157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38355459)
1. The learning curve of the MS-TRAM/DIEP breast reconstruction by dual-trained breast surgeons.
Li S; Zhang S; Zhang X; Yan J; Wang S; Tan L; Rao N; Chen K; Zhu L
BMC Surg; 2024 Feb; 24(1):53. PubMed ID: 38355459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [The DIEP Flap as Method of Choice in Breast Reconstruction - Results and Protocol for Succesful Reconstruction].
Otte M; Andree C; Hagouan M; Richrath P; Abu-Ghazaleh A; Munder B
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 2015 Aug; 47(4):222-7. PubMed ID: 26287324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Myosonographic study of abdominal wall dynamics to assess donor site morbidity after microsurgical breast reconstruction with a DIEP or an ms-2 TRAM flap.
Seidenstuecker K; Legler U; Munder B; Andree C; Mahajan A; Witzel C
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2016 May; 69(5):598-603. PubMed ID: 27049776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Is there a psychological and physiological difference between DIEP- and free TRAM-flap? A retrospective patient survey].
Wurzer P; Spendel S; Kamolz LP; Parvizi D; Tuca A; Rappl T
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 2014 Aug; 46(4):256-62. PubMed ID: 25162244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A cost-effectiveness analysis of DIEP vs free MS-TRAM flap for microsurgical breast reconstruction.
Tan MG; Isaranuwatchai W; DeLyzer T; Butler K; Hofer SOP; O'Neill AC; Zhong T
J Surg Oncol; 2019 Mar; 119(3):388-396. PubMed ID: 30562406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of morbidity, functional outcome, and satisfaction following bilateral TRAM versus bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction.
Chun YS; Sinha I; Turko A; Yueh JH; Lipsitz S; Pribaz JJ; Lee BT
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Oct; 126(4):1133-1141. PubMed ID: 20555301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. DIEP and pedicled TRAM flaps: a comparison of outcomes.
Garvey PB; Buchel EW; Pockaj BA; Casey WJ; Gray RJ; Hernández JL; Samson TD
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 May; 117(6):1711-9; discussion 1720-1. PubMed ID: 16651940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Main factors determining the use of free MS-TRAM and DIEP flaps and comparing the results of breast reconstruction.
Smolanka II; Galych SP; Movchan OV; Bagmut IY; Sheremet MI; Kolisnyk IL; Bagmut OV; Lyashenko AO; Dosenko IV; Ivankova OM; Maksymyuk VV; Tarabanchuk VV
J Med Life; 2023 Jan; 16(1):121-128. PubMed ID: 36873129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Meta-analysis of the safety and factors contributing to complications of MS-TRAM, DIEP, and SIEA flaps for breast reconstruction.
Wang XL; Liu LB; Song FM; Wang QY
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2014 Aug; 38(4):681-91. PubMed ID: 24902911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast reconstruction with the DIEP flap or the muscle-sparing (MS-2) free TRAM flap: is there a difference?
Nahabedian MY; Tsangaris T; Momen B
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Feb; 115(2):436-44; discussion 445-6. PubMed ID: 15692347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Double pedicle deep inferior epigastric perforator/muscle-sparing TRAM flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction.
Agarwal JP; Gottlieb LJ
Ann Plast Surg; 2007 Apr; 58(4):359-63. PubMed ID: 17413875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) catheters inserted under direct vision in the donor site following free DIEP and MS-TRAM breast reconstruction: a prospective cohort study of 45 patients.
Zhong T; Wong KW; Cheng H; Ojha M; Srinivas C; McCluskey SA; Clarke H; Jacks L; Hofer SO
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Mar; 66(3):329-36. PubMed ID: 23142025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Meta-analysis of flap perfusion and donor site complications for breast reconstruction using pedicled versus free TRAM and DIEP flaps.
Jeong W; Lee S; Kim J
Breast; 2018 Apr; 38():45-51. PubMed ID: 29227815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of donor-site complications and functional outcomes in free muscle-sparing TRAM flap and free DIEP flap breast reconstruction.
Bajaj AK; Chevray PM; Chang DW
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 Mar; 117(3):737-46; discussion 747-50. PubMed ID: 16525258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Immediate postoperative complications in DIEP versus free/muscle-sparing TRAM flaps.
Chen CM; Halvorson EG; Disa JJ; McCarthy C; Hu QY; Pusic AL; Cordeiro PG; Mehrara BJ
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2007 Nov; 120(6):1477-1482. PubMed ID: 18040176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Oncoplastic and reconstructive breast surgeon performance and impact on breast reconstructions: Clinical outcomes, learning curve, and patients' satisfaction.
Lai HW; Lin J; Sae-Lim C; Lin YJ; Chen DR; Lai YC; Lin SL; Chen ST
Surg Oncol; 2023 Apr; 47():101920. PubMed ID: 36871539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inclusion of mesh in donor-site repair of free TRAM and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps yields rates of abdominal complications comparable to those of DIEP flap reconstruction.
Wan DC; Tseng CY; Anderson-Dam J; Dalio AL; Crisera CA; Festekjian JH
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Aug; 126(2):367-374. PubMed ID: 20679822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Muscle-sparing TRAM flap does not protect breast reconstruction from postmastectomy radiation damage compared with the DIEP flap.
Garvey PB; Clemens MW; Hoy AE; Smith B; Zhang H; Kronowitz SJ; Butler CE
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Feb; 133(2):223-233. PubMed ID: 24469158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparing the donor-site morbidity using DIEP, SIEA or MS-TRAM flaps for breast reconstructive surgery: a meta-analysis.
Egeberg A; Rasmussen MK; Sørensen JA
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2012 Nov; 65(11):1474-80. PubMed ID: 22841854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A systematic review of abdominal wall function following abdominal flaps for postmastectomy breast reconstruction.
Atisha D; Alderman AK
Ann Plast Surg; 2009 Aug; 63(2):222-30. PubMed ID: 19593108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
