153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38366933)
1. Development, characterization, and evaluation of a simple polymicrobial colony biofilm model for testing of antimicrobial wound dressings.
Robertson SN; Romero M; Fenn S; Kohler Riedi PL; Cámara M
J Appl Microbiol; 2024 Mar; 135(3):. PubMed ID: 38366933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of internally validated
Suleman L; Purcell L; Thomas H; Westgate S
J Wound Care; 2020 Mar; 29(3):154-161. PubMed ID: 32160088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro prevention and inactivation of biofilms using controlled-release iodine foam dressings for wound healing.
Watson F; Chen R; Percival SL
Int Wound J; 2024 Jan; 21(1):e14365. PubMed ID: 37715349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Controlled-release iodine foam dressings demonstrate broad-spectrum biofilm management in several in vitro models.
Salisbury AM; Mullin M; Foulkes L; Chen R; Percival SL
Int Wound J; 2022 Nov; 19(7):1717-1728. PubMed ID: 35166016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical and in vitro performance of an antibiofilm Hydrofiber wound dressing.
Scully R; Hurlow J; Walker M; Metcalf D; Parsons D; Bowler P
J Wound Care; 2018 Sep; 27(9):584-592. PubMed ID: 30204577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cadexomer iodine provides superior efficacy against bacterial wound biofilms in vitro and in vivo.
Fitzgerald DJ; Renick PJ; Forrest EC; Tetens SP; Earnest DN; McMillan J; Kiedaisch BM; Shi L; Roche ED
Wound Repair Regen; 2017 Jan; 25(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 27859922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ag5IO6: novel antibiofilm activity of a silver compound with application to medical devices.
Incani V; Omar A; Prosperi-Porta G; Nadworny P
Int J Antimicrob Agents; 2015 Jun; 45(6):586-93. PubMed ID: 25604278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Antimicrobial activity of silver-containing dressings on wound microorganisms using an in vitro biofilm model.
Percival SL; Bowler PG; Dolman J
Int Wound J; 2007 Jun; 4(2):186-91. PubMed ID: 17651233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A multimodel regime for evaluating effectiveness of antimicrobial wound care products in microbial biofilms.
Stoffel JJ; Kohler Riedi PL; Hadj Romdhane B
Wound Repair Regen; 2020 Jul; 28(4):438-447. PubMed ID: 32175636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An in vitro model of chronic wound biofilms to test wound dressings and assess antimicrobial susceptibilities.
Hill KE; Malic S; McKee R; Rennison T; Harding KG; Williams DW; Thomas DW
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2010 Jun; 65(6):1195-206. PubMed ID: 20378671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Testing wound dressings using an in vitro wound model.
Lipp C; Kirker K; Agostinho A; James G; Stewart P
J Wound Care; 2010 Jun; 19(6):220-6. PubMed ID: 20551862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vitro comparison of antimicrobial activity of iodine and silver dressings against biofilms.
Thorn RM; Austin AJ; Greenman J; Wilkins JP; Davis PJ
J Wound Care; 2009 Aug; 18(8):343-6. PubMed ID: 19862874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Antimicrobial dressing efficacy against mature Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm on porcine skin explants.
Phillips PL; Yang Q; Davis S; Sampson EM; Azeke JI; Hamad A; Schultz GS
Int Wound J; 2015 Aug; 12(4):469-83. PubMed ID: 24028432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of a novel, antimicrobial dressing on in vivo, Pseudomonas aeruginosa wound biofilm: quantitative comparative analysis using a rabbit ear model.
Seth AK; Zhong A; Nguyen KT; Hong SJ; Leung KP; Galiano RD; Mustoe TA
Wound Repair Regen; 2014; 22(6):712-9. PubMed ID: 25230854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Antibiofilm activity of chitosan/epsilon-poly-L-lysine hydrogels in a porcine ex vivo skin wound polymicrobial biofilm model.
Pati BA; Kurata WE; Horseman TS; Pierce LM
Wound Repair Regen; 2021 Mar; 29(2):316-326. PubMed ID: 33480137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A novel chronic wound biofilm model sustaining coexistence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus suitable for testing of antibiofilm effect of antimicrobial solutions and wound dressings.
Chen X; Lorenzen J; Xu Y; Jonikaite M; Thaarup IC; Bjarnsholt T; Kirketerp-Møller K; Thomsen TR
Wound Repair Regen; 2021 Sep; 29(5):820-829. PubMed ID: 34105845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of flow cytometry to compare the antimicrobial efficacy of silver-containing wound dressings against planktonic Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Percival SL; Slone W; Linton S; Okel T; Corum L; Thomas JG
Wound Repair Regen; 2011; 19(3):436-41. PubMed ID: 21518089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Anti-biofilm efficacy of a lactoferrin/xylitol wound hydrogel used in combination with silver wound dressings.
Ammons MC; Ward LS; James GA
Int Wound J; 2011 Jun; 8(3):268-73. PubMed ID: 21457463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Testing the efficacy of topical antimicrobial treatments using a two- and five-species chronic wound biofilm model.
Nedelea AG; Plant RL; Robins LI; Maddocks SE
J Appl Microbiol; 2022 Jan; 132(1):715-724. PubMed ID: 34319637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing the effect of an antimicrobial wound dressing on biofilms.
Percival SL; Bowler P; Woods EJ
Wound Repair Regen; 2008; 16(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 18211579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
