BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38366900)

  • 1. Randomized controlled trial of nasogastric tube use after esophagectomy: study protocol for the kinetic trial.
    Hedberg J; Sundbom M; Edholm D; Aahlin EK; Szabo E; Lindberg F; Johnsen G; Førland DT; Johansson J; Kauppila JH; Svendsen LB; Nilsson M; Lindblad M; Lagergren P; Larsen MH; Åkesson O; Löfdahl P; Mala T; Achiam MP
    Dis Esophagus; 2024 Jun; 37(6):. PubMed ID: 38366900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nasogastric decompression following esophagectomy: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
    Weijs TJ; Kumagai K; Berkelmans GH; Nieuwenhuijzen GA; Nilsson M; Luyer MD
    Dis Esophagus; 2017 Feb; 30(3):1-8. PubMed ID: 27627872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of the Effect of Early Versus Conventional Nasogastric Tube Removal on Postoperative Complications After Transthoracic Esophagectomy: A Single-Center, Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Hayashi M; Kawakubo H; Shoji Y; Mayanagi S; Nakamura R; Suda K; Wada N; Takeuchi H; Kitagawa Y
    World J Surg; 2019 Feb; 43(2):580-589. PubMed ID: 30353406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of short-term vs prolonged nasogastric decompression on major postesophagectomy complications: a parallel-group, randomized trial.
    Mistry RC; Vijayabhaskar R; Karimundackal G; Jiwnani S; Pramesh CS
    Arch Surg; 2012 Aug; 147(8):747-51. PubMed ID: 22911072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Non-placement versus placement of a drainage tube around the cervical anastomosis in McKeown esophagectomy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Oshikiri T; Takiguchi G; Miura S; Takase N; Hasegawa H; Yamamoto M; Kanaji S; Yamashita K; Matsuda Y; Matsuda T; Nakamura T; Suzuki S; Kakeji Y
    Trials; 2019 Dec; 20(1):758. PubMed ID: 31870427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The ISCON-trial protocol: laparoscopic ischemic conditioning prior to esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer and arterial calcifications.
    Veen AV; Schiffmann LM; de Groot EM; Bartella I; de Jong PA; Borggreve AS; Brosens LAA; Santos DPD; Fuchs H; Ruurda JP; Bruns CJ; van Hillegersberg R; Schröder W
    BMC Cancer; 2022 Feb; 22(1):144. PubMed ID: 35123419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Triangulating stapling vs functional end-to-end stapling for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Tsuji T; Ojima T; Nakamori M; Nakamura M; Katsuda M; Hayata K; Kitadani J; Maruoka S; Shimokawa T; Yamaue H
    Trials; 2019 Jan; 20(1):83. PubMed ID: 30691515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Treatment of intrathoracic anastomotic leak after esophagectomy with the sump drainage tube.
    Yin Q; Zhou S; Song Y; Xun X; Liu N; Liu L
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2021 Mar; 16(1):46. PubMed ID: 33757562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Minimally Invasive Versus open AbdominoThoracic Esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma (MIVATE) - study protocol for a randomized controlled trial DRKS00016773.
    Nickel F; Probst P; Studier-Fischer A; Nienhüser H; Pauly J; Kowalewski KF; Weiterer S; Knebel P; Diener MK; Weigand MA; Büchler MW; Schmidt T; Müller-Stich BP
    Trials; 2021 Jan; 22(1):41. PubMed ID: 33430937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Direct Oral Feeding Following Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (NUTRIENT II trial): An International, Multicenter, Open-label Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Berkelmans GHK; Fransen LFC; Dolmans-Zwartjes ACP; Kouwenhoven EA; van Det MJ; Nilsson M; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Luyer MDP
    Ann Surg; 2020 Jan; 271(1):41-47. PubMed ID: 31090563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A successful clinical pathway protocol for minimally invasive esophagectomy.
    Merritt RE; Kneuertz PJ; D'Souza DM; Perry KA
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Apr; 34(4):1696-1703. PubMed ID: 31286257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nasogastric tube utilization after esophagectomy: an unnecessary gesture?
    Menéndez-Jiménez M; Bruna-Esteban M; Mingol F; Vaqué J; Hervás D; Álvarez-Sarrado E; Navasquillo-Tamarit M; Hurtado-Pardo L; García-Granero E
    Cir Esp (Engl Ed); 2020 Dec; 98(10):598-604. PubMed ID: 32505557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intrathoracic vs Cervical Anastomosis After Totally or Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    van Workum F; Verstegen MHP; Klarenbeek BR; Bouwense SAW; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Daams F; Gisbertz SS; Hannink G; Haveman JW; Heisterkamp J; Jansen W; Kouwenhoven EA; van Lanschot JJB; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; van der Peet DL; Polat F; Ubels S; Wijnhoven BPL; Rovers MM; Rosman C;
    JAMA Surg; 2021 Jul; 156(7):601-610. PubMed ID: 33978698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nasogastric placement of sump tube through the leak for the treatment of esophagogastric anastomotic leak after esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma.
    Jiang F; Yu MF; Ren BH; Yin GW; Zhang Q; Xu L
    J Surg Res; 2011 Dec; 171(2):448-51. PubMed ID: 20828722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A pilot randomized controlled trial on the utility of gastric conditioning in the prevention of esophagogastric anastomotic leak after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. The APIL_2013 Trial.
    Mils K; Miró M; Farran L; Videla S; Alba E; Estremiana F; Bettonica C; Aranda H
    Int J Surg; 2022 Oct; 106():106921. PubMed ID: 36116675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. End-to-end versus end-to-side esophagogastrostomy after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective randomized study.
    Nederlof N; Tilanus HW; Tran TC; Hop WC; Wijnhoven BP; de Jonge J
    Ann Surg; 2011 Aug; 254(2):226-33. PubMed ID: 21725230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transcervical gastric tube drainage facilitates patient mobility and reduces the risk of pulmonary complications after esophagectomy.
    Schuchert MJ; Pettiford BL; Landreneau JP; Waxman J; Kilic A; Santos RS; Kent MS; El-Sherif A; Abbas G; Luketich JD; Landreneau RJ
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2008 Sep; 12(9):1479-84. PubMed ID: 18560944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The CARDIA-trial protocol: a multinational, prospective, randomized, clinical trial comparing transthoracic esophagectomy with transhiatal extended gastrectomy in adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) type II.
    Leers JM; Knepper L; van der Veen A; Schröder W; Fuchs H; Schiller P; Hellmich M; Zettelmeyer U; Brosens LAA; Quaas A; Ruurda JP; van Hillegersberg R; Bruns CJ
    BMC Cancer; 2020 Aug; 20(1):781. PubMed ID: 32819399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Utility of Thermography of Reconstructed Gastric Conduit for Predicting Postoperative Anastomotic Leakage After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.
    Sohda M; Miyazaki T; Watanabe T; Nakazawa N; Ubukata Y; Kuriyama K; Hara K; Sakai M; Sano A; Yokobori T; Ogawa H; Shirabe K; Saeki H
    Anticancer Res; 2021 Jan; 41(1):453-458. PubMed ID: 33419843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Early and long-term morbidity after minimally invasive total laryngo-pharyngo-esophagectomy with gastric pull-up reconstruction via thoracoscopy, laparoscopy and cervical incision.
    Homma A; Nakamaru Y; Hatakeyama H; Mizumachi T; Kano S; Furusawa J; Sakashita T; Shichinohe T; Ebihara Y; Hirano S; Furukawa H; Hayashi T; Yamamoto Y; Fukuda S
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Nov; 272(11):3551-6. PubMed ID: 25476198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.