These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

53 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3836994)

  • 1. The effects of multitalker and masker noise on fundamental frequency variability during spontaneous speech for children and adults.
    Rivers C; Rastatter MP
    J Aud Res; 1985 Jan; 25(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 3836994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of short-term auditory masking on fundamental frequency variability.
    Rastatter M; Rivers C
    J Aud Res; 1983 Jan; 23(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 6677636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of auditory masking by white noise on variability of fundamental frequency during highly similar productions of spontaneous speech.
    Loren CA; Colcord RD; Rastatter MP
    Percept Mot Skills; 1986 Dec; 63(3):1203-6. PubMed ID: 3808895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Establishment of age-specific normative data for the canadian French version of the hearing in noise test for children.
    Vaillancourt V; Laroche C; Giguère C; Soli SD
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):453-66. PubMed ID: 18349705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of auditory masking by white noise on primary stressing during spontaneous speech.
    Colcord RD; Loren CA; Rastatter M
    Percept Mot Skills; 1986 Dec; 63(3):1217-8. PubMed ID: 3808897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of masker modulation depth on speech masking release.
    Gnansia D; Jourdes V; Lorenzi C
    Hear Res; 2008 May; 239(1-2):60-8. PubMed ID: 18434049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Understanding speech in noise after correction of congenital unilateral aural atresia: effects of age in the emergence of binaural squelch but not in use of head-shadow.
    Gray L; Kesser B; Cole E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Sep; 73(9):1281-7. PubMed ID: 19581007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multitalker speech perception with ideal time-frequency segregation: effects of voice characteristics and number of talkers.
    Brungart DS; Chang PS; Simpson BD; Wang D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):4006-22. PubMed ID: 19507982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Binaural advantage for younger and older adults with normal hearing.
    Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB; Horwitz AR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Apr; 51(2):539-56. PubMed ID: 18367695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
    Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech production modifications produced in the presence of low-pass and high-pass filtered noise.
    Lu Y; Cooke M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Sep; 126(3):1495-9. PubMed ID: 19739762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Callsign Acquisition Test (CAT): speech intelligibility in noise.
    Rao MD; Letowski T
    Ear Hear; 2006 Apr; 27(2):120-8. PubMed ID: 16518140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of speech noise on vocal fundamental frequency using power spectral analysis.
    Lee GS; Hsiao TY; Yang CC; Kuo TB
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):343-50. PubMed ID: 17485983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relationship between masking levels and phonatory stability in normal-speaking women.
    Ferrand CT
    J Voice; 2006 Jun; 20(2):223-8. PubMed ID: 16157468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LISN-S).
    Cameron S; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):196-211. PubMed ID: 17496671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: effects of hearing loss and presentation level.
    Summers V; Molis MR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Apr; 47(2):245-56. PubMed ID: 15157127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comfortable effort level in young children's speech.
    Brown WS; Shrivastav R
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2007; 59(5):227-33. PubMed ID: 17726325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.