121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3835958)
1. Finger tip dermatitis.
Sinclair PA; Nurse DS
Australas J Dermatol; 1985 Dec; 26(3):137-8. PubMed ID: 3835958
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Sensitivity to dichromate in milk testers.
Rudski E; Czerwinska-Dihnz I
Contact Dermatitis; 1977 Apr; 3(2):107. PubMed ID: 872574
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Contact dermatitis to chrome in milk testers.
Rogers S; Burrows D
Contact Dermatitis; 1975 Dec; 1(6):387-8. PubMed ID: 139267
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Tolerance of leather in chromium hypersensitivity].
Rudzki E; Kozłowska A
Przegl Dermatol; 1979; 66(3):237-41. PubMed ID: 472341
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Diagnostic usefulness of epidermal tests with potassium dichromate in different solutions].
Kieć-Swierczyńska M; Krysiak B
Przegl Dermatol; 1988; 75(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 3238012
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Immunologic shifts in tanners under the influence of potassium bichromate contact].
Medvid' IV; Gol'dshteĭn LM
Vestn Dermatol Venerol; 1989; (5):39-43. PubMed ID: 2528247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Chromium dermatitis and ascorbic acid.
Valsecchi R; Cainelli T
Contact Dermatitis; 1984 Apr; 10(4):252-3. PubMed ID: 6234142
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Contact sensitivity to trivalent chromium compounds.
Rudzki E; Zakrzewski Z; Prokopczyk G; Kozlowska A
Derm Beruf Umwelt; 1978; 26(3):83-5. PubMed ID: 754923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reactions of epidermal keratinocytes in sensitized and non-sensitized guinea pigs after dichromate exposure: an electron microscopic study.
Lindberg M; Forslind B; Wahlberg JE
Acta Derm Venereol; 1982; 62(5):389-96. PubMed ID: 6183887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prevalence of dichromate sensitivity.
Peltonen L; Fräki J
Contact Dermatitis; 1983 May; 9(3):190-4. PubMed ID: 6222873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Sensitization of workers in the leather-processing industry to occupational irritants].
Medvid' IV; Gol'dshteĭn LM
Vestn Dermatol Venerol; 1988; (4):65-7. PubMed ID: 2970721
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Follow-up study of patients with contact dermatitis caused by chromates, nickel, and cobalt.
Dooms-Goossens A; Ceuterick A; Vanmaele N; Degreef H
Dermatologica; 1980; 160(4):249-60. PubMed ID: 7358190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Trial of 0.5% versus 0.375% potassium dichromate. European Environmental and Contact Dermatitis Research Group (EECDRG).
Burrows D; Andersen KE; Camarasa JG; Dooms-Goossens A; Ducombs G; Lachapelle JM; Menné T; Rycroft RJ; Wahlberg JE; White IR
Contact Dermatitis; 1989 Nov; 21(5):351. PubMed ID: 2620518
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. False-positive, follicular and irritant patch test reactions to metal salts.
Fischer T; Rystedt I
Contact Dermatitis; 1985 Feb; 12(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 3157537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The significance of chromate ingestion in patients allergic to chromate.
Kaaber K; Veien NK
Acta Derm Venereol; 1977; 57(4):321-3. PubMed ID: 70924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sensitivity to dichromate in a milk analysis laboratory.
Huriez C; Martin P; Lefebvre M
Contact Dermatitis; 1975 Aug; 1(4):247-8. PubMed ID: 139231
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Low incidence of occupational dermatitis from chromate.
van Ketel WG
Contact Dermatitis; 1984 Apr; 10(4):249. PubMed ID: 6234139
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Milk tester's dermatitis.
Herzog J; Dunne J; Aber R; Claver M; Marks JG
J Am Acad Dermatol; 1988 Sep; 19(3):503-8. PubMed ID: 2971694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Atomic-absorption spectrophotometric determinations in quantitative problems of animal experimental sensitization. 2: Sensitization studies with potassium bichromate].
Bandemir B; Ziegler V; Kipping D; Ebert E; Haustein UF
Dermatol Monatsschr; 1977 May; 163(5):392-8. PubMed ID: 881087
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Hypersensitivity to the most common allergens in workers of the drug industry].
Rudzki E; Stawarska D; Napiórkowska T; Rebandel P
Przegl Dermatol; 1981; 68(4):463-6. PubMed ID: 6460269
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
