These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38361098)

  • 1. A Mixture Fluency model using responses and response times with cognitive diagnosis model framework.
    Liu Z; Wang S; Zhang S; Qiu T
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Apr; 56(4):3396-3451. PubMed ID: 38361098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A mixture model for responses and response times with a higher-order ability structure to detect rapid guessing behaviour.
    Lu J; Wang C; Zhang J; Tao J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 May; 73(2):261-288. PubMed ID: 31385609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A mixture hierarchical model for response times and response accuracy.
    Wang C; Xu G
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2015 Nov; 68(3):456-77. PubMed ID: 25873487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A hierarchical latent response model for inferences about examinee engagement in terms of guessing and item-level non-response.
    Ulitzsch E; von Davier M; Pohl S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Nov; 73 Suppl 1():83-112. PubMed ID: 31709521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using Response Times and Response Accuracy to Measure Fluency Within Cognitive Diagnosis Models.
    Wang S; Chen Y
    Psychometrika; 2020 Sep; 85(3):600-629. PubMed ID: 32816238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robust estimation of the hierarchical model for responses and response times.
    Ranger J; Wolgast A; Kuhn JT
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2019 Feb; 72(1):83-107. PubMed ID: 30051905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Mixture Response Time Process Model for Aberrant Behaviors and Item Nonresponses.
    Lu J; Wang C; Shi N
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2023; 58(1):71-89. PubMed ID: 34355994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Person-Level Analysis of the Effect of Cognitive Loading by Question Difficulty and Question Time Intensity on Didactic Examination Fluency (Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff).
    Thompson JJ
    J Appl Meas; 2018; 19(3):229-242. PubMed ID: 30169332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rasch modeling of accuracy and confidence measures from cognitive tests.
    Paek I; Lee J; Stankov L; Wilson M
    J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(3):232-48. PubMed ID: 23816612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cognitive diagnosis models for multiple strategies.
    Ma W; Guo W
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2019 May; 72(2):370-392. PubMed ID: 30756389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using Response Times to Model Not-Reached Items due to Time Limits.
    Pohl S; Ulitzsch E; von Davier M
    Psychometrika; 2019 Sep; 84(3):892-920. PubMed ID: 31054065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A diagnostic tree model for polytomous responses with multiple strategies.
    Ma W
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2019 Feb; 72(1):61-82. PubMed ID: 29687453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spontaneous and imposed speed of cognitive test responses.
    De Boeck P; Chen H; Davison M
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 May; 70(2):225-237. PubMed ID: 28474767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving precision of ability estimation: Getting more from response times.
    Bolsinova M; Tijmstra J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 Feb; 71(1):13-38. PubMed ID: 28635139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Changes in the Speed-Ability Relation Through Different Treatments of Rapid Guessing.
    Deribo T; Goldhammer F; Kroehne U
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2023 Jun; 83(3):473-494. PubMed ID: 37187694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modeling Differences Between Response Times of Correct and Incorrect Responses.
    Bolsinova M; Tijmstra J
    Psychometrika; 2019 Dec; 84(4):1018-1046. PubMed ID: 31463656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hierarchical diagnostic classification models: a family of models for estimating and testing attribute hierarchies.
    Templin J; Bradshaw L
    Psychometrika; 2014 Apr; 79(2):317-39. PubMed ID: 24478021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Utilizing response times in cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing under the higher-order deterministic input, noisy 'and' gate model.
    Huang HY
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Feb; 73(1):109-141. PubMed ID: 30793768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A semi-parametric within-subject mixture approach to the analyses of responses and response times.
    Molenaar D; Bolsinova M; Vermunt JK
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 May; 71(2):205-228. PubMed ID: 29044460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modeling Rapid Guessing Behaviors in Computer-Based Testlet Items.
    Jin KY; Hsu CL; Chiu MM; Chen PH
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2023 Jan; 47(1):19-33. PubMed ID: 36425284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.