BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38361442)

  • 1. A concise review of the correspondence between the traditional functional analysis and alternative assessment formats.
    Rahaman JA; Fahmie TA; Melanson IJ; DeBrine JE; Zangrillo AN
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2024 Mar; 57(2):515-520. PubMed ID: 38361442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of Clinician Predictions of Future Self-Harm: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Predictive Studies.
    Woodford R; Spittal MJ; Milner A; McGill K; Kapur N; Pirkis J; Mitchell A; Carter G
    Suicide Life Threat Behav; 2019 Feb; 49(1):23-40. PubMed ID: 28972271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predictive properties of risk assessment instruments following self-harm.
    Owens D; Kelley R
    Br J Psychiatry; 2017 Jun; 210(6):384-386. PubMed ID: 28572432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Integration of experimental functional analysis procedural advancements: Progressing from brief to extended experimental analyses.
    Henry JE; Kelley ME; LaRue RH; Kettering TL; Gadaire DM; Sloman KN
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2021 Jun; 54(3):1045-1061. PubMed ID: 33914341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficiency in functional analysis of problem behavior: A quantitative and qualitative review.
    Saini V; Fisher WW; Retzlaff BJ; Keevy M
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2020 Jan; 53(1):44-66. PubMed ID: 31162670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Aberrant Behavior Checklist and the Behavior Problems Inventory: convergent and divergent validity.
    Rojahn J; Aman MG; Matson JL; Mayville E
    Res Dev Disabil; 2003; 24(5):391-404. PubMed ID: 12951135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The safety of functional analyses of self-injurious behavior.
    Kahng S; Hausman NL; Fisher AB; Donaldson JM; Cox JR; Lugo M; Wiskow KM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2015; 48(1):107-14. PubMed ID: 25293835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The use of machine learning in the study of suicidal and non-suicidal self-injurious thoughts and behaviors: A systematic review.
    Burke TA; Ammerman BA; Jacobucci R
    J Affect Disord; 2019 Feb; 245():869-884. PubMed ID: 30699872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measuring the urge to self-injure: preliminary data from a clinical sample.
    Washburn JJ; Juzwin KR; Styer DM; Aldridge D
    Psychiatry Res; 2010 Aug; 178(3):540-4. PubMed ID: 20580437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Skin Picking Impact Scale (SPIS): scale development and psychometric analyses.
    Keuthen NJ; Deckersbach T; Wilhelm S; Engelhard I; Forker A; O'Sullivan RL; Jenike MA; Baer L
    Psychosomatics; 2001; 42(5):397-403. PubMed ID: 11739906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predictive validity of the HCR-20 for inpatient self-harm.
    O'Shea LE; Picchioni MM; Mason FL; Sugarman PA; Dickens GL
    Compr Psychiatry; 2014 Nov; 55(8):1937-49. PubMed ID: 25104612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Toward Maximizing Assessment Efficiency: A Synthesized Trial-Based Functional Analysis and Competing Stimulus Assessment.
    Shawler LA; Castaneda-Velazquez G; Lafo G
    Behav Sci (Basel); 2024 Apr; 14(5):. PubMed ID: 38785863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correspondence between traditional models of functional analysis and a functional analysis of manding behavior.
    LaRue RH; Sloman KN; Weiss MJ; Delmolino L; Hansford A; Szalony J; Madigan R; Lambright NM
    Res Dev Disabil; 2011; 32(6):2449-57. PubMed ID: 21821393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving the Efficiency and Quality of the Value Assessment Process for Companion Diagnostic Tests: The Companion test Assessment Tool (CAT).
    Canestaro WJ; Pritchard DE; Garrison LP; Dubois R; Veenstra DL
    J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2015 Aug; 21(8):700-12. PubMed ID: 26233542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multiple-respondent anecdotal assessments: an analysis of interrater agreement and correspondence with analogue assessment outcomes.
    Smith CM; Smith RG; Dracobly JD; Pace AP
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2012; 45(4):779-95. PubMed ID: 23322932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improving the design of the assessment of emergency department patients at risk for self-harm.
    Gaddis GM
    Ann Emerg Med; 2006 Oct; 48(4):467-9. PubMed ID: 16997685
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The development of a population-level clinical screening tool for self-harm repetition and suicide: the ReACT Self-Harm Rule.
    Steeg S; Kapur N; Webb R; Applegate E; Stewart SL; Hawton K; Bergen H; Waters K; Cooper J
    Psychol Med; 2012 Nov; 42(11):2383-94. PubMed ID: 22394511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Short term risk of non-fatal and fatal suicidal behaviours: the predictive validity of the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale in a Swedish adult psychiatric population with a recent episode of self-harm.
    Lindh ÅU; Waern M; Beckman K; Renberg ES; Dahlin M; Runeson B
    BMC Psychiatry; 2018 Oct; 18(1):319. PubMed ID: 30285661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Risk assessment of self- and other-directed aggression in adolescent psychiatric inpatient units.
    Phillips NL; Stargatt R; Brown A
    Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 2012 Jan; 46(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 22247092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of self-injurious thoughts using a behavioral test.
    Nock MK; Banaji MR
    Am J Psychiatry; 2007 May; 164(5):820-3. PubMed ID: 17475742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.