135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38365074)
21. Sediment-porewater partitioning, total sulfur, and methylmercury production in estuaries.
Schartup AT; Balcom PH; Mason RP
Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Jan; 48(2):954-60. PubMed ID: 24344684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Arsenate decreases production of methylmercury across increasing sulfate concentration amendments in freshwater lake sediments.
Mija A; Jules M B; Alexandre J P
Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2022 Sep; 24(9):1508-1516. PubMed ID: 35671194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Mercury net methylation in five tropical flood plain regions of Brazil: high in the root zone of floating macrophyte mats but low in surface sediments and flooded soils.
Guimarães JR; Meili M; Hylander LD; de Castro e Silva E; Roulet M; Mauro JB; de Lemos R
Sci Total Environ; 2000 Oct; 261(1-3):99-107. PubMed ID: 11036981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Biotically mediated mercury methylation in the soils and sediments of Nam Co Lake, Tibetan Plateau.
Ma M; Du H; Wang D; Kang S; Sun T
Environ Pollut; 2017 Aug; 227():243-251. PubMed ID: 28475977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Mercury alkylation in freshwater sediments from Scottish canals.
Cavoura O; Brombach CC; Cortis R; Davidson CM; Gajdosechova Z; Keenan HE; Krupp EM
Chemosphere; 2017 Sep; 183():27-35. PubMed ID: 28531556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Methanogens and Iron-Reducing Bacteria: the Overlooked Members of Mercury-Methylating Microbial Communities in Boreal Lakes.
Bravo AG; Peura S; Buck M; Ahmed O; Mateos-Rivera A; Herrero Ortega S; Schaefer JK; Bouchet S; Tolu J; Björn E; Bertilsson S
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Dec; 84(23):. PubMed ID: 30242005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Activated carbon mitigates mercury and methylmercury bioavailability in contaminated sediments.
Gilmour CC; Riedel GS; Riedel G; Kwon S; Landis R; Brown SS; Menzie CA; Ghosh U
Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Nov; 47(22):13001-10. PubMed ID: 24156748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Redox gradient shapes the abundance and diversity of mercury-methylating microorganisms along the water column of the Black Sea.
Cabrol L; Capo E; van Vliet DM; von Meijenfeldt FAB; Bertilsson S; Villanueva L; Sánchez-Andrea I; Björn E; G Bravo A; Heimburger Boavida LE
mSystems; 2023 Aug; 8(4):e0053723. PubMed ID: 37578240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A review on mercury biogeochemistry in mangrove sediments: Hotspots of methylmercury production?
Lei P; Zhong H; Duan D; Pan K
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Aug; 680():140-150. PubMed ID: 31112813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effects and mechanisms of organic matter regulating the methylmercury dynamics in mangrove sediments.
Liu J; Li Y; Duan D; Peng G; Li P; Lei P; Zhong H; Tsui MT; Pan K
J Hazard Mater; 2022 Jun; 432():128690. PubMed ID: 35325865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Net methylation of mercury in estuarine sediment microcosms amended with dissolved, nanoparticulate, and microparticulate mercuric sulfides.
Zhang T; Kucharzyk KH; Kim B; Deshusses MA; Hsu-Kim H
Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Aug; 48(16):9133-41. PubMed ID: 25007388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Sulfate-reducing bacteria methylate mercury at variable rates in pure culture and in marine sediments.
King JK; Kostka JE; Frischer ME; Saunders FM
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2000 Jun; 66(6):2430-7. PubMed ID: 10831421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Geochemical controls on the distribution of total mercury and methylmercury in sediments and porewater from the Yangtze River Estuary to the East China Sea.
Cao F; Yang S; Yin D; Wang R
Sci Total Environ; 2023 Sep; 892():164737. PubMed ID: 37301398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Mercury methylation and methylmercury demethylation in boreal lake sediment with legacy sulphate pollution.
Huang H; Mangal V; Rennie MD; Tong H; Simpson MJ; Mitchell CPJ
Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2022 Jun; 24(6):932-944. PubMed ID: 35532885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evidence of methylmercury production and modification of the microbial community structure in estuary sediments contaminated with wastewater treatment plant effluents.
Ramond JB; Petit F; Quillet L; Ouddane B; Berthe T
Mar Pollut Bull; 2011 May; 62(5):1073-80. PubMed ID: 21429530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effects of coastal managed retreat on mercury biogeochemistry.
Sizmur T; Godfrey A; O'Driscoll NJ
Environ Pollut; 2016 Feb; 209():99-106. PubMed ID: 26647172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Role of sulfur biogeochemical cycle in mercury methylation in estuarine sediments: A review.
Wang J; Dai J; Chen G; Jiang F
J Hazard Mater; 2022 Feb; 423(Pt A):126964. PubMed ID: 34523493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Contribution of coexisting sulfate and iron reducing bacteria to methylmercury production in freshwater river sediments.
Yu RQ; Flanders JR; Mack EE; Turner R; Mirza MB; Barkay T
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Mar; 46(5):2684-91. PubMed ID: 22148328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Mercury speciation in sediments at a municipal sewage sludge marine disposal site.
Shoham-Frider E; Shelef G; Kress N
Mar Environ Res; 2007 Dec; 64(5):601-15. PubMed ID: 17692909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Importance of organic matter lability for monomethylmercury production in sulfate-rich marine sediments.
Kim M; Han S; Gieskes J; Deheyn DD
Sci Total Environ; 2011 Jan; 409(4):778-84. PubMed ID: 21109287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
