155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38353825)
21. Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Xia L; Zhang X; Wang X; Xu T; Qin L; Zhang X; Zhong S; Shen Z
Int J Surg; 2016 Jun; 30():109-15. PubMed ID: 27107660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Robotic partial nephrectomy with superselective versus main artery clamping: a retrospective comparison.
Desai MM; de Castro Abreu AL; Leslie S; Cai J; Huang EY; Lewandowski PM; Lee D; Dharmaraja A; Berger AK; Goh A; Ukimura O; Aron M; Gill IS
Eur Urol; 2014 Oct; 66(4):713-9. PubMed ID: 24486306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The future of "Retro" robotic partial nephrectomy.
Strauss DM; Lee R; Maffucci F; Abbott D; Masic S; Kutikov A
Transl Androl Urol; 2021 May; 10(5):2199-2208. PubMed ID: 34159103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Trans-peritoneal vs. retroperitoneal robotic assisted partial nephrectomy in posterior renal tumours: need for a risk-stratified patient individualised approach. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
McLean A; Mukherjee A; Phukan C; Veeratterapillay R; Soomro N; Somani B; Rai BP
J Robot Surg; 2020 Feb; 14(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 31089965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Safety and efficacy of transperitoneal laparoscopic nephron sparing surgery in patients with previous abdominal surgery.
Manno S; Dell'Atti L; Cicione A; Spasari A
Urologia; 2021 Feb; 88(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 32484072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of retroperitoneal and transperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy for Pentafecta perioperative and renal functional outcomes.
Stroup SP; Hamilton ZA; Marshall MT; Lee HJ; Berquist SW; Hassan AS; Beksac AT; Field CA; Bloch A; Wan F; McDonald ML; Patel ND; L'Esperance JO; Derweesh IH
World J Urol; 2017 Nov; 35(11):1721-1728. PubMed ID: 28656359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Retroperitoneal versus transepritoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for postero-lateral renal masses: an international multicenter analysis.
Carbonara U; Eun D; Derweesh I; Capitanio U; Celia A; Fiori C; Checcucci E; Amparore D; Lee J; Larcher A; Patel D; Meagher M; Crocerossa F; Veccia A; Hampton LJ; Montorsi F; Porpiglia F; Autorino R
World J Urol; 2021 Nov; 39(11):4175-4182. PubMed ID: 34050813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Novel technique: direct access partial nephrectomy approach through a transperitoneal working space (Roskilde technique).
Azawi NH; Lindgren MS; Ibsen IU; Tolouee S; Nadler N; Dahl C; Fode M
Scand J Urol; 2019 Aug; 53(4):261-264. PubMed ID: 31174447
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Five-year Oncologic Outcomes After Transperitoneal Robotic Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Andrade HS; Zargar H; Caputo PA; Akca O; Kara O; Ramirez D; Haber GP; Stein RJ; Kaouk JH
Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1149-54. PubMed ID: 26719014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Robotic-assisted transperitoneal nephron-sparing surgery for small renal masses with associated surgical procedures: surgical technique and preliminary experience.
Ceccarelli G; Codacci-Pisanelli M; Patriti A; Ceribelli C; Biancafarina A; Casciola L
Updates Surg; 2013 Sep; 65(3):183-90. PubMed ID: 23619828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Transperitoneal vs retroperitoneal minimally invasive partial nephrectomy: comparison of perioperative outcomes and functional follow-up in a large multi-institutional cohort (The RECORD 2 Project).
Porpiglia F; Mari A; Amparore D; Fiori C; Antonelli A; Artibani W; Bove P; Brunocilla E; Capitanio U; Da Pozzo L; Di Maida F; Gontero P; Longo N; Marra G; Rocco B; Schiavina R; Simeone C; Siracusano S; Tellini R; Terrone C; Villari D; Ficarra V; Carini M; Minervini A;
Surg Endosc; 2021 Aug; 35(8):4295-4304. PubMed ID: 32856156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Assessing the Trade-off Between the Safety and Effectiveness of Off-clamp Robotic Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Masses with a High RENAL Score: A Propensity Score-matched Comparison of Perioperative and Functional Outcomes in a Multicenter Analysis.
Tuderti G; Mastroianni R; Anceschi U; Bove AM; Brassetti A; Ferriero M; Misuraca L; Guaglianone S; Costantini M; Torregiani G; Saidian A; Mari A; Narasimhan R; Derweesh I; Minervini A; Gallucci M; Simone G
Eur Urol Focus; 2023 Nov; 9(6):1037-1043. PubMed ID: 37263828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair, bicenter analysis with cost comparison using time-driven activity-based costing.
Laviana AA; Tan HJ; Hu JC; Weizer AZ; Chang SS; Barocas DA
Curr Opin Urol; 2018 Mar; 28(2):108-114. PubMed ID: 29278580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Predictive Factors for Achieving Superior Pentafecta Outcomes Following Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy in Patients with Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Kang M; Gong IH; Park HJ; Sung HH; Jeon HG; Jeong BC; Jeon SS; Lee HM; Choi HY; Il Seo S
J Endourol; 2017 Dec; 31(12):1231-1236. PubMed ID: 29048228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Transperitoneal vs. retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy: a matched-paired analysis.
Mittakanti HR; Heulitt G; Li HF; Porter JR
World J Urol; 2020 May; 38(5):1093-1099. PubMed ID: 31420695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Postoperative outcomes of transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy: a propensity-score matched comparison focused on patient mobilization, return to bowel function, and pain.
Bertolo R; Ditonno F; Veccia A; De Marco V; Migliorini F; Porcaro AB; Rizzetto R; Cerruto MA; Autorino R; Antonelli A;
J Robot Surg; 2024 Feb; 18(1):96. PubMed ID: 38413473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. No ischemia technique, parenchymal preservation and age are the most important determinants of renal function after partial nephrectomy.
Mutelica L; Mouracadé P; Kara O; Dagenais J; Maurice MJ; Kaouk JH
Prog Urol; 2020 Jan; 30(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 31848073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of perioperative and functional outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy for cT1a vs cT1b renal masses.
Reynolds CR; Delto JC; Paulucci DJ; Weinstein C; Badani K; Eun D; Abaza R; Porter J; Bhandari A; Hemal AK
BJU Int; 2017 Dec; 120(6):842-847. PubMed ID: 28710786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. PADUA and R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scores correlate with perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: analysis of the Vattikuti Global Quality Initiative in Robotic Urologic Surgery (GQI-RUS) database.
Schiavina R; Novara G; Borghesi M; Ficarra V; Ahlawat R; Moon DA; Porpiglia F; Challacombe BJ; Dasgupta P; Brunocilla E; La Manna G; Volpe A; Verma H; Martorana G; Mottrie A
BJU Int; 2017 Mar; 119(3):456-463. PubMed ID: 27528265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Retroperitoneal Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy for Posterior Renal Masses Is Associated with Earlier Hospital Discharge: A Single-Institution Retrospective Comparison.
Kim EH; Larson JA; Potretzke AM; Hulsey NK; Bhayani SB; Figenshau RS
J Endourol; 2015 Oct; 29(10):1137-42. PubMed ID: 25816694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
