These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38356189)

  • 21. Masked Morphological Priming and Sensitivity to the Statistical Structure of Form-to-Meaning Mapping in L2.
    Viviani E; Crepaldi D
    J Cogn; 2022; 5(1):30. PubMed ID: 36072123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Discrimination in lexical decision.
    Milin P; Feldman LB; Ramscar M; Hendrix P; Baayen RH
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0171935. PubMed ID: 28235015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Reexamining the word length effect in visual word recognition: new evidence from the English Lexicon Project.
    New B; Ferrand L; Pallier C; Brysbaert M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Feb; 13(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 16724767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Masked priming of prefixes and the influence of spelling-meaning consistency.
    Chateau D; Knudsen EV; Jared D
    Brain Lang; 2002; 81(1-3):587-600. PubMed ID: 12081424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Learning to Spell Novel Words: The Relationship Between Orthographic and Semantic Representations During Incidental Learning.
    de Long SPA; Folk JR
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2022 Oct; 51(5):1101-1120. PubMed ID: 35538271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of morphological family on word recognition in normal aging, mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer's disease.
    Nikolaev A; Ashaie S; Hallikainen M; Hänninen T; Higby E; Hyun J; Lehtonen M; Soininen H
    Cortex; 2019 Jul; 116():91-103. PubMed ID: 30612700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Relation between pronunciation and recognition of printed words in deep and shallow orthographies.
    Katz L; Feldman LB
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1983 Jan; 9(1):157-66. PubMed ID: 6220113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The orthographic similarity structure of English words: Insights from network science.
    Siew CSQ
    Appl Netw Sci; 2018; 3(1):13. PubMed ID: 30839818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Orthographic and root frequency effects in Arabic: Evidence from eye movements and lexical decision.
    Hermena EW; Liversedge SP; Bouamama S; Drieghe D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 May; 45(5):934-954. PubMed ID: 30247050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Influence of Orthographic Neighborhood Density and Word Frequency on Visual Word Recognition: Insights from RT Distributional Analyses.
    Lim SW
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():401. PubMed ID: 27065902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Feature distinctiveness effects in language acquisition and lexical processing: Insights from megastudies.
    Siew CSQ
    Cogn Process; 2020 Nov; 21(4):669-685. PubMed ID: 31974763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The role of semantic transparency in visual word recognition of compound words: A megastudy approach.
    Kim SY; Yap MJ; Goh WD
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Dec; 51(6):2722-2732. PubMed ID: 30291593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Quantifying the regularities between orthography and semantics and their impact on group- and individual-level behavior.
    Siegelman N; Rueckl JG; Lo JCM; Kearns DM; Morris RD; Compton DL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Jun; 48(6):839-855. PubMed ID: 35084923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Top-down modulation of brain responses in spelling error recognition.
    Larionova E; Garakh Z; Martynova O
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2023 May; 235():103891. PubMed ID: 36933384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of semantic transparency on the processing of morphologically derived words: Evidence from decision latencies and event-related potentials.
    Jared D; Jouravlev O; Joanisse MF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Mar; 43(3):422-450. PubMed ID: 27685020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The role of lexical variables in the visual recognition of Chinese characters: A megastudy analysis.
    Sze WP; Yap MJ; Rickard Liow SJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(8):1541-70. PubMed ID: 25622522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Inter-character Orthographic Similarity Effects on the Recognition of Chinese Coordinative Compound Words.
    Sun J; Zhao W; Pae HK
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2020 Feb; 49(1):125-145. PubMed ID: 31583601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. What's in a word? A parametric study of semantic influences on visual word recognition.
    Evans GA; Lambon Ralph MA; Woollams AM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Apr; 19(2):325-31. PubMed ID: 22258820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Semantic size does not matter: "bigger" words are not recognized faster.
    Kang SH; Yap MJ; Tse CS; Kurby CA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jun; 64(6):1041-7. PubMed ID: 21644189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Semantic Richness and Aging: The Effect of Number of Features in the Lexical Decision Task.
    Robert C; Rico Duarte L
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2016 Apr; 45(2):359-65. PubMed ID: 25680348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.