These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38364040)

  • 1. Simulation of ultrasonic scattering from scatterer size distributions using Field II.
    Whitson HM; Rosado-Mendez IM; Hale JH; Hall TJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2024 Feb; 155(2):1406-1421. PubMed ID: 38364040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effective scatterer diameter estimates for broad scatterer size distributions.
    Nordberg EP; Hall TJ
    Ultrason Imaging; 2015 Jan; 37(1):3-21. PubMed ID: 24831300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantitative ultrasound estimates from populations of scatterers with continuous size distributions: effects of the size estimator algorithm.
    Lavarello R; Oelze M
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2012 Sep; 59(9):2066-76. PubMed ID: 23007782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Backscatter coefficient estimation using tapers with gaps.
    Luchies AC; Oelze ML
    Ultrason Imaging; 2015 Apr; 37(2):117-34. PubMed ID: 25189857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantitative ultrasound estimates from populations of scatterers with continuous size distributions.
    Lavarello R; Oelze M
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2011 Apr; 58(4):744-53. PubMed ID: 21507752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interlaboratory comparison of backscatter coefficient estimates for tissue-mimicking phantoms.
    Anderson JJ; Herd MT; King MR; Haak A; Hafez ZT; Song J; Oelze ML; Madsen EL; Zagzebski JA; O'Brien WD; Hall TJ
    Ultrason Imaging; 2010 Jan; 32(1):48-64. PubMed ID: 20690431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A dynamic ultrasound simulation of a pulsating three-layered CCA for validation of two-dimensional wall motion and blood velocity estimation algorithms.
    Hu X; Zhang Y; Cai G; Zhang K; Deng L; Gao L; Han S; Chen J
    Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 45(1):131-143. PubMed ID: 29148586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Techniques and evaluation from a cross-platform imaging comparison of quantitative ultrasound parameters in an in vivo rodent fibroadenoma model.
    Wirtzfeld LA; Nam K; Labyed Y; Ghoshal G; Haak A; Sen-Gupta E; He Z; Hirtz NR; Miller RJ; Sarwate S; Simpson DG; Zagzebski JA; Bigelow TA; Oelze M; Hall TJ; O'Brien WD
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2013 Jul; 60(7):1386-400. PubMed ID: 25004506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Trade-offs in data acquisition and processing parameters for backscatter and scatterer size estimations.
    Liu W; Zagzebski JA
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2010; 57(2):340-52. PubMed ID: 20178900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of differences in backscatter coefficients among four ultrasound scanners with different beamforming methods.
    Omura M; Hasegawa H; Nagaoka R; Yoshida K; Yamaguchi T
    J Med Ultrason (2001); 2020 Jan; 47(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 31679096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Locations of optimally matched Gabor atoms from ultrasound RF echoes for inter-scatterer spacing estimation.
    Zeng X; Zhang Y; Li Z; Yang J; Gao L; Zhang J
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Feb; 184():105281. PubMed ID: 31896058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantitative assessment of in vivo breast masses using ultrasound attenuation and backscatter.
    Nam K; Zagzebski JA; Hall TJ
    Ultrason Imaging; 2013 Apr; 35(2):146-61. PubMed ID: 23493613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A proposed microscopic elastic wave theory for ultrasonic backscatter from myocardial tissue.
    Rose JH; Kaufmann MR; Wickline SA; Hall CS; Miller JG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Jan; 97(1):656-68. PubMed ID: 7860840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantitative Ultrasound: Scattering Theory.
    Oelze M
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2023; 1403():19-28. PubMed ID: 37495912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A study on understanding the physical mechanism of change in ultrasonic envelope statistical property during temperature elevation.
    Omura M; Takeuchi M; Nagaoka R; Hasegawa H
    Med Phys; 2021 Jun; 48(6):3042-3054. PubMed ID: 33880793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acoustic backscatter and effective scatterer size estimates using a 2D CMUT transducer.
    Liu W; Zagzebski JA; Hall TJ; Madsen EL; Varghese T; Kliewer MA; Panda S; Lowery C; Barnes S
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Aug; 53(15):4169-83. PubMed ID: 18635893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of Scatterer Parameters From Ultrasound Scattering Models Taking Into Account Scattering From Nuclei and Cells of Cell-Pellet Biophantoms and Ex Vivo Tumors.
    Muleki-Seya P; O'Brien WD
    Ultrason Imaging; 2024 Jun; ():1617346241256120. PubMed ID: 38873927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A simulation environment for validating ultrasonic blood flow and vessel wall imaging based on fluid-structure interaction simulations: ultrasonic assessment of arterial distension and wall shear rate.
    Swillens A; Degroote J; Vierendeels J; Lovstakken L; Segers P
    Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4318-30. PubMed ID: 20879592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of Size Polydispersity and Dense Media on Quantitative Ultrasound Estimates.
    Lombard O; Franceschini E
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2024 May; 71(5):572-583. PubMed ID: 38526898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Frequency dependence of attenuation and backscatter coefficient of ex vivo human lymphedema dermis.
    Omura M; Yoshida K; Akita S; Yamaguchi T
    J Med Ultrason (2001); 2020 Jan; 47(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 31515646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.