149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38366240)
1. A comparative analysis of the clinical pregnancy and perinatal outcomes between oocyte vitrification and embryo vitrification based on the propensity score matching method.
Du S; Shen C; Zhang J
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2024 Apr; 41(4):875-883. PubMed ID: 38366240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Definition of a clinical strategy to enhance the efficacy, efficiency and safety of egg donation cycles with imported vitrified oocytes.
Rienzi L; Cimadomo D; Maggiulli R; Vaiarelli A; Dusi L; Buffo L; Amendola MG; Colamaria S; Giuliani M; Bruno G; Stoppa M; Ubaldi FM
Hum Reprod; 2020 Apr; 35(4):785-795. PubMed ID: 32240287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Efficiency and efficacy of vitrification in 35 654 sibling oocytes from donation cycles.
Cornet-Bartolomé D; Rodriguez A; García D; Barragán M; Vassena R
Hum Reprod; 2020 Oct; 35(10):2262-2271. PubMed ID: 32856058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Perinatal outcomes of singletons following vitrification versus slow-freezing of embryos: a multicenter cohort study using propensity score analysis.
Gu F; Li S; Zheng L; Gu J; Li T; Du H; Gao C; Ding C; Quan S; Zhou C; Li P; Xu Y
Hum Reprod; 2019 Sep; 34(9):1788-1798. PubMed ID: 31407797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Neonatal health including congenital malformation risk of 1072 children born after vitrified embryo transfer.
Belva F; Bonduelle M; Roelants M; Verheyen G; Van Landuyt L
Hum Reprod; 2016 Jul; 31(7):1610-20. PubMed ID: 27165622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical outcomes following cryopreservation of blastocysts by vitrification or slow freezing: a population-based cohort study.
Li Z; Wang YA; Ledger W; Edgar DH; Sullivan EA
Hum Reprod; 2014 Dec; 29(12):2794-801. PubMed ID: 25316444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Embryos from vitrified vs. fresh oocytes in an oocyte donation program: a comparative morphokinetic analysis.
Karagianni M; Papadopoulou MI; Oraiopoulou C; Christoforidis N; Papatheodorou A; Chatziparasidou A
F S Sci; 2024 May; 5(2):174-181. PubMed ID: 38580180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Perinatal and maternal outcome after vitrification of blastocysts: a Nordic study in singletons from the CoNARTaS group.
Ginström Ernstad E; Spangmose AL; Opdahl S; Henningsen AA; Romundstad LB; Tiitinen A; Gissler M; Wennerholm UB; Pinborg A; Bergh C; Malchau SS
Hum Reprod; 2019 Nov; 34(11):2282-2289. PubMed ID: 31687765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes after transfer of vitrified early cleavage embryos.
Liu SY; Teng B; Fu J; Li X; Zheng Y; Sun XX
Hum Reprod; 2013 Aug; 28(8):2093-100. PubMed ID: 23569081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance.
Rienzi L; Gracia C; Maggiulli R; LaBarbera AR; Kaser DJ; Ubaldi FM; Vanderpoel S; Racowsky C
Hum Reprod Update; 2017 Mar; 23(2):139-155. PubMed ID: 27827818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effective protection: the embryonic development and clinical outcomes of emergency vitrification of 1246 oocytes and Day 0-Day 5 embryos in a natural disaster.
Song W; Zhang F; Wang Y; Shi H; Sun N; Jin H; Wang X; Guo Y; Hu L; Zhai J; Dai S; Zhang Y; Su Y; Yao G; Shi S; Wen S; Song N; Wu Z; Chen L; Cheng T; Kang B; Sun J; Huang X; Sun Z; Cheng L; Liang Y; Sun Y
Hum Reprod; 2023 Dec; 38(12):2412-2421. PubMed ID: 37846525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A prospective pilot study comparing fertilization and embryo development between fresh and vitrified sibling oocytes.
Siano L; Engmann L; Nulsen J; Benadiva C
Conn Med; 2013 Apr; 77(4):211-7. PubMed ID: 23691734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How does vitrification affect oocyte viability in oocyte donation cycles? A prospective study to compare outcomes achieved with fresh versus vitrified sibling oocytes.
Solé M; Santaló J; Boada M; Clua E; Rodríguez I; Martínez F; Coroleu B; Barri PN; Veiga A
Hum Reprod; 2013 Aug; 28(8):2087-92. PubMed ID: 23744895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical outcomes of a vitrified donor oocyte programme: A single UK centre experience.
Seshadri S; Saab W; Exeter H; Drew E; Petrie A; Davies M; Serhal P
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Jun; 225():136-140. PubMed ID: 29709727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Live birth rate following a euploid blastocyst transfer is not affected by double vitrification and warming at cleavage or blastocyst stage.
Theodorou E; Jones BP; Cardenas Armas DF; Heath C; Serhal P; Ben-Nagi J
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2022 Apr; 39(4):987-993. PubMed ID: 35217947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cumulative pregnancy rates of two strategies: Day 3 fresh embryo transfer followed by Day 3 or Day 5/6 vitrification and embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial.
Mengels A; Van Muylder A; Peeraer K; Luyten J; Laenen A; Spiessens C; Debrock S
Hum Reprod; 2024 Jan; 39(1):62-73. PubMed ID: 37886820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact of embryo vitrification on placental histopathology features and perinatal outcome in singleton live births.
Volodarsky-Perel A; Ton Nu TN; Orvieto R; Mashiach R; Machado-Gedeon A; Cui Y; Shaul J; Dahan MH
Hum Reprod; 2022 Sep; 37(10):2482-2491. PubMed ID: 35906920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Birthweight of singletons born after cleavage-stage or blastocyst transfer in fresh and warming cycles.
De Vos A; Santos-Ribeiro S; Van Landuyt L; Van de Velde H; Tournaye H; Verheyen G
Hum Reprod; 2018 Feb; 33(2):196-201. PubMed ID: 29206936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perinatal outcomes in children born after fresh or frozen embryo transfer using donated oocytes.
Rafael F; Robles GM; Navarro AT; Garrido N; Garcia-Velasco JA; Bosch E; Nunes SG; Soares SR; Santos-Ribeiro S
Hum Reprod; 2022 Jun; 37(7):1642-1651. PubMed ID: 35451027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Closed oocyte vitrification and storage in an oocyte donation programme: obstetric and neonatal outcome.
De Munck N; Belva F; Van de Velde H; Verheyen G; Stoop D
Hum Reprod; 2016 May; 31(5):1024-33. PubMed ID: 26936884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
