164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38363499)
1. A critical view on using "life not worth living" in the bioethics of assisted reproduction.
Kandlbinder AE
Med Health Care Philos; 2024 Jun; 27(2):189-203. PubMed ID: 38363499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is selecting better than modifying? An investigation of arguments against germline gene editing as compared to preimplantation genetic diagnosis.
V Hammerstein AL; Eggel M; Biller-Andorno N
BMC Med Ethics; 2019 Nov; 20(1):83. PubMed ID: 31752935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Genome editing and assisted reproduction: curing embryos, society or prospective parents?
Cavaliere G
Med Health Care Philos; 2018 Jun; 21(2):215-225. PubMed ID: 28725950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Germline genome editing versus preimplantation genetic diagnosis: Is there a case in favour of germline interventions?
Ranisch R
Bioethics; 2020 Jan; 34(1):60-69. PubMed ID: 31448423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Affecting future individuals: Why and when germline genome editing entails a greater moral obligation towards progeny.
Battisti D
Bioethics; 2021 Jun; 35(5):487-495. PubMed ID: 33811352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Why Human Germline Editing is More Problematic than Selecting Between Embryos: Ethically Considering Intergenerational Relationships.
Rehmann-Sutter C
New Bioeth; 2018 Apr; 24(1):9-25. PubMed ID: 29529985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does bioethics provide answers?: Secular and religious bioethics and our procreative future.
Smolin DM
Cumberland Law Rev; 2004-2005; 35(3):473-517. PubMed ID: 16715560
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Moral philosophy and public policy: the case of NRTs.
Kymlicka W
Bioethics; 1993 Jan; 7(1):1-26. PubMed ID: 11654026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Moral reasons to edit the human genome: picking up from the Nuffield report.
Gyngell C; Bowman-Smart H; Savulescu J
J Med Ethics; 2019 Aug; 45(8):514-523. PubMed ID: 30679191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The complex nature of Jewish and Catholic bioethics.
Eberl JT
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Nov; 9(11):31-2. PubMed ID: 19882452
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Bioethics and human reproduction.
Schotsmans P
Bijdragen; 1989; 50():414-31. PubMed ID: 11659439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. To what do we have moral obligations and why? II.
Gillon R
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Jun; 290(6483):1734-6. PubMed ID: 3924233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Having a life versus being alive.
Kushner T
J Med Ethics; 1984 Mar; 10(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 6708064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is it ever morally permissible to select for deafness in one's child?
Wallis JM
Med Health Care Philos; 2020 Mar; 23(1):3-15. PubMed ID: 31542873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Attitudes, intentions and procreative responsibility in current and future assisted reproduction.
Battisti D
Bioethics; 2023 Jun; 37(5):449-461. PubMed ID: 36916879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimating Demand for Germline Genome Editing: An
Viotti M; Victor AR; Griffin DK; Groob JS; Brake AJ; Zouves CG; Barnes FL
CRISPR J; 2019 Oct; 2(5):304-315. PubMed ID: 31599685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Substance ontology cannot determine the moral status of embryos.
Morris J
J Med Philos; 2012 Aug; 37(4):331-50. PubMed ID: 22892242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Disputes over moral status: philosophy and science in the future of bioethics.
Bortolotti L
Health Care Anal; 2007 Jun; 15(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 17628931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. To what do we have moral obligations and why? I.
Gillon R
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Jun; 290(6482):1646-7. PubMed ID: 3924205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Genes, embryos, and future people.
Glannon W
Bioethics; 1998 Jul; 12(3):187-211. PubMed ID: 11656689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
