164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38371198)
1. Evaluation of Proclarix in the diagnostic work-up of prostate cancer.
Kaufmann B; Fischer S; Athanasiou A; Lautenbach N; Wittig A; Bieri U; Schmid FA; von Stauffenberg F; Scherer T; Eberli D; Gorin MA; Schiess R; Poyet C
BJUI Compass; 2024 Mar; 5(2):297-303. PubMed ID: 38371198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Who with suspected prostate cancer can benefit from Proclarix after multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging?
Morote J; Campistol M; Regis L; Celma A; de Torres I; Semidey ME; Roche S; Mast R; Santamaria A; Planas J; Trilla E
Int J Biol Markers; 2022 Jun; 37(2):218-223. PubMed ID: 35200058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improving the Early Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Men in the Challenging Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System 3 Category.
Morote J; Campistol M; Triquell M; Celma A; Regis L; de Torres I; Semidey ME; Mast R; Santamaria A; Planas J; Trilla E
Eur Urol Open Sci; 2022 Mar; 37():38-44. PubMed ID: 35243388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Proclarix, PSA Density and MRI-ERSPC Risk Calculator to Select Patients for Prostate Biopsy after mpMRI.
Campistol M; Morote J; Triquell M; Regis L; Celma A; de Torres I; Semidey ME; Mast R; Santamaría A; Planas J; Trilla E
Cancers (Basel); 2022 May; 14(11):. PubMed ID: 35681685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accurate diagnosis of prostate cancer by combining Proclarix with magnetic resonance imaging.
Morote J; Pye H; Campistol M; Celma A; Regis L; Semidey M; de Torres I; Mast R; Planas J; Santamaria A; Trilla E; Athanasiou A; Singh S; Heavey S; Stopka-Farooqui U; Freeman A; Haider A; Schiess R; Whitaker HC; Punwani S; Ahmed HU; Emberton M
BJU Int; 2023 Aug; 132(2):188-195. PubMed ID: 36855895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. PROPOSe: A Real-life Prospective Study of Proclarix, a Novel Blood-based Test to Support Challenging Biopsy Decision-making in Prostate Cancer.
Steuber T; Heidegger I; Kafka M; Roeder MA; Chun F; Preisser F; Palisaar RJ; Hanske J; Budaeus L; Schiess R; Keller T; Semjonow A; Hammerer P; Manka L; Ecke T; Schwentner C; Ohlmann C
Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Jun; 5(3):321-327. PubMed ID: 33422560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Added Value of Prostate-specific Antigen Density in Selecting Prostate Biopsy Candidates Among Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen and PI-RADS ≥3 Lesions on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate: A Systematic Assessment by PI-RADS Score.
Pellegrino F; Stabile A; Sorce G; Quarta L; Robesti D; Cannoletta D; Cirulli G; Barletta F; Scuderi S; Mazzone E; de Angelis M; Brembilla G; De Cobelli F; Salonia A; Montorsi F; Briganti A; Gandaglia G
Eur Urol Focus; 2023 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 37865591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prostate cancer detection rate in men undergoing transperineal template-guided saturation and targeted prostate biopsy.
Kaufmann B; Saba K; Schmidli TS; Stutz S; Bissig L; Britschgi AJ; Schaeren E; Gu A; Langenegger N; Sulser T; Eberli D; Keller EX; Hermanns T; Poyet C
Prostate; 2022 Feb; 82(3):388-396. PubMed ID: 34914121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Proclarix, A New Biomarker for the Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.
Campistol M; Morote J; Regis L; Celma A; Planas J; Trilla E
Mol Diagn Ther; 2022 May; 26(3):273-281. PubMed ID: 35471698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How to make clinical decisions to avoid unnecessary prostate screening in biopsy-naïve men with PI-RADs v2 score ≤ 3?
Zhang Y; Zeng N; Zhang F; Huang Y; Tian Y
Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 Jan; 25(1):175-186. PubMed ID: 31473884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Creating a novel multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-based biopsy strategy for reducing unnecessary prostate biopsies: a retrospective cohort study.
Wang C; Shen D; Yuan L; Dong Q; Xu S; Liu Y; Xiao J
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2024 Feb; 14(2):2021-2033. PubMed ID: 38415121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MRI combined with PSA density in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with PSA serum levels of 4∼10ng/mL: Biparametric versus multiparametric MRI.
Han C; Liu S; Qin XB; Ma S; Zhu LN; Wang XY
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2020 Apr; 101(4):235-244. PubMed ID: 32063483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. New strategy for the identification of prostate cancer: The combination of Proclarix and the prostate health index.
Terracciano D; La Civita E; Athanasiou A; Liotti A; Fiorenza M; Cennamo M; Crocetto F; Tennstedt P; Schiess R; Haese A; Ferro M; Steuber T
Prostate; 2022 Nov; 82(15):1469-1476. PubMed ID: 35971798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predictors of prostate cancer detection in MRI PI-RADS 3 lesions - Reality of a tertiary center.
Araújo D; Gromicho A; Dias J; Bastos S; Maciel RM; Sabença A; Xambre L
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2023 Dec; 95(4):11830. PubMed ID: 38117217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Efficacy of Proclarix to Select Appropriate Candidates for Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Derived Prostate Biopsies in Men with Suspected Prostate Cancer.
Morote J; Campistol M; Celma A; Regis L; de Torres I; Semidey ME; Roche S; Mast R; Santamaría A; Planas J; Trilla E
World J Mens Health; 2022 Apr; 40(2):270-279. PubMed ID: 35021312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection After a Negative Prebiopsy MRI Examination: Comparison of Biparametric Versus Multiparametric MRI.
Gan JM; Kikano EG; Smith DA; Rao S; Podury R; Wang M; Durieux JC; Paspulati RM; Ponsky L; Ramaiya NH; Tirumani SH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 May; 218(5):859-866. PubMed ID: 34817189
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Combining clinical and MRI data to manage PI-RADS 3 lesions and reduce excessive biopsy.
Yang S; Zhao W; Tan S; Zhang Y; Wei C; Chen T; Shen J
Transl Androl Urol; 2020 Jun; 9(3):1252-1261. PubMed ID: 32676408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Do all patients with suspicious prostate cancer need Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging before prostate biopsy?
Teixeira Anacleto S; Neves Alberto J; Carvalho Dias E; Sousa Passos P; Cerqueira Alves M
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2022 Mar; 94(1):32-36. PubMed ID: 35352522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimal PSA density threshold and predictive factors for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in patient with a PI-RADS 3 lesion on MRI.
Nguyen TA; Fourcade A; Zambon A; Saout K; Deruelle C; Joulin V; Tissot V; Doucet L; Rozet F; Fournier G; Valeri A
Urol Oncol; 2023 Aug; 41(8):354.e11-354.e18. PubMed ID: 37391283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How to optimize follow-up in patients with a suspicious multiparametric MRI and a subsequent negative targeted prostate biopsy. Results from a large, single-institution series.
Barletta F; Stabile A; Mazzone E; Brembilla G; Sorce G; Pellegrino F; Scuderi S; Cannoletta D; Cirulli GO; Cucchiara V; Gandaglia G; De Cobelli F; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Urol Oncol; 2022 Mar; 40(3):103.e17-103.e24. PubMed ID: 34688534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
