169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38356107)
1. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Sintilimab Plus Chemotherapy in Advanced Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Societal Perspective.
Li F; Chen Y; Xiao D; Jiang S; Yang Y
Adv Ther; 2024 Apr; 41(4):1436-1449. PubMed ID: 38356107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness of sintilimab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Liu L; Wang L; Chen L; Ding Y; Zhang Q; Shu Y
Front Immunol; 2023; 14():1092385. PubMed ID: 36756110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Economic evaluation of sintilimab plus chemotherapy vs. pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for the treatment of first-line advanced or metastatic squamous NSCLC.
Chen P; Wang X; Zhu S; Li H; Rui M; Wang Y; Sun H; Ma A
Front Public Health; 2022; 10():956792. PubMed ID: 36016894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effectiveness analysis of sintilimab plus pemetrexed and platinum versus chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment in metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in China.
Liu H; Wang Y; He Q
Health Econ Rev; 2022 Dec; 12(1):66. PubMed ID: 36581793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing the cost-effectiveness of sintilimab + pemetrexed plus platinum and pemetrexed plus platinum alone as a first-line therapy for Chinese patients with nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer.
Shi Y; Qian D; Li Y; Chen W; Bo M; Zhang M; Shi J; Jia B; Dai Y; Li G
Transl Cancer Res; 2023 Apr; 12(4):928-938. PubMed ID: 37180653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. First-line sintilimab plus chemotherapy in locally advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A cost-effectiveness analysis from China.
Shen J; Du Y; Shao R; Jiang R
Front Pharmacol; 2022; 13():967182. PubMed ID: 36569294
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness analysis of sintilimab vs. placebo in combination with chemotherapy as first-line therapy for local advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Shao T; Zhao M; Tang W
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():953671. PubMed ID: 36561521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Immune checkpoint inhibitors as the second-line treatment for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a cost-effectiveness analysis based on network meta-analysis.
Yang X; Zheng X; Hu S; Huang J; Zhang M; Huang P; Wang J
BMC Cancer; 2024 May; 24(1):654. PubMed ID: 38811891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-utility of sintilimab plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy as first-line treatment of advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer in China.
Li W; Wan L
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2024 Jun; 24(5):671-678. PubMed ID: 38594905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Immune checkpoint inhibitors
Liu S; Dou L; Li S
Therap Adv Gastroenterol; 2024; 17():17562848241233134. PubMed ID: 38425370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-effectiveness analysis of sintilimab + chemotherapy versus camrelizumab + chemotherapy for the treatment of first-line locally advanced or metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC in China.
Rui M; Fei Z; Wang Y; Zhang X; Ma A; Sun H; Li H
J Med Econ; 2022; 25(1):618-629. PubMed ID: 35475459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness analysis of sintilimab plus bevacizumab biosimilar compared with lenvatinib as the first-line treatment of unresectable or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma.
Zhou T; Wang X; Cao Y; Yang L; Wang Z; Ma A; Li H
BMC Health Serv Res; 2022 Nov; 22(1):1367. PubMed ID: 36397064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-effectiveness analysis of tislelizumab vs. camrelizumab for the treatment of second-line locally advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Chen P; Fu C; Shen L; Fei Z; Luo M; Chen Y; Li H
BMC Health Serv Res; 2024 May; 24(1):676. PubMed ID: 38807104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Economic evaluation of sintilimab versus docetaxel as second-line treatment for patients with advanced or metastatic squamous non-small-cell lung cancer in China: a model-based cost-effectiveness analysis.
Liao M; Kang S
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2024 Jan; 24(1):161-166. PubMed ID: 37789675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Toripalimab plus chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A cost-effectiveness analysis.
Huo G; Liu W; Kang S; Chen P
Front Pharmacol; 2023; 14():1131219. PubMed ID: 36865925
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-effectiveness of first-line versus second-line use of domestic anti-PD-1 antibody sintilimab in Chinese patients with advanced or metastatic squamous non-small cell lung cancer.
Cheng R; Zhou Z; Liu Q
Cancer Med; 2023 Mar; 12(6):7389-7397. PubMed ID: 36373001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-effectiveness analysis of sintilimab plus chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
You M; Huang Y; Cai Z; Wu Q; Zhu W; He Y; Chen R
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():986762. PubMed ID: 36568254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Economic Evaluation of Sintilimab Plus Bevacizumab Versus Sorafenib as a First-line Treatment for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Zhou T; Cao Y; Wang X; Yang L; Wang Z; Ma A; Li H
Adv Ther; 2022 May; 39(5):2165-2177. PubMed ID: 35296994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-effectiveness of camrelizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as first-line therapy in advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Gong J; Shang J; Su D; Qian X; Liu G; Sun Z
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2023; 23(6):709-717. PubMed ID: 37190977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Sintilimab Combined with Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone as the First-Line Treatment for Advanced Esophageal Cancer.
Ye ZM; Xu Z; Zeng FY; Tang ZQ; Zhou Q
Front Pharmacol; 2022; 13():934275. PubMed ID: 36518659
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
