Outcomes of Implant-based Breast Reconstruction Using TiLoop Bra Mesh Combined With Pectoralis Major Disconnection.
    Chen G; Zhang Y; Xue J; Zhu X; Liu C; Sun L; Gu X; Zhang H; Liu C
    Ann Plast Surg; 2019 Oct; 83(4):396-400. PubMed ID: 31524731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Predicted versus actual complications in Australian women undergoing post-mastectomy breast reconstruction: a retrospective cohort study using the BRA Score tool.
    Deek RP; Lee IOK; van Essen P; Crittenden T; Dean NR
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2021 Dec; 74(12):3324-3334. PubMed ID: 34253489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Ostapenko E; Nixdorf L; Devyatko Y; Exner R; Wimmer K; Fitzal F
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2023 Jan; 30(1):126-136. PubMed ID: 36245049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Patient-Reported Outcomes in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Alone or in Combination with a Titanium-Coated Polypropylene Mesh - A Detailed Analysis of the BREAST-Q and Overview of the Literature.
    Dieterich M; Angres J; Stubert J; Stachs A; Reimer T; Gerber B
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 2015 Jul; 75(7):692-701. PubMed ID: 26257406
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Patient Quality of Life After Subpectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction With Synthetic or Biological Materials.
    Ohlinger R; Alwafai Z; Paepke S; Zygmunt M; Nawroth F; Schüler K; Fröhlich P
    Anticancer Res; 2021 Jun; 41(6):3075-3082. PubMed ID: 34083300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Short-term cost-effectiveness of one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix versus two-stage expander-implant reconstruction from a multicentre randomized clinical trial.
    Negenborn VL; Smit JM; Dikmans REG; Winters HAH; Twisk JWR; Ruhé PQ; Mureau MAM; Tuinder S; Eltahir Y; Posch NAS; van Steveninck-Barends JM; van der Hulst RRWJ; Ritt MJPF; Bouman MB; Mullender MG
    Br J Surg; 2019 Apr; 106(5):586-595. PubMed ID: 30835827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Postoperative Complications Following Prepectoral Versus Partial Subpectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using ADM: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Zhu L; Liu C
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2023 Aug; 47(4):1260-1273. PubMed ID: 36947180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Revision Incidence after Immediate Direct-to-Implant versus Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using National Real-World Data.
    Becherer BE; Heeg E; Young-Afat DA; Vrancken Peeters MTFD; Rakhorst HA; Mureau MAM;
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2023 Apr; 151(4):693-702. PubMed ID: 36729987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Quality of life and patient satisfaction after one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix versus two-stage breast reconstruction (BRIOS): primary outcome of a randomised, controlled trial.
    Negenborn VL; Young-Afat DA; Dikmans REG; Smit JM; Winters HAH; Don Griot JPW; Twisk JWR; Ruhé PQ; Mureau MAM; Lapid O; Moerman E; van Turnhout AAWM; Ritt MJPF; Bouman MB; Mullender MG
    Lancet Oncol; 2018 Sep; 19(9):1205-1214. PubMed ID: 30104147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Post-mastectomy adjuvant radiotherapy for direct-to-implant and two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction: A meta-analysis.
    Du F; Liu R; Zhang H; Xiao Y; Long X
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2022 Sep; 75(9):3030-3040. PubMed ID: 35961927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Patient-reported outcomes of immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with and without biological or synthetic mesh.
    Sewart E; Turner NL; Conroy EJ; Cutress RI; Skillman J; Whisker L; Thrush S; Barnes N; Holcombe C; Potter S;
    BJS Open; 2021 Jan; 5(1):. PubMed ID: 33609398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The Impact of Premastectomy Versus Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy on Outcomes in Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.
    Sinnott CJ; Pronovost MT; Persing SM; Wu R; Young AO
    Ann Plast Surg; 2021 Jul; 87(1s Suppl 1):S21-S27. PubMed ID: 33833185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on surgical outcomes following autologous and implant-based immediate breast reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Sabitovic A; Trøstrup H; Damsgaard TE
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2023 Dec; 87():17-23. PubMed ID: 37804643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Direct-to-implant breast reconstruction: Higher complication rate vs cosmetic benefits.
    Gschwantler-Kaulich D; Leser C; Salama M; Singer CF
    Breast J; 2018 Nov; 24(6):957-964. PubMed ID: 30230119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Review: Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy for Breast Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Prospective Studies Comparing Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix (ADM) Versus Without ADM.
    Ng TP; Loo BYK; Yong N; Chia CLK; Lohsiriwat V
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2024 May; 31(5):3366-3376. PubMed ID: 38285304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Breast Reconstruction Outcomes with and without Strattice: Long-Term Outcomes of a Multicenter Study Comparing Strattice Immediate Implant Breast Reconstruction with Submuscular Implant Reconstruction.
    Wilson RL; Kirwan CC; Johnson RK; O'Donoghue JM; Linforth RA; Harvey JR
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2023 Jul; 152(1):11-19. PubMed ID: 36728408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Single stage immediate breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix and implant: Defining the risks and outcomes of post-mastectomy radiotherapy.
    Apte A; Walsh M; Balaji P; Khor B; Chandrasekharan S; Chakravorty A
    Surgeon; 2020 Aug; 18(4):202-207. PubMed ID: 31636037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Immediate breast reconstruction with latissimus dorsi flap and implant: audit of outcomes and patient satisfaction survey.
    Venus MR; Prinsloo DJ
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2010 Jan; 63(1):101-5. PubMed ID: 19028153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Short-term safety outcomes of mastectomy and immediate prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction: Pre-BRA prospective multicentre cohort study.
    Harvey KL; Sinai P; Mills N; White P; Holcombe C; Potter S;
    Br J Surg; 2022 May; 109(6):530-538. PubMed ID: 35576373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Variation in the provision and practice of implant-based breast reconstruction in the UK: Results from the iBRA national practice questionnaire.
    Mylvaganam S; Conroy E; Williamson PR; Barnes NLP; Cutress RI; Gardiner MD; Jain A; Skillman JM; Thrush S; Whisker LJ; Blazeby JM; Potter S; Holcombe C; ;
    Breast; 2017 Oct; 35():182-190. PubMed ID: 28768227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.