150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38363448)
1. Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of MR dacryocystography (MRD) and dacryoscintigraphy (DSG) in NLDO-related acquired epiphora.
Aslanduz AA; Mahmoudian B; Sadigh AL; Nahchami E; Jahanshahi A
Int Ophthalmol; 2024 Feb; 44(1):88. PubMed ID: 38363448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. MR dacryocystography: comparison with dacryocystography and CT dacryocystography.
Manfrè L; de Maria M; Todaro E; Mangiameli A; Ponte F; Lagalla R
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2000; 21(6):1145-50. PubMed ID: 10871030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Lacrimal imaging findings in fellow asymptomatic eyes of unilateral epiphora.
Macri C; Shapira Y; Selva D
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2022 Nov; 32(6):3328-3332. PubMed ID: 35261267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Pilot Study of Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Dacryocystography Imaging to Assess Functional Epiphora.
Macri CZ; Shapira Y; Tong J; Hood K; Drivas P; Patel S; Selva D
Semin Ophthalmol; 2024 Feb; 39(2):158-164. PubMed ID: 37697818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical utility of SPECT/CT and CT-dacryocystography-enhanced dacryoscintigraphy in the imaging of lacrimal drainage system obstruction.
Barna S; Garai I; Kukuts K; Gesztelyi R; Toth L; Kemeny-Beke A
Ann Nucl Med; 2019 Oct; 33(10):746-754. PubMed ID: 31313247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Syringing has limited reliability in differentiating nasolacrimal duct stenosis from functional delay.
Shapira Y; Juniat V; Macri C; Selva D
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2022 Sep; 260(9):3037-3042. PubMed ID: 35460361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance dacryocystography in patients with epiphora.
Kirchhof K; Hähnel S; Jansen O; Zake S; Sartor K
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2000; 24(2):327-31. PubMed ID: 10752902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Functional Versus Anatomical Nasolacrimal Obstruction: Are There Differences in Epiphora Severity, Symptoms, or Effects on Quality of Life?
Shapira Y; Macri C; Selva D
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Nov-Dec 01; 38(6):567-570. PubMed ID: 35502798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interobserver agreement on interpretation of conventional dacryocystography and dacryoscintigraphy findings: A retrospective single-centre study.
Sia PI; Curragh D; Howell S; Selva D
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2019 Aug; 47(6):713-717. PubMed ID: 30866143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Functional epiphora: an under-reported entity.
Usmani E; Shapira Y; Selva D
Int Ophthalmol; 2023 Aug; 43(8):2687-2693. PubMed ID: 36952153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dacryoscintigraphy: an effective tool in the evaluation of postoperative epiphora.
Palaniswamy SS; Subramanyam P
Nucl Med Commun; 2012 Mar; 33(3):262-7. PubMed ID: 22186907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [A comparative study of lacrimal magnetic resonance hydrography and lacrimal endoscopy examination in the diagnosis and treatment of lacrimal duct obstructive diseases].
Xiang N; Liu R; Zhang SJ; Hu WK; Zhan XY; Luo B; Ai T
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Feb; 52(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 26906707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. DCR for nasolacrimal duct stenosis may be less effective than for complete obstruction.
Shapira Y; Macri C; Usmani E; Davis G; Selva D
Eye (Lond); 2023 Mar; 37(4):760-763. PubMed ID: 35397663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nasolacrimal system: evaluation with gadolinium-enhanced MR dacryocystography with a three-dimensional fast spoiled gradient-recalled technique.
Karagülle T; Erden A; Erden I; Zilelioğlu G
Eur Radiol; 2002 Sep; 12(9):2343-8. PubMed ID: 12195493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Degree of agreement between dacryoscintigraphy and dacryocystography examinations results in primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
Aditya E; Irawati Y; Zulkarnaien B; Prihartono J
Nucl Med Rev Cent East Eur; 2022; 25(1):12-17. PubMed ID: 35137932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MR dacryocystography: comparison with dacryoendoscopy in positional diagnosis of nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
Higashi H; Tamada T; Mizukawa K; Ito K
Radiol Med; 2016 Jul; 121(7):580-7. PubMed ID: 27048401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Non-contrast MR dacryocystography for the evaluation of epiphora and recurrent dacryocystitis: A preliminary study.
Cè M; Grimaldi E; Toto-Brocchi M; Martinenghi C; Oliva G; Felisaz PF; Schiavo P; Lunardi G; Cellina M
Neuroradiol J; 2023 Aug; 36(4):397-403. PubMed ID: 36404757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of epiphora by topical contrast-enhanced CT and MR dacryocystography: which one to choose?
Singla A; Ballal S; Guruvaiah N; Ponnatapura J
Acta Radiol; 2023 Mar; 64(3):1056-1061. PubMed ID: 35815704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Lacrimal sac dacryoliths: predictive factors and clinical characteristics.
Yazici B; Hammad AM; Meyer DR
Ophthalmology; 2001 Jul; 108(7):1308-12. PubMed ID: 11425692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of digital subtraction dacryocystography and dacryoendoscopy in patients with epiphora.
Bae SH; Park J; Lee JK
Eye (Lond); 2021 Mar; 35(3):877-882. PubMed ID: 32467631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
