These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38363501)

  • 1. Pretesting Discrete-Choice Experiments: A Guide for Researchers.
    Campoamor NB; Guerrini CJ; Brooks WB; Bridges JFP; Crossnohere NL
    Patient; 2024 Mar; 17(2):109-120. PubMed ID: 38363501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Respondent Understanding in Discrete Choice Experiments: A Scoping Review.
    Pearce A; Harrison M; Watson V; Street DJ; Howard K; Bansback N; Bryan S
    Patient; 2021 Jan; 14(1):17-53. PubMed ID: 33141359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving the quality of discrete-choice experiments in health: how can we assess validity and reliability?
    Janssen EM; Marshall DA; Hauber AB; Bridges JFP
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2017 Dec; 17(6):531-542. PubMed ID: 29058478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A novel design process for selection of attributes for inclusion in discrete choice experiments: case study exploring variation in clinical decision-making about thrombolysis in the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke.
    De Brún A; Flynn D; Ternent L; Price CI; Rodgers H; Ford GA; Rudd M; Lancsar E; Simpson S; Teah J; Thomson RG
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Jun; 18(1):483. PubMed ID: 29929523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Choosing vs. allocating: discrete choice experiments and constant-sum paired comparisons for the elicitation of societal preferences.
    Skedgel CD; Wailoo AJ; Akehurst RL
    Health Expect; 2015 Oct; 18(5):1227-40. PubMed ID: 23758539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making: a user's guide.
    Lancsar E; Louviere J
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2008; 26(8):661-77. PubMed ID: 18620460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Methods for Conducting Stated Preference Research with Children and Adolescents in Health: A Scoping Review of the Application of Discrete Choice Experiments.
    Michaels-Igbokwe C; Currie GR; Kennedy BL; MacDonald KV; Marshall DA
    Patient; 2021 Nov; 14(6):741-758. PubMed ID: 34008164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing the impact of excluded attributes on choice in a discrete choice experiment using a follow-up question.
    Mansfield C; Sutphin J; Boeri M
    Health Econ; 2020 Oct; 29(10):1307-1315. PubMed ID: 32627284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Framework for Instrument Development of a Choice Experiment: An Application to Type 2 Diabetes.
    Janssen EM; Segal JB; Bridges JF
    Patient; 2016 Oct; 9(5):465-79. PubMed ID: 27120338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of attributes and attribute levels for a discrete choice experiment on patients' and providers' choice for antiretroviral therapy service in Northwest Ethiopia.
    Belay YA; Yitayal M; Atnafu A; Taye FA
    AIDS Res Ther; 2023 Jun; 20(1):33. PubMed ID: 37271808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An introduction to "discrete choice experiments" for behavior analysts.
    Friedel JE; Foreman AM; Wirth O
    Behav Processes; 2022 May; 198():104628. PubMed ID: 35354088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Designing Unforced Choice Experiments to Inform Health Care Decision Making: Implications of Using Opt-Out, Neither, or Status Quo Alternatives in Discrete Choice Experiments.
    Determann D; Gyrd-Hansen D; de Wit GA; de Bekker-Grob EW; Steyerberg EW; Lambooij MS; Bjørnskov Pedersen L
    Med Decis Making; 2019 Aug; 39(6):681-692. PubMed ID: 31354031
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How Are Debriefing Questions Used in Health Discrete Choice Experiments? An Online Survey.
    Pearce AM; Mulhern BJ; Watson V; Viney RC
    Value Health; 2020 Mar; 23(3):289-293. PubMed ID: 32197722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A systematic review of the reliability and validity of discrete choice experiments in valuing non-market environmental goods.
    Rakotonarivo OS; Schaafsma M; Hockley N
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Dec; 183():98-109. PubMed ID: 27576151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Decision-makers' preferences for approving new medicines in Wales: a discrete-choice experiment with assessment of external validity.
    Linley WG; Hughes DA
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2013 Apr; 31(4):345-55. PubMed ID: 23516033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Taking the Shortcut: Simplifying Heuristics in Discrete Choice Experiments.
    Veldwijk J; Marceta SM; Swait JD; Lipman SA; de Bekker-Grob EW
    Patient; 2023 Jul; 16(4):301-315. PubMed ID: 37129803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Collecting Physicians' Preferences on Medical Devices: Are We Doing It Right? Evidence from Italian Orthopedists Using 2 Different Stated Preference Methods.
    Armeni P; Meregaglia M; Borsoi L; Callea G; Torbica A; Benazzo F; Tarricone R
    Med Decis Making; 2023; 43(7-8):886-900. PubMed ID: 37837325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can healthcare choice be predicted using stated preference data?
    de Bekker-Grob EW; Donkers B; Bliemer MCJ; Veldwijk J; Swait JD
    Soc Sci Med; 2020 Feb; 246():112736. PubMed ID: 31887626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The application of discrete choice experiments eliciting young peoples' preferences for healthcare: a systematic literature review.
    Williams G; Kinchin I
    Eur J Health Econ; 2023 Aug; 24(6):987-998. PubMed ID: 36169764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Getting it right with discrete choice experiments: Are we hot or cold?
    Ozdemir S; Gonzalez JM; Bansal P; Huynh VA; Sng BL; Finkelstein E
    Soc Sci Med; 2024 May; 348():116850. PubMed ID: 38608481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.