These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38354552)

  • 1. Updating design guidelines for cognitive ergonomics in human-centred collaborative robotics applications: An expert survey.
    Gualtieri L; Fraboni F; Brendel H; Pietrantoni L; Vidoni R; Dallasega P
    Appl Ergon; 2024 May; 117():104246. PubMed ID: 38354552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development and evaluation of design guidelines for cognitive ergonomics in human-robot collaborative assembly systems.
    Gualtieri L; Fraboni F; De Marchi M; Rauch E
    Appl Ergon; 2022 Oct; 104():103807. PubMed ID: 35763990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Teleoperator-Robot-Human Interaction in Manufacturing: Perspectives from Industry, Robot Manufacturers, and Researchers.
    Kim S; Hernandez I; Nussbaum MA; Lim S
    IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors; 2024; 12(1-2):28-40. PubMed ID: 38328969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Imposing Motion Variability for Ergonomic Human-Robot Collaboration.
    Zolotas M; Luo R; Bazzi S; Saha D; Mabulu K; Kloeckl K; Padır T
    IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors; 2024; 12(1-2):123-134. PubMed ID: 38498062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scientific basis of the OCRA method for risk assessment of biomechanical overload of upper limb, as preferred method in ISO standards on biomechanical risk factors.
    Colombini D; Occhipinti E
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jul; 44(4):436-438. PubMed ID: 29961081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Promises of industry 4.0 under the magnifying glass of interdisciplinarity: revealing operators and managers work and challenging collaborative robot design.
    Barcellini F; Béarée R; Benchekroun TH; Bounouar M; Buchmann W; Dubey G; Lafeuillade AC; Moricot C; Rosselin-Bareille C; Saraceno M; Siadat A
    Cogn Technol Work; 2023 Apr; ():1-21. PubMed ID: 37359479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ergonomic intervention on a packing workstation with robotic aid -case study at a furniture manufacturing industry.
    Colim A; Sousa N; Carneiro P; Costa N; Arezes P; Cardoso A
    Work; 2020; 66(1):229-237. PubMed ID: 32417807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. OSH related risks and opportunities for industrial human-robot interaction: results from literature and practice.
    Heinold E; Funk M; Niehaus S; Rosen PH; Wischniewski S
    Front Robot AI; 2023; 10():1277360. PubMed ID: 37965632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Awareness and perceptions of ergonomic programs between workers and managers surveyed in the construction industry.
    Sneller TN; Choi SD; Ahn K
    Work; 2018; 61(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 30223411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Design of a workstation based on a human-interfacing robot for occupational health and safety.
    Yu K; Zhang L; Zhang Y; Yu Q; Li X; Krishnamoorthy S
    Work; 2021; 68(3):863-870. PubMed ID: 33612529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Review and Qualitative Meta-Analysis of Digital Human Modeling and Cyber-Physical-Systems in Ergonomics 4.0.
    Paul G; Abele ND; Kluth K
    IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors; 2021; 9(3-4):111-123. PubMed ID: 34380380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evolution of the biomechanical dimension of the professional gestures of grinders when using a collaborative robot.
    Schoose C; Cuny-Guerrier A; Caroly S; Claudon L; Wild P; Savescu A
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2023 Jun; 29(2):668-675. PubMed ID: 35416130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Human-robot interaction: how worker influence in task allocation improves autonomy.
    Tausch A; Peifer C; Kirchhoff BM; Kluge A
    Ergonomics; 2022 Sep; 65(9):1230-1244. PubMed ID: 35099354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cognitive Ergonomics of Assembly Work from a Job Demands-Resources Perspective: Three Qualitative Case Studies.
    Wollter Bergman M; Berlin C; Babapour Chafi M; Falck AC; Örtengren R
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Nov; 18(23):. PubMed ID: 34886007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Human-Robot Collaborations in Smart Manufacturing Environments: Review and Outlook.
    Othman U; Yang E
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Jun; 23(12):. PubMed ID: 37420834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Human Factors Considerations for Quantifiable Human States in Physical Human-Robot Interaction: A Literature Review.
    Abdulazeem N; Hu Y
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Aug; 23(17):. PubMed ID: 37687837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Digital Twin-Driven Human Robot Collaboration Using a Digital Human.
    Maruyama T; Ueshiba T; Tada M; Toda H; Endo Y; Domae Y; Nakabo Y; Mori T; Suita K
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Dec; 21(24):. PubMed ID: 34960355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Emotion-Driven Analysis and Control of Human-Robot Interactions in Collaborative Applications.
    Toichoa Eyam A; Mohammed WM; Martinez Lastra JL
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jul; 21(14):. PubMed ID: 34300366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.