These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38360286)

  • 1. Outcomes of Metaphyseal Cones and Stem Fixation Following Rotating Hinge in Complex Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
    Lizcano JD; Goh GS; Kohli M; Deirmengian GK; Arsoy D; Courtney PM
    J Arthroplasty; 2024 Aug; 39(8S1):S248-S255. PubMed ID: 38360286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Survivorship and Radiographic Evaluation of Metaphyseal Cones With Short Cemented Stems in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
    Behery OA; Shing EZ; Yu Z; Springer BD; Fehring TK; Otero JE
    J Arthroplasty; 2022 Feb; 37(2):330-335. PubMed ID: 34742873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Porous Tantalum Metaphyseal Cones for Severe Femoral and Tibial Bone Defects in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty are Reliable for Fixation at Mean 5-Year Follow-Up.
    Kayani B; Howard LC; Neufeld ME; Greidanus NV; Masri BA; Garbuz DS
    J Arthroplasty; 2024 Sep; 39(9S2):S374-S379. PubMed ID: 38508344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is hybrid fixation in revision TKA using LCCK prostheses reliable?
    Laudren A; Delacroix R; Huten D
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2023 Sep; 109(5):103583. PubMed ID: 36878283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do Metaphyseal Cones and Stems Provide Any Biomechanical Advantage for Moderate Contained Tibial Defects in Revision TKA? A Finite-Element Analysis Based on a Cadaver Model.
    Quevedo González FJ; Meyers KN; Schraut N; Mehrotra KG; Lipman JD; Wright TM; Ast MP
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Nov; 479(11):2534-2546. PubMed ID: 34351312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-Term Results After Total Knee Arthroplasty with Contemporary Rotating-Hinge Prostheses.
    Cottino U; Abdel MP; Perry KI; Mara KC; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 Feb; 99(4):324-330. PubMed ID: 28196034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Varus-valgus constraint in 416 revision total knee arthroplasties with cemented stems provides a reliable reconstruction with a low subsequent revision rate at early to mid-term review.
    Limberg AK; Tibbo ME; Pagnano MW; Perry KI; Hanssen AD; Abdel MP
    Bone Joint J; 2020 Apr; 102-B(4):458-462. PubMed ID: 32228079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical Survivorship of Aseptic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Hinged Knees and Tantalum Cones at Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up.
    Abdelaziz H; Jaramillo R; Gehrke T; Ohlmeier M; Citak M
    J Arthroplasty; 2019 Dec; 34(12):3018-3022. PubMed ID: 31351856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 3D-printed titanium metaphyseal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty with cemented and cementless stems.
    Anderson LA; Christie M; Blackburn BE; Mahan C; Earl C; Pelt CE; Peters CL; Gililland J
    Bone Joint J; 2021 Jun; 103-B(6 Supple A):150-157. PubMed ID: 34053297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 3D-Printed Metaphyseal Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasties: Excellent Survivorship of 740 Cones at 5 Years.
    Carender CN; Bothun CE; Taunton MJ; Perry KI; Bedard NA; Pagnano MW; Abdel MP
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2024 Sep; 106(18):1688-1696. PubMed ID: 38875316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diaphyseal Impaction Grafting Combined with Metaphyseal Cones: Outcomes in 88 Revision Total Knee Arthroplasties.
    Bedard NA; Dugdale EM; Couch CC; Lewallen DG; Sierra RJ; Berry DJ; Abdel MP
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2024 Jul; 106(14):1293-1299. PubMed ID: 38691581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Excellent two-year survivorship of 3D-printed metaphyseal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty.
    Tetreault MW; Perry KI; Pagnano MW; Hanssen AD; Abdel MP
    Bone Joint J; 2020 Jun; 102-B(6_Supple_A):107-115. PubMed ID: 32475272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Total knee arthroplasty revision with trabecular tantalum cones: Preliminary retrospective study of 51 patients from two centres with a minimal 2-year follow-up.
    Girerd D; Parratte S; Lunebourg A; Boureau F; Ollivier M; Pasquier G; Putman S; Migaud H; Argenson JN
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2016 Jun; 102(4):429-33. PubMed ID: 27052939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Porous Tantalum Tibial Metaphyseal Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Excellent 10-Year Survivorship.
    Hadley ML; Harmer JR; Wright BH; Larson DR; Abdel MP; Berry DJ; Lewallen DG
    J Arthroplasty; 2024 Aug; 39(8S1):S263-S269. PubMed ID: 38677340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Outcomes of a technique combining diaphyseal impaction grafting and metaphyseal cones for severe bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty.
    Bedard NA; Cates RA; Lewallen DG; Sierra RJ; Hanssen AD; Berry DJ; Abdel MP
    Bone Joint J; 2020 Jun; 102-B(6_Supple_A):116-122. PubMed ID: 32475283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Superior Survival of Fully Cemented Fixation Compared to Hybrid Fixation in a Single Design Rotating Hinge Knee Implant.
    van Laarhoven SN; van Eerden AHJ; van Hellemondt GG; Schreurs BW; Wymenga AB; Heesterbeek PJC
    J Arthroplasty; 2022 Mar; 37(3):482-487. PubMed ID: 34864066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Novel metaphyseal porous titanium cones allow favorable outcomes in revision total knee arthroplasty.
    Shichman I; Oakley C; Willems JH; van Hellemondt GG; Heesterbeek P; Rozell J; Marwin S; Schwarzkopf R
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2023 Mar; 143(3):1537-1547. PubMed ID: 36243781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rotating-hinge prosthesis for aseptic revision knee arthroplasty: A multicentre retrospective study of 127 cases with a mean follow-up of five years.
    Houfani F; Mainard D; Rubens-Duval B; Papin PE; Pasquier G; Ehlinger M;
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2021 May; 107(3):102855. PubMed ID: 33581278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. High Survivorship of Short-Cemented Femoral Stems in Condylar Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Without Significant Metaphyseal Bone Loss: Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up.
    Matar HE; Bloch BV; James PJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2021 Oct; 36(10):3543-3550. PubMed ID: 34183212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Results of press-fit stems in revision knee arthroplasties.
    Wood GC; Naudie DD; MacDonald SJ; McCalden RW; Bourne RB
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2009 Mar; 467(3):810-7. PubMed ID: 19034597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.