These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38360562)

  • 1. No pupillometric evidence for effortful proactive control in the proportion-congruent Stroop paradigm.
    Hasshim N; Carruthers M; Ferrand L; Augustinova M; Parris BA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2024 Mar; ():17470218241235671. PubMed ID: 38360562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Proactive and reactive cognitive control in the absence of learning and memory confounds: Evidence from a cross-modal trial-unique Stroop task.
    Brosowsky NP
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2024 Dec; 78(4):245-255. PubMed ID: 38602812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Proactive control in the Stroop task: A conflict-frequency manipulation free of item-specific, contingency-learning, and color-word correlation confounds.
    Spinelli G; Lupker SJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Oct; 47(10):1550-1562. PubMed ID: 32150437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robust evidence for proactive conflict adaptation in the proportion-congruent paradigm.
    Spinelli G; Lupker SJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 May; 49(5):675-700. PubMed ID: 35787140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Congruency precues moderate item-specific proportion congruency effects.
    Hutchison KA; Bugg JM; Lim YB; Olsen MR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 May; 78(4):1087-103. PubMed ID: 26860710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Generalizing attentional control across dimensions and tasks: evidence from transfer of proportion-congruent effects.
    Wühr P; Duthoo W; Notebaert W
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(4):779-801. PubMed ID: 25380403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of arousal on cognitive control: empirical tests of the conflict-modulated Hebbian-learning hypothesis.
    Brown SB; van Steenbergen H; Kedar T; Nieuwenhuis S
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2014; 8():23. PubMed ID: 24523690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of contingency and correlation in the Stroop task.
    Hasshim N; Parris BA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Oct; 74(10):1657-1668. PubMed ID: 34190618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of conflict trial proportion: A comparison of the Eriksen and Simon tasks.
    Bausenhart KM; Ulrich R; Miller J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Feb; 83(2):810-836. PubMed ID: 33269440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Control in context: The theta rhythm provides evidence for reactive control but no evidence for proactive control.
    Mendl J; Banerjee S; Fischer R; Dreisbach G; Köster M
    Psychophysiology; 2024 Oct; 61(10):e14625. PubMed ID: 38837767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Context-specific proportion congruent effects: Compound-cue contingency learning in disguise.
    Schmidt JR; Lemercier C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 May; 72(5):1119-1130. PubMed ID: 29926760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating the learning of stimulus-control associations through incidental memory of reinforcement events.
    Bejjani C; Egner T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Oct; 47(10):1599-1621. PubMed ID: 34498904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attention modulation by proportion congruency: the asymmetrical list shifting effect.
    Abrahamse EL; Duthoo W; Notebaert W; Risko EF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1552-62. PubMed ID: 23565794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Both task-irrelevant and task-relevant information trigger reactive conflict adaptation in the item-specific proportion-congruent paradigm.
    Spinelli G; Morton JB; Lupker SJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Dec; 29(6):2133-2145. PubMed ID: 35768659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. ERP Evidence for Implicit Priming of Top-Down Control of Attention.
    Blais C; Hubbard E; Mangun GR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 May; 28(5):763-72. PubMed ID: 26765945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Finding an interaction between Stroop congruency and flanker congruency requires a large congruency effect: A within-trial combination of conflict tasks.
    Rey-Mermet A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2271-2301. PubMed ID: 31974936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contingency learning on the proportional congruency effect of the Stroop task is manifest in deviant processing.
    Suzuki K
    Neuroreport; 2024 Feb; 35(3):170-174. PubMed ID: 38141012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Context Modulates Congruency Effects in Selective Attention to Social Cues.
    Ravagli A; Marini F; Marino BFM; Ricciardelli P
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():940. PubMed ID: 29946281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Target-distractor correlation does not imply causation of the Stroop effect.
    Spinelli G; Lupker SJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Jun; ():17470218231182854. PubMed ID: 37287129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Going, going, gone? Proactive control prevents the congruency sequence effect from rapid decay.
    Duthoo W; Abrahamse EL; Braem S; Notebaert W
    Psychol Res; 2014 Jul; 78(4):483-93. PubMed ID: 24077774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.