These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38364309)

  • 1. Estimation of inbreeding and kinship coefficients via latent identity-by-descent states.
    Guan Y; Levy D
    Bioinformatics; 2024 Feb; 40(2):. PubMed ID: 38364309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An unbiased kinship estimation method for genetic data analysis.
    Jiang W; Zhang X; Li S; Song S; Zhao H
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Dec; 23(1):525. PubMed ID: 36474154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improved estimation of inbreeding and kinship in pigs using optimized SNP panels.
    Lopes MS; Silva FF; Harlizius B; Duijvesteijn N; Lopes PS; Guimarães SE; Knol EF
    BMC Genet; 2013 Sep; 14():92. PubMed ID: 24063757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Privacy-aware estimation of relatedness in admixed populations.
    Wang S; Kim M; Li W; Jiang X; Chen H; Harmanci A
    Brief Bioinform; 2022 Nov; 23(6):. PubMed ID: 36384083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of relationships between pigs based on pedigree and genomic information.
    Zhang J; Song H; Zhang Q; Ding X
    Animal; 2020 Apr; 14(4):697-705. PubMed ID: 31708004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rank-invariant estimation of inbreeding coefficients.
    Zhang QS; Goudet J; Weir BS
    Heredity (Edinb); 2022 Jan; 128(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 34824382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficient computation of the kinship coefficients.
    Kirkpatrick B; Ge S; Wang L
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Mar; 35(6):1002-1008. PubMed ID: 30165566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of kinship matrices on genetic gain and inbreeding with optimum contribution selection in a genomic dairy cattle breeding program.
    Gautason E; Sahana G; Guldbrandtsen B; Berg P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2023 Jul; 55(1):48. PubMed ID: 37460999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of rare alleles on estimated genomic relationships from whole genome sequence data.
    Eynard SE; Windig JJ; Leroy G; van Binsbergen R; Calus MP
    BMC Genet; 2015 Mar; 16():24. PubMed ID: 25887220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Trends in genome-wide and region-specific genetic diversity in the Dutch-Flemish Holstein-Friesian breeding program from 1986 to 2015.
    Doekes HP; Veerkamp RF; Bijma P; Hiemstra SJ; Windig JJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Apr; 50(1):15. PubMed ID: 29642838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Benchmarking kinship estimation tools for ancient genomes using pedigree simulations.
    Aktürk Ş; Mapelli I; Güler MN; Gürün K; Katırcıoğlu B; Vural KB; Sağlıcan E; Çetin M; Yaka R; Sürer E; Atağ G; Çokoğlu SS; Sevkar A; Altınışık NE; Koptekin D; Somel M
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2024 Jul; 24(5):e13960. PubMed ID: 38676702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimating kinship in admixed populations.
    Thornton T; Tang H; Hoffmann TJ; Ochs-Balcom HM; Caan BJ; Risch N
    Am J Hum Genet; 2012 Jul; 91(1):122-38. PubMed ID: 22748210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating FST and kinship for arbitrary population structures.
    Ochoa A; Storey JD
    PLoS Genet; 2021 Jan; 17(1):e1009241. PubMed ID: 33465078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimation of inbreeding using pedigree, 50k SNP chip genotypes and full sequence data in three cattle breeds.
    Zhang Q; Calus MP; Guldbrandtsen B; Lund MS; Sahana G
    BMC Genet; 2015 Jul; 16():88. PubMed ID: 26195126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Unified Characterization of Population Structure and Relatedness.
    Weir BS; Goudet J
    Genetics; 2017 Aug; 206(4):2085-2103. PubMed ID: 28550018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pedigrees or markers: Which are better in estimating relatedness and inbreeding coefficient?
    Wang J
    Theor Popul Biol; 2016 Feb; 107():4-13. PubMed ID: 26344786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inference of kinship using spatial distributions of SNPs for genome-wide association studies.
    Lee H; Chen L
    BMC Genomics; 2016 May; 17():372. PubMed ID: 27206321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of marker-based estimators of inbreeding and inbreeding depression.
    Caballero A; Fernández A; Villanueva B; Toro MA
    Genet Sel Evol; 2022 Dec; 54(1):82. PubMed ID: 36575379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Determining the genome-wide kinship coefficient seems unhelpful in distinguishing consanguineous couples with a high versus low risk for adverse reproductive outcome.
    Kelmemi W; Teeuw ME; Bochdanovits Z; Ouburg S; Jonker MA; Alkuraya F; Hashem M; Kayserili H; van Haeringen A; Sheridan E; Masri A; Cobben JM; Rizzu P; Kostense PJ; Dommering CJ; Henneman L; Bouhamed-Chaabouni H; Heutink P; Ten Kate LP; Cornel MC
    BMC Med Genet; 2015 Jul; 16():50. PubMed ID: 26188928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. IBDkin: fast estimation of kinship coefficients from identity by descent segments.
    Zhou Y; Browning SR; Browning BL
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Aug; 36(16):4519-4520. PubMed ID: 32844204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.