These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3835424)
41. Antitrust implications of health planning: National Gerimedical Hospital and Gerontology Center v. Blue Cross of Kansas City. Chase JB Am J Law Med; 1982; 8(3):321-48. PubMed ID: 7168454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Antitrust implications of chiropractic Peer Review Committees. Volper V Am J Law Med; 1982; 8(1):45-68. PubMed ID: 7124747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Antitrust and professional activities. Hirsh BD JAMA; 1983 Jul 22-29; 250(4):491-2. PubMed ID: 6864945 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Provider-sponsored ADSs: reducing antitrust liability after Maricopa. Walsh JH; Feller H Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1985 Apr; 7(2):5-25. PubMed ID: 10270877 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Medical care at predetermined prices does not violate antitrust laws. Rothschild IS Health Law Vigil; 1987 Apr; 10(9):5-6, 12. PubMed ID: 10281338 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Examining exclusionary conduct of HMOs and PPOs: a case comment on Northwest Medical Laboratories v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Oregon. Levitt DM Am J Law Med; 1991; 17(3):271-88. PubMed ID: 1785621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Hospital medical staff privileges and antitrust: an overview. Weissburg C; Waxman JM Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1981; 14(6):48-51. PubMed ID: 10253024 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Federal judge says Blue Shield of Virginia justified in limiting reimbursement to psychologists. Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1979 Jul; 30(7):493, 497. PubMed ID: 447237 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Most-favored-nation clauses and monopsonistic power: an unhealthy mix? Stenger SE Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(1):111-28. PubMed ID: 2764011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Court: Indiana Blues may adopt PPO plan without antitrust scrutiny. Allen HS; Rothschild IS Health Law Vigil; 1986 Apr; 9(8):4-5. PubMed ID: 10278389 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. U.S. District Court finds Blue Shield physician payment method violates Sec. 1 of the Sherman Act. Laurence K; Kinney ED Health Law Vigil; 1984 Mar; 7(7):4-7. PubMed ID: 10278231 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Competition in health insurance markets. Pauly MV Law Contemp Probl; 1988; 51(2):237-71. PubMed ID: 10295964 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Evaluating antitrust risk in joint provider negotiations with payors. Leonard EJ Med Staff Couns; 1992; 6(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 10115450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. "Blues interfered illegally with HMO.". Burda D Mod Healthc; 1987 Nov; 17(24):12. PubMed ID: 10284683 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Antitrust implications of "all-inclusive" payment methodologies: the Empire Blue Cross decision. Miles JJ Health Law Vigil; 1987 Jun; 10(13):5-7. PubMed ID: 10282184 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Appeals Court limits antitrust review of physician-hospital disputes. Christensen JD Health Law Vigil; 1988 Sep; 11(19):3-4. PubMed ID: 10288887 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Antitrust in the health services industry: the first five years. Dolan AK Health Med Care Serv Rev; 1981-1982; 3(2-3):13, 15-24. PubMed ID: 10299261 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]