These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38360118)

  • 1. Diagnostic yield of endoscopic and EUS-guided biopsy techniques in subepithelial lesions of the upper GI tract: a systematic review.
    Verloop CA; Goos JAC; Bruno MJ; Quispel R; van Driel LMJW; Hol L
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2024 Jun; 99(6):895-911.e13. PubMed ID: 38360118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative diagnostic yield of different endoscopic techniques for tissue sampling of upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions: a network meta-analysis.
    Facciorusso A; Crinò SF; Fugazza A; Carrara S; Spadaccini M; Colombo M; Ramai D; Mangiavillano B; Chandan S; Gkolfakis P; Mohan B; Hassan C; Repici A
    Endoscopy; 2024 Jan; 56(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 37591258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of FNA and fine-needle biopsy for EUS-guided sampling of suspected GI stromal tumors.
    El Chafic AH; Loren D; Siddiqui A; Mounzer R; Cosgrove N; Kowalski T
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Sep; 86(3):510-515. PubMed ID: 28131864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Utility of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) for diagnosing small subepithelial lesions (< 20 mm).
    Sekine M; Miura T; Fujiwara J; Uehara T; Asano T; Matsumoto S; Miyatani H; Mashima H
    J Ultrasound; 2022 Mar; 25(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 33511507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mucosal incision-assisted biopsy versus endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration with a rapid on-site evaluation for gastric subepithelial lesions: A randomized cross-over study.
    Osoegawa T; Minoda Y; Ihara E; Komori K; Aso A; Goto A; Itaba S; Ogino H; Nakamura K; Harada N; Makihara K; Tsuruta S; Yamamoto H; Ogawa Y
    Dig Endosc; 2019 Jul; 31(4):413-421. PubMed ID: 30723945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided needle sampling for upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions: a meta-analysis.
    Zhang XC; Li QL; Yu YF; Yao LQ; Xu MD; Zhang YQ; Zhong YS; Chen WF; Zhou PH
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Jun; 30(6):2431-41. PubMed ID: 26310529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison between endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy and bite-on-bite jumbo biopsy for sampling of subepithelial lesions.
    Facciorusso A; Crinò SF; Ramai D; Ofosu A; Muscatiello N; Mangiavillano B; Lamonaca L; Lisotti A; Fusaroli P; Gkolfakis P; Stasi E; Samanta J; Dhar J; Cotsoglou C; Castillo JL; Antonini F
    Dig Liver Dis; 2022 May; 54(5):676-683. PubMed ID: 35264310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. High clinical impact and diagnostic accuracy of EUS-guided biopsy sampling of subepithelial lesions: a prospective, comparative study.
    Hedenström P; Marschall HU; Nilsson B; Demir A; Lindkvist B; Nilsson O; Sadik R
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Mar; 32(3):1304-1313. PubMed ID: 28812151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Superiority of mucosal incision-assisted biopsy over ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in diagnosing small gastric subepithelial lesions: a propensity score matching analysis.
    Minoda Y; Chinen T; Osoegawa T; Itaba S; Haraguchi K; Akiho H; Aso A; Sumida Y; Komori K; Ogino H; Ihara E; Ogawa Y
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2020 Jan; 20(1):19. PubMed ID: 31964357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle biopsy in upper gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors measuring 2-5 cm in size.
    Joo DC; Kim GH; Lee MW; Lee BE; Baek DH; Song GA
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Nov; 36(11):8060-8066. PubMed ID: 35441867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine needle biopsy (FNB) in the diagnosis of solid lesions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Wang J; Wu X; Yin P; Guo Q; Hou W; Li Y; Wang Y; Cheng B
    Trials; 2016 Apr; 17():198. PubMed ID: 27071386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Comparative Study of the Diagnostic Utility of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (EUS-FNA) versus Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy (EUS-FNB) in Pancreatic and Non-Pancreatic Lesions.
    Yousri M; Abusinna E; Tahoun N; Okasha HH; El-Habashi AH
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2022 Jun; 23(6):2151-2158. PubMed ID: 35763660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical efficacy and safety of mucosal incision-assisted biopsy for the diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Dhaliwal A; Kolli S; Dhindsa BS; Devani K; Ramai D; Sayles H; Rangray R; Bhat I; Singh S; Adler DG
    Ann Gastroenterol; 2020; 33(2):155-161. PubMed ID: 32127736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mucosal incision-assisted biopsy versus endoscopic ultrasound-assisted tissue acquisition for subepithelial lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Giri S; Afzalpurkar S; Angadi S; Sundaram S
    Clin Endosc; 2022 Sep; 55(5):615-625. PubMed ID: 36205045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Endoscopic ultrasound with combined fine needle aspiration plus biopsy improves diagnostic yield in solid pancreatic masses.
    Gonzalez A; Wadhwa V; Singh H; Khan S; Gupta K; Liang H; Hussain I; Vargo J; Jang S; Chahal P; Bhatt A; Siddiki H; Erim T; Sanaka MR
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2022 May; 57(5):610-617. PubMed ID: 34991430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Endoscopic management of subepithelial lesions including neuroendocrine neoplasms: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline.
    Deprez PH; Moons LMG; OʼToole D; Gincul R; Seicean A; Pimentel-Nunes P; Fernández-Esparrach G; Polkowski M; Vieth M; Borbath I; Moreels TG; Nieveen van Dijkum E; Blay JY; van Hooft JE
    Endoscopy; 2022 Apr; 54(4):412-429. PubMed ID: 35180797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology versus endoscopic biopsy for the diagnosis of subepithelial lesions of the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract: A 10-year retrospective single institution analysis.
    Collins K; Yocum BP; Mesa H; Cramer H; Saeed O
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2023 Jul; 51(7):434-440. PubMed ID: 37021663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Touch imprint cytology on endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy provides comparable sample quality and diagnostic yield to standard endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration specimens in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions.
    Crinò SF; Larghi A; Bernardoni L; Parisi A; Frulloni L; Gabbrielli A; Parcesepe P; Scarpa A; Manfrin E
    Cytopathology; 2019 Mar; 30(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 30484917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling versus FNA in the diagnosis of subepithelial lesions: a large multicenter study.
    de Moura DTH; McCarty TR; Jirapinyo P; Ribeiro IB; Flumignan VK; Najdawai F; Ryou M; Lee LS; Thompson CC
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Jul; 92(1):108-119.e3. PubMed ID: 32105712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pretherapeutic evaluation of patients with upper gastrointestinal tract cancer using endoscopic and laparoscopic ultrasonography.
    Mortensen MB
    Dan Med J; 2012 Dec; 59(12):B4568. PubMed ID: 23290296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.