158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38361106)
1. Information entropy facilitates (not impedes) lexical processing during language comprehension.
Karimi H; Weber P; Zinn J
Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38361106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lexical Predictability During Natural Reading: Effects of Surprisal and Entropy Reduction.
Lowder MW; Choi W; Ferreira F; Henderson JM
Cogn Sci; 2018 Jun; 42 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):1166-1183. PubMed ID: 29442360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Semantic Predictability Facilitates Comprehension of Degraded Speech in a Graded Manner.
Bhandari P; Demberg V; Kray J
Front Psychol; 2021; 12():714485. PubMed ID: 34566795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lexical Frequency and Sentence Context Influence the Brain's Response to Single Words.
Huizeling E; Arana S; Hagoort P; Schoffelen JM
Neurobiol Lang (Camb); 2022; 3(1):149-179. PubMed ID: 37215333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Seeing words in context: the interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading.
Hoeks JC; Stowe LA; Doedens G
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Mar; 19(1):59-73. PubMed ID: 14972359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diving into a pool or volcano? Examining the influence of sentence context and task demands on sentence reading in younger and older adults.
Haigh P; Hanif N; de Bruin A
PLoS One; 2022; 17(12):e0279555. PubMed ID: 36584104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Morphosyntactic but not lexical corpus-based probabilities can substitute for cloze probabilities in reading experiments.
Lopukhina A; Lopukhin K; Laurinavichyute A
PLoS One; 2021; 16(1):e0246133. PubMed ID: 33508029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of decay and lexical uncertainty on processing long-distance dependencies in reading.
Stone K; von der Malsburg T; Vasishth S
PeerJ; 2020; 8():e10438. PubMed ID: 33362963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Uncertainty and Expectation in Sentence Processing: Evidence From Subcategorization Distributions.
Linzen T; Jaeger TF
Cogn Sci; 2016 Aug; 40(6):1382-411. PubMed ID: 26286681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Language Models Explain Word Reading Times Better Than Empirical Predictability.
Hofmann MJ; Remus S; Biemann C; Radach R; Kuchinke L
Front Artif Intell; 2021; 4():730570. PubMed ID: 35187472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Word's Predictability Can Modulate Semantic Preview Effect in High-Constraint Sentences.
Xu L; Liu S; Wang S; Sun D; Li N
Front Psychol; 2022; 13():849351. PubMed ID: 35401306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prior Context and Individual Alpha Frequency Influence Predictive Processing during Language Comprehension.
Jano S; Cross Z; Chatburn A; Schlesewsky M; Bornkessel-Schlesewsky I
J Cogn Neurosci; 2024 May; ():1-39. PubMed ID: 38820550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predicting language: MEG evidence for lexical preactivation.
Dikker S; Pylkkänen L
Brain Lang; 2013 Oct; 127(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 23040469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The time course of contextual effects on visual word recognition.
Lee CY; Liu YN; Tsai JL
Front Psychol; 2012; 3():285. PubMed ID: 22934087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Completion norms for 3085 English sentence contexts.
Peelle JE; Miller RL; Rogers CS; Spehar B; Sommers MS; Van Engen KJ
Behav Res Methods; 2020 Aug; 52(4):1795-1799. PubMed ID: 31993960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Semantic constraint, reading control, and the granularity of form-based expectations during semantic processing: Evidence from ERPs.
Bulkes NZ; Christianson K; Tanner D
Neuropsychologia; 2020 Feb; 137():107294. PubMed ID: 31821830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating information-theoretic measures of word prediction in naturalistic sentence reading.
Aurnhammer C; Frank SL
Neuropsychologia; 2019 Nov; 134():107198. PubMed ID: 31553896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Limits on lexical prediction during reading.
Luke SG; Christianson K
Cogn Psychol; 2016 Aug; 88():22-60. PubMed ID: 27376659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Word predictability effects are linear, not logarithmic: Implications for probabilistic models of sentence comprehension.
Brothers T; Kuperberg GR
J Mem Lang; 2021 Feb; 116():. PubMed ID: 33100508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predictability and novelty in literal language comprehension: an ERP study.
Davenport T; Coulson S
Brain Res; 2011 Oct; 1418():70-82. PubMed ID: 21925647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
