These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38370747)

  • 1. WAVELET-BASED AUTOMATIC PECTORAL MUSCLE SEGMENTATION FOR MAMMOGRAMS.
    White B; Harrow A; Cinelli C; Batchelder K; Khalil A
    medRxiv; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38370747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A robust method for segmenting pectoral muscle in mediolateral oblique (MLO) mammograms.
    Yin K; Yan S; Song C; Zheng B
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2019 Feb; 14(2):237-248. PubMed ID: 30288698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automated pectoral muscle identification on MLO-view mammograms: Comparison of deep neural network to conventional computer vision.
    Ma X; Wei J; Zhou C; Helvie MA; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Lu Y
    Med Phys; 2019 May; 46(5):2103-2114. PubMed ID: 30771257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automatic pectoral muscle segmentation on mediolateral oblique view mammograms.
    Kwok SM; Chandrasekhar R; Attikiouzel Y; Rickard MT
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Sep; 23(9):1129-40. PubMed ID: 15377122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robust Automatic Pectoral Muscle Segmentation from Mammograms Using Texture Gradient and Euclidean Distance Regression.
    Bora VB; Kothari AG; Keskar AG
    J Digit Imaging; 2016 Feb; 29(1):115-25. PubMed ID: 26259521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Geometry-Based Pectoral Muscle Segmentation From MLO Mammogram Views.
    Taghanaki SA; Liu Y; Miles B; Hamarneh G
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Nov; 64(11):2662-2671. PubMed ID: 28129144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detection and Segmentation of Pectoral Muscle on MLO-View Mammogram Using Enhancement Filter.
    Vikhe PS; Thool VR
    J Med Syst; 2017 Oct; 41(12):190. PubMed ID: 29071592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison between two packages for pectoral muscle removal on mammographic images.
    Sansone M; Marrone S; Di Salvio G; Belfiore MP; Gatta G; Fusco R; Vanore L; Zuiani C; Grassi F; Vietri MT; Granata V; Grassi R
    Radiol Med; 2022 Aug; 127(8):848-856. PubMed ID: 35816260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Segmentation and detection of breast cancer in mammograms combining wavelet analysis and genetic algorithm.
    Pereira DC; Ramos RP; do Nascimento MZ
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2014 Apr; 114(1):88-101. PubMed ID: 24513228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fully automated breast boundary and pectoral muscle segmentation in mammograms.
    Rampun A; Morrow PJ; Scotney BW; Winder J
    Artif Intell Med; 2017 Jun; 79():28-41. PubMed ID: 28606722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Location of mammograms ROI's and reduction of false-positive.
    Salazar-Licea LA; Pedraza-Ortega JC; Pastrana-Palma A; Aceves-Fernandez MA
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 May; 143():97-111. PubMed ID: 28391823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Wavelet-based 3D reconstruction of microcalcification clusters from two mammographic views: new evidence that fractal tumors are malignant and Euclidean tumors are benign.
    Batchelder KA; Tanenbaum AB; Albert S; Guimond L; Kestener P; Arneodo A; Khalil A
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(9):e107580. PubMed ID: 25222610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimation of breast percent density in raw and processed full field digital mammography images via adaptive fuzzy c-means clustering and support vector machine segmentation.
    Keller BM; Nathan DL; Wang Y; Zheng Y; Gee JC; Conant EF; Kontos D
    Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):4903-17. PubMed ID: 22894417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automated mammographic breast density estimation using a fully convolutional network.
    Lee J; Nishikawa RM
    Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 45(3):1178-1190. PubMed ID: 29363774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pectoral muscle removal in mammogram images: A novel approach for improved accuracy and efficiency.
    Chen S; Bennett DL; Colditz GA; Jiang S
    Cancer Causes Control; 2024 Jan; 35(1):185-191. PubMed ID: 37676616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automatic Detection of Pectoral Muscle Region for Computer-Aided Diagnosis Using MIAS Mammograms.
    Yoon WB; Oh JE; Chae EY; Kim HH; Lee SY; Kim KG
    Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():5967580. PubMed ID: 27847817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computer-aided identification of the pectoral muscle in digitized mammograms.
    Camilus KS; Govindan VK; Sathidevi PS
    J Digit Imaging; 2010 Oct; 23(5):562-80. PubMed ID: 19816741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A deblocking technique for block-transform compressed image using wavelet transform modulus maxima.
    Hsung TC; Pak-Kong Lun D; Siu WC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 1998; 7(10):1488-96. PubMed ID: 18276215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automatic extraction of pectoral muscle in the MLO view of mammograms.
    Feudjio CK; Klein J; Tiedeu A; Colot O
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Dec; 58(23):8493-515. PubMed ID: 24240510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Breast Dense Tissue Segmentation with Noisy Labels: A Hybrid Threshold-Based and Mask-Based Approach.
    Larroza A; Pérez-Benito FJ; Perez-Cortes JC; Román M; Pollán M; Pérez-Gómez B; Salas-Trejo D; Casals M; Llobet R
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2022 Jul; 12(8):. PubMed ID: 36010173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.