These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38370172)

  • 21. Entropy Generation Analysis and Thermodynamic Optimization of Jet Impingement Cooling Using Large Eddy Simulation.
    Ries F; Li Y; Nishad K; Janicka J; Sadiki A
    Entropy (Basel); 2019 Jan; 21(2):. PubMed ID: 33266845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Computational Fluid Dynamics Turbulence Model and Experimental Study for a Fontan Cavopulmonary Assist Device.
    Sarfare S; Ali MS; Palazzolo A; Rodefeld M; Conover T; Figliola R; Giridharan G; Wampler R; Bennett E; Ivashchenko A
    J Biomech Eng; 2023 Nov; 145(11):. PubMed ID: 37535439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of computational fluid dynamics models for predicting pediatric upper airway airflow characteristics.
    Chen Y; Feng X; Shi X; Cai W; Li B; Zhao Y
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2023 Jan; 61(1):259-270. PubMed ID: 36369608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Relaminarization by Steady Modification of the Streamwise Velocity Profile in a Pipe.
    Kühnen J; Scarselli D; Schaner M; Hof B
    Flow Turbul Combust; 2018; 100(4):919-943. PubMed ID: 30069145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Numerical analysis of the effect of turbulence transition on the hemodynamic parameters in human coronary arteries.
    Mahalingam A; Gawandalkar UU; Kini G; Buradi A; Araki T; Ikeda N; Nicolaides A; Laird JR; Saba L; Suri JS
    Cardiovasc Diagn Ther; 2016 Jun; 6(3):208-20. PubMed ID: 27280084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Numerical modeling of pulsatile turbulent flow in stenotic vessels.
    Varghese SS; Frankel SH
    J Biomech Eng; 2003 Aug; 125(4):445-60. PubMed ID: 12968569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Recommendations for Simulating Microparticle Deposition at Conditions Similar to the Upper Airways with Two-Equation Turbulence Models.
    Bass K; Longest PW
    J Aerosol Sci; 2018 May; 119():31-50. PubMed ID: 30349146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Impact of the TiO₂ Nanosolution Concentration on Heat Transfer Enhancement of the Twin Impingement Jet of a Heated Aluminum Plate.
    Faris Abdullah M; Zulkifli R; Harun Z; Abdullah S; Wan Ghopa WA; Soheil Najm A; Humam Sulaiman N
    Micromachines (Basel); 2019 Mar; 10(3):. PubMed ID: 30866409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. On the accuracy of RANS simulations with DNS data.
    Poroseva SV; Colmenares F JD; Murman SM
    Phys Fluids (1994); 2016 Nov; 28(11):. PubMed ID: 30271109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Modeling of gasper-induced jet flow and its impact on cabin air quality.
    Shi Z; Chen J; You R; Chen C; Chen Q
    Energy Build; 2016 Sep; 127():700-713. PubMed ID: 32288117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Computational modeling and validation of human nasal airflow under various breathing conditions.
    Li C; Jiang J; Dong H; Zhao K
    J Biomech; 2017 Nov; 64():59-68. PubMed ID: 28893392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Validation of a closing procedure for fourth-order RANS turbulence models with DNS data in an incompressible zero-pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layer.
    Poroseva SV; Kaiser BE; Sillero JA; Murman SM
    Int J Heat Fluid Flow; 2015 Dec; 56():71-79. PubMed ID: 30220749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Computational fluid dynamics analysis of cyclist aerodynamics: performance of different turbulence-modelling and boundary-layer modelling approaches.
    Defraeye T; Blocken B; Koninckx E; Hespel P; Carmeliet J
    J Biomech; 2010 Aug; 43(12):2281-7. PubMed ID: 20488446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Validation of computational fluid dynamics methodology used for human upper airway flow simulations.
    Mylavarapu G; Murugappan S; Mihaescu M; Kalra M; Khosla S; Gutmark E
    J Biomech; 2009 Jul; 42(10):1553-1559. PubMed ID: 19501360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Simulation at Mach 2 flow of ethylene/air reacting mixture within a cavity flame holder.
    Chapman Z; Peterson D; Doom J
    Heliyon; 2024 Feb; 10(3):e24961. PubMed ID: 38318000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Anisotropic source modelling for turbulent jet noise prediction.
    Xu X; Li X
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2019 Dec; 377(2159):20190075. PubMed ID: 31607245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The assessment of two different pollutants dispersion from a coal-fired power plant for various thermal regimes.
    Issakhov A; Mashenkova A
    J Environ Health Sci Eng; 2021 Jun; 19(1):959-983. PubMed ID: 34150285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. On the inconsistencies related to prediction of flow into an enclosing hood obstructed by a worker.
    Karaismail E; Celik I
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2010 Jun; 7(6):315-25. PubMed ID: 20358453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Turbulence Model Comparative Study for Complex Phenomena in Supersonic Steam Ejectors with Double Choking Mode.
    Li Y; Niu C; Shen S; Mu X; Zhang L
    Entropy (Basel); 2022 Aug; 24(9):. PubMed ID: 36141100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Scale resolving simulations of the effect of glottis motion and the laryngeal jet on flow dynamics during respiration.
    Emmerling J; Vahaji S; Morton DAV; Fletcher DF; Inthavong K
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2024 Apr; 247():108064. PubMed ID: 38382308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.