These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38366085)

  • 1. Choice of DNA extraction method affects stool microbiome recovery and subsequent phenotypic association analyses.
    Fernández-Pato A; Sinha T; Gacesa R; Andreu-Sánchez S; Gois MFB; Gelderloos-Arends J; Jansen DBH; Kruk M; Jaeger M; Joosten LAB; Netea MG; Weersma RK; Wijmenga C; Harmsen HJM; Fu J; Zhernakova A; Kurilshikov A
    Sci Rep; 2024 Feb; 14(1):3911. PubMed ID: 38366085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. High-throughput DNA extraction strategy for fecal microbiome studies.
    Isokääntä H; Tomnikov N; Vanhatalo S; Munukka E; Huovinen P; Hakanen AJ; Kallonen T
    Microbiol Spectr; 2024 Jun; 12(6):e0293223. PubMed ID: 38747618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of fecal DNA extraction protocols for human gut microbiome studies.
    Lim MY; Park YS; Kim JH; Nam YD
    BMC Microbiol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):212. PubMed ID: 32680572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of DNA extraction methods for human gut microbial community profiling.
    Lim MY; Song EJ; Kim SH; Lee J; Nam YD
    Syst Appl Microbiol; 2018 Mar; 41(2):151-157. PubMed ID: 29305057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative analysis of commercially available kits for optimal DNA extraction from bovine fecal samples.
    Seethalakshmi PS; Kumaresan TN; Vishnu Prasad Nair RU; Prathiviraj R; Seghal Kiran G; Selvin J
    Arch Microbiol; 2024 Jun; 206(7):314. PubMed ID: 38900289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of fecal DNA extraction protocols for metagenomic studies.
    Yang F; Sun J; Luo H; Ren H; Zhou H; Lin Y; Han M; Chen B; Liao H; Brix S; Li J; Yang H; Kristiansen K; Zhong H
    Gigascience; 2020 Jul; 9(7):. PubMed ID: 32657325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of DNA extraction, sample dilution, and reagent contamination on 16S rRNA gene sequencing of human feces.
    Velásquez-Mejía EP; de la Cuesta-Zuluaga J; Escobar JS
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2018 Jan; 102(1):403-411. PubMed ID: 29079861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Host DNA depletion efficiency of microbiome DNA enrichment methods in infected tissue samples.
    Heravi FS; Zakrzewski M; Vickery K; Hu H
    J Microbiol Methods; 2020 Mar; 170():105856. PubMed ID: 32007505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differences in the gut microbiome composition of Korean children and adult samples based on different DNA isolation kits.
    Baek C; Kim WJ; Moon J; Moon SY; Kim W; Hu HJ; Min J
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(3):e0264291. PubMed ID: 35271591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Methods To Collect Fecal Samples for Microbiome Studies Using Whole-Genome Shotgun Metagenomic Sequencing.
    Byrd DA; Sinha R; Hoffman KL; Chen J; Hua X; Shi J; Chia N; Petrosino J; Vogtmann E
    mSphere; 2020 Feb; 5(1):. PubMed ID: 32250964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of Host Depletion and Extraction Methods for Shotgun Metagenomic Analysis of Bovine Vaginal Samples.
    Ong CT; Boe-Hansen G; Ross EM; Blackall PJ; Turni C; Hayes BJ; Tabor AE
    Microbiol Spectr; 2022 Apr; 10(2):e0041221. PubMed ID: 35404108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Fecal Collection Methods on Variation in Gut Metagenomics and Untargeted Metabolomics.
    Guan H; Pu Y; Liu C; Lou T; Tan S; Kong M; Sun Z; Mei Z; Qi Q; Quan Z; Zhao G; Zheng Y
    mSphere; 2021 Oct; 6(5):e0063621. PubMed ID: 34523982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of DNA extraction methods for 16S rRNA gene sequencing in the analysis of the human gut microbiome.
    Elie C; Perret M; Hage H; Sentausa E; Hesketh A; Louis K; Fritah-Lafont A; Leissner P; Vachon C; Rostaing H; Reynier F; Gervasi G; Saliou A
    Sci Rep; 2023 Jun; 13(1):10279. PubMed ID: 37355726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimisation of 16S rRNA gut microbiota profiling of extremely low birth weight infants.
    Alcon-Giner C; Caim S; Mitra S; Ketskemety J; Wegmann U; Wain J; Belteki G; Clarke P; Hall LJ
    BMC Genomics; 2017 Nov; 18(1):841. PubMed ID: 29096601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A metagenomic study of the gut microbiome in Behcet's disease.
    Ye Z; Zhang N; Wu C; Zhang X; Wang Q; Huang X; Du L; Cao Q; Tang J; Zhou C; Hou S; He Y; Xu Q; Xiong X; Kijlstra A; Qin N; Yang P
    Microbiome; 2018 Aug; 6(1):135. PubMed ID: 30077182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biases from different DNA extraction methods in intestine microbiome research based on 16S rDNA sequencing: a case in the koi carp, Cyprinus carpio var. Koi.
    Han Z; Sun J; Lv A; Wang A
    Microbiologyopen; 2019 Jan; 8(1):e00626. PubMed ID: 29667371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characterization and Demonstration of Mock Communities as Control Reagents for Accurate Human Microbiome Community Measurements.
    Tourlousse DM; Narita K; Miura T; Ohashi A; Matsuda M; Ohyama Y; Shimamura M; Furukawa M; Kasahara K; Kameyama K; Saito S; Goto M; Shimizu R; Mishima R; Nakayama J; Hosomi K; Kunisawa J; Terauchi J; Sekiguchi Y; Kawasaki H
    Microbiol Spectr; 2022 Apr; 10(2):e0191521. PubMed ID: 35234490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An Improved Methodology to Overcome Key Issues in Human Fecal Metagenomic DNA Extraction.
    Kumar J; Kumar M; Gupta S; Ahmed V; Bhambi M; Pandey R; Chauhan NS
    Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics; 2016 Dec; 14(6):371-378. PubMed ID: 27888152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improved yield and accuracy for DNA extraction in microbiome studies with variation in microbial biomass.
    Davis A; Kohler C; Alsallaq R; Hayden R; Maron G; Margolis E
    Biotechniques; 2019 Jun; 66(6):285-289. PubMed ID: 31124702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reliability of a participant-friendly fecal collection method for microbiome analyses: a step towards large sample size investigation.
    Szopinska JW; Gresse R; van der Marel S; Boekhorst J; Lukovac S; van Swam I; Franke B; Timmerman H; Belzer C; Arias Vasquez A
    BMC Microbiol; 2018 Sep; 18(1):110. PubMed ID: 30189859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.