176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38368409)
1. Recurrences of advanced sessile and lateral spreading colorectal adenoma after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) thermal ablation versus no adjuvant therapy (RESPECT): a protocol of an international randomized controlled trial.
Kemper G; Gerges C; Schoon EJ; Schreuder RM; Schrauwen RRW; Epping LSM; Beyna T; Drenth JPH; Gündug U; Siersema PD; van Geenen EJM;
Trials; 2024 Feb; 25(1):132. PubMed ID: 38368409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Snare Tip Soft Coagulation vs Argon Plasma Coagulation vs No Margin Treatment After Large Nonpedunculated Colorectal Polyp Resection: a Randomized Trial.
Rex DK; Haber GB; Khashab M; Rastogi A; Hasan MK; DiMaio CJ; Kumta NA; Nagula S; Gordon S; Al-Kawas F; Waye JD; Razjouyan H; Dye CE; Moyer MT; Shultz J; Lahr RE; Yuen PYS; Dixon R; Boyd L; Pohl H
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2024 Mar; 22(3):552-561.e4. PubMed ID: 37871841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Thermal Ablation of Mucosal Defect Margins Reduces Adenoma Recurrence After Colonic Endoscopic Mucosal Resection.
Klein A; Tate DJ; Jayasekeran V; Hourigan L; Singh R; Brown G; Bahin FF; Burgess N; Williams SJ; Lee E; Sidhu M; Byth K; Bourke MJ
Gastroenterology; 2019 Feb; 156(3):604-613.e3. PubMed ID: 30296436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) versus endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for resection of large distal non-pedunculated colorectal adenomas (MATILDA-trial): rationale and design of a multicenter randomized clinical trial.
Backes Y; Moons LM; van Bergeijk JD; Berk L; Ter Borg F; Ter Borg PC; Elias SG; Geesing JM; Groen JN; Hadithi M; Hardwick JC; Kerkhof M; Mangen MJ; Straathof JW; Schröder R; Schwartz MP; Spanier BW; de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel WH; Wolfhagen FH; Koch AD
BMC Gastroenterol; 2016 May; 16(1):56. PubMed ID: 27229709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Endoscopic mucosal resection for large serrated lesions in comparison with adenomas: a prospective multicentre study of 2000 lesions.
Pellise M; Burgess NG; Tutticci N; Hourigan LF; Zanati SA; Brown GJ; Singh R; Williams SJ; Raftopoulos SC; Ormonde D; Moss A; Byth K; P'Ng H; Mahajan H; McLeod D; Bourke MJ
Gut; 2017 Apr; 66(4):644-653. PubMed ID: 26786685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prophylactic Snare Tip Soft Coagulation and Its Impact on Adenoma Recurrence After Colonic Endoscopic Mucosal Resection.
Kandel P; Werlang ME; Ahn IR; Woodward TA; Raimondo M; Bouras EP; Wallace MB; Gómez V
Dig Dis Sci; 2019 Nov; 64(11):3300-3306. PubMed ID: 31098871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Local recurrence rates after resection of large colorectal serrated lesions with or without margin thermal ablation.
Djinbachian R; Amar L; Pohl H; Safih W; Bouchard S; Deslandres E; Dorais J; von Renteln D
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2024; 59(1):112-117. PubMed ID: 37743643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clip placement to prevent delayed bleeding after colonic endoscopic mucosal resection (CLIPPER): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Turan AS; Moons LMG; Schreuder RM; Schoon EJ; Terhaar Sive Droste JS; Schrauwen RWM; Straathof JW; Bastiaansen BAJ; Schwartz MP; Hazen WL; Alkhalaf A; Allajar D; Hadithi M; van der Spek BW; Heine DGDN; Tan ACITL; de Graaf W; Boonstra JJ; Voogd FJ; Roomer R; de Ridder RJJ; Kievit W; Siersema PD; Didden P; van Geenen EJM;
Trials; 2021 Jan; 22(1):63. PubMed ID: 33461579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of margin thermal treatment after EMR of giant (≥40 mm) colorectal lateral spreading lesions.
Nader SM; Lahr RE; Rex DK
Gastrointest Endosc; 2023 Mar; 97(3):544-548. PubMed ID: 36306831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Endoscopic mucosal resection-precutting
Zhang XQ; Sang JZ; Xu L; Mao XL; Li B; Zhu WL; Yang XY; Yu CH
World J Gastroenterol; 2022 Dec; 28(45):6397-6409. PubMed ID: 36533110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcomes of Thermal Ablation of the Mucosal Defect Margin After Endoscopic Mucosal Resection: A Prospective, International, Multicenter Trial of 1000 Large Nonpedunculated Colorectal Polyps.
Sidhu M; Shahidi N; Gupta S; Desomer L; Vosko S; Arnout van Hattem W; Hourigan LF; Lee EYT; Moss A; Raftopoulos S; Heitman SJ; Williams SJ; Zanati S; Tate DJ; Burgess N; Bourke MJ
Gastroenterology; 2021 Jul; 161(1):163-170.e3. PubMed ID: 33798525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Outcomes of EMR of defiant colorectal lesions directed to an endoscopy referral center.
Buchner AM; Guarner-Argente C; Ginsberg GG
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Aug; 76(2):255-63. PubMed ID: 22657404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tip-in endoscopic mucosal resection for large colorectal sessile polyps.
Sato Y; Ozawa SI; Yasuda H; Kato M; Kiyokawa H; Yamashita M; Matsuo Y; Yamamoto H; Itoh F
Surg Endosc; 2021 Apr; 35(4):1820-1826. PubMed ID: 32356110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Recurrence rates after endoscopic resection of large colorectal polyps: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Rotermund C; Djinbachian R; Taghiakbari M; Enderle MD; Eickhoff A; von Renteln D
World J Gastroenterol; 2022 Aug; 28(29):4007-4018. PubMed ID: 36157546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Snare tip soft coagulation (STSC) after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of large (> 20 mm) non pedunculated colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chandan S; Facciorusso A; Ramai D; Deliwala S; Mohan BP; Kassab LL; Draganov PV; Othman MO; Kochhar GS
Endosc Int Open; 2022 Jan; 10(1):E74-E81. PubMed ID: 35047337
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Effectiveness and safety of cold snare polypectomy and cold endoscopic mucosal resection for nonpedunculated colorectal polyps of 10-19 mm: a multicenter observational cohort study.
Mangira D; Raftopoulos S; Vogrin S; Hartley I; Mack A; Gazelakis K; Nalankilli K; Trinh A; Metz AJ; Appleyard M; Grimpen F; Elliott T; Brown G; Moss A
Endoscopy; 2023 Jul; 55(7):627-635. PubMed ID: 36750222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analyzing methods for reducing recurrence rates after EMR of large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps: an indirect pairwise comparison.
Radadiya D; Desai M; Patel H; Srinivasan S; Chandrasekar VT; Hassan C; Repici A; Rex D; Sharma P
Gastrointest Endosc; 2024 Mar; 99(3):326-336.e6. PubMed ID: 38065513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Endoscopic techniques to reduce recurrence rates after colorectal EMR: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kemper G; Turan AS; Schoon EJ; Schrauwen RWM; Epping LSM; Gerges C; Beyna T; Neuhaus H; Gündug U; Siersema PD; van Geenen EJM;
Surg Endosc; 2021 Oct; 35(10):5422-5429. PubMed ID: 34076765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection is associated with fewer recurrences and earlier curative resections compared to conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large colorectal polyps.
Schenck RJ; Jahann DA; Patrie JT; Stelow EB; Cox DG; Uppal DS; Sauer BG; Shami VM; Strand DS; Wang AY
Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4174-4183. PubMed ID: 28342125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficacy and histologic accuracy of underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large (>20 mm) colorectal polyps: a comparative review and meta-analysis.
Chandan S; Khan SR; Kumar A; Mohan BP; Ramai D; Kassab LL; Draganov PV; Othman MO; Kochhar GS
Gastrointest Endosc; 2021 Sep; 94(3):471-482.e9. PubMed ID: 33385463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
