These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38366786)

  • 1. Enrichment of hard sweeps on the X chromosome compared to autosomes in six Drosophila species.
    Harris M; Kim BY; Garud N
    Genetics; 2024 Apr; 226(4):. PubMed ID: 38366786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Enrichment of hard sweeps on the X chromosome compared to autosomes in six Drosophila species.
    Harris M; Kim B; Garud N
    bioRxiv; 2023 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 38106201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Enrichment of Hard Sweeps on the X Chromosome in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Harris M; Garud NR
    Mol Biol Evol; 2023 Jan; 40(1):. PubMed ID: 36546413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The relation between recombination rate and patterns of molecular evolution and variation in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Campos JL; Halligan DL; Haddrill PR; Charlesworth B
    Mol Biol Evol; 2014 Apr; 31(4):1010-28. PubMed ID: 24489114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recent selective sweeps in North American Drosophila melanogaster show signatures of soft sweeps.
    Garud NR; Messer PW; Buzbas EO; Petrov DA
    PLoS Genet; 2015 Feb; 11(2):e1005004. PubMed ID: 25706129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Elevated Linkage Disequilibrium and Signatures of Soft Sweeps Are Common in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Garud NR; Petrov DA
    Genetics; 2016 Jun; 203(2):863-80. PubMed ID: 27098909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detection of hard and soft selective sweeps from Drosophila melanogaster population genomic data.
    Garud NR; Messer PW; Petrov DA
    PLoS Genet; 2021 Feb; 17(2):e1009373. PubMed ID: 33635910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genome diversity and divergence in Drosophila mauritiana: multiple signatures of faster X evolution.
    Garrigan D; Kingan SB; Geneva AJ; Vedanayagam JP; Presgraves DC
    Genome Biol Evol; 2014 Sep; 6(9):2444-58. PubMed ID: 25193308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of background selection in shaping patterns of molecular evolution and variation: evidence from variability on the Drosophila X chromosome.
    Charlesworth B
    Genetics; 2012 May; 191(1):233-46. PubMed ID: 22377629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Extreme selective sweeps independently targeted the X chromosomes of the great apes.
    Nam K; Munch K; Hobolth A; Dutheil JY; Veeramah KR; Woerner AE; Hammer MF; ; Mailund T; Schierup MH
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 May; 112(20):6413-8. PubMed ID: 25941379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Codon usage bias and effective population sizes on the X chromosome versus the autosomes in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Campos JL; Zeng K; Parker DJ; Charlesworth B; Haddrill PR
    Mol Biol Evol; 2013 Apr; 30(4):811-23. PubMed ID: 23204387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contrasting the efficacy of selection on the X and autosomes in Drosophila.
    Singh ND; Larracuente AM; Clark AG
    Mol Biol Evol; 2008 Feb; 25(2):454-67. PubMed ID: 18083702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of GC-biased gene conversion on non-adaptive sequence evolution in short introns of Drosophila melanogaster.
    Yıldırım B; Vogl C
    J Evol Biol; 2024 Apr; 37(4):383-400. PubMed ID: 38367009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Soft shoulders ahead: spurious signatures of soft and partial selective sweeps result from linked hard sweeps.
    Schrider DR; Mendes FK; Hahn MW; Kern AD
    Genetics; 2015 May; 200(1):267-84. PubMed ID: 25716978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Gene content evolution on the X chromosome.
    Gurbich TA; Bachtrog D
    Curr Opin Genet Dev; 2008 Dec; 18(6):493-8. PubMed ID: 18929654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contrasting Patterns of Genomic Diversity Reveal Accelerated Genetic Drift but Reduced Directional Selection on X-Chromosome in Wild and Domestic Sheep Species.
    Chen ZH; Zhang M; Lv FH; Ren X; Li WR; Liu MJ; Nam K; Bruford MW; Li MH
    Genome Biol Evol; 2018 Apr; 10(5):1282-1297. PubMed ID: 29790980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Background selection as baseline for nucleotide variation across the Drosophila genome.
    Comeron JM
    PLoS Genet; 2014 Jun; 10(6):e1004434. PubMed ID: 24968283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How Good Are Predictions of the Effects of Selective Sweeps on Levels of Neutral Diversity?
    Charlesworth B
    Genetics; 2020 Dec; 216(4):1217-1238. PubMed ID: 33106248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Chromosomal patterns of microsatellite variability contrast sharply in African and non-African populations of Drosophila melanogaster.
    Kauer M; Zangerl B; Dieringer D; Schlötterer C
    Genetics; 2002 Jan; 160(1):247-56. PubMed ID: 11805060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Testing models of selection and demography in Drosophila simulans.
    Wall JD; Andolfatto P; Przeworski M
    Genetics; 2002 Sep; 162(1):203-16. PubMed ID: 12242234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.