These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38372015)

  • 1. Evaluating the quality of systematic reviews of comparative studies in autograft-based anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the AMSTAR-2 tool: A systematic umbrella review.
    Sritharan P; Milantoni V; Abdel Khalik H; Kay J; Slawaska-Eng D; Johnson J; de Sa D
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2024 Mar; 32(3):583-598. PubMed ID: 38372015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Methodological assessment and overall confidence in the results of systematic reviews with network meta-analyses in Endodontics.
    Nagendrababu V; Faggion CM; Pulikkotil SJ; Alatta A; Dummer PMH
    Int Endod J; 2022 May; 55(5):393-404. PubMed ID: 35080025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair Augmented With Dynamic Intraligamentary Stabilization Is Equivalent to Hamstring Autograft Reconstruction at Short- and Mid-Term Follow-Up: A Systematic Review.
    Ambrosio L; Franco D; Vadalà G; Russo F; Papalia R
    Arthroscopy; 2024 Jul; 40(7):2121-2131.e1. PubMed ID: 38417640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Insufficient evidence to support peroneus longus tendon over other autografts for primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review.
    Marín Fermín T; Hovsepian JM; Symeonidis PD; Terzidis I; Papakostas ET
    J ISAKOS; 2021 May; 6(3):161-169. PubMed ID: 34006580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Autograft Versus Allograft in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Systematic Review of Overlapping Systematic Reviews.
    Zeng C; Gao SG; Li H; Yang T; Luo W; Li YS; Lei GH
    Arthroscopy; 2016 Jan; 32(1):153-63.e18. PubMed ID: 26474743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Association between cardiovascular diseases and apical periodontitis: an umbrella review.
    Jakovljevic A; Duncan HF; Nagendrababu V; Jacimovic J; Milasin J; Dummer PMH
    Int Endod J; 2020 Oct; 53(10):1374-1386. PubMed ID: 32648971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contralateral hamstring autografts do not provide benefit compared to ipsilateral hamstring autografts in primary or revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review.
    Vivekanantha P; Nedaie S; Hassan Z; Abdel Khalik H; Carsen S; Nagai K; Hoshino Y; de Sa D
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2023 Dec; 31(12):5641-5651. PubMed ID: 37864773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Overlapping systematic reviews of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction comparing hamstring autograft with bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft: why are they different?
    Poolman RW; Abouali JA; Conter HJ; Bhandari M
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Jul; 89(7):1542-52. PubMed ID: 17606794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Overall confidence in the results of systematic reviews on exercise therapy for chronic low back pain: a cross-sectional analysis using the Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) 2 tool.
    Almeida MO; Yamato TP; Parreira PDCS; Costa LOP; Kamper S; Saragiotto BT
    Braz J Phys Ther; 2020; 24(2):103-117. PubMed ID: 31113734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is remnant preservation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction superior to the standard technique? An overview of systematic reviews.
    Zhang Y; Xiao X; Deng W; Wang J; Gao H; Han J
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2023 Nov; 24(1):910. PubMed ID: 38001516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patellar tendon versus artificial grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Fan D; Ma J; Zhang L
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2021 Aug; 16(1):478. PubMed ID: 34348750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quadriceps Tendon Versus Hamstring Tendon Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Tan TK; Subramaniam AG; Ebert JR; Radic R
    Am J Sports Med; 2022 Dec; 50(14):3974-3986. PubMed ID: 34470509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is there a higher failure rate of allografts compared with autografts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses.
    Mascarenhas R; Erickson BJ; Sayegh ET; Verma NN; Cole BJ; Bush-Joseph C; Bach BR
    Arthroscopy; 2015 Feb; 31(2):364-72. PubMed ID: 25220350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Combining an Anterolateral Complex Procedure With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Reduces the Graft Reinjury Rate and Improves Clinical Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Bosco F; Giustra F; Masoni V; Capella M; Sciannameo V; Camarda L; Massè A; LaPrade RF
    Am J Sports Med; 2024 Jul; 52(8):2129-2147. PubMed ID: 38353002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Comparison of Quadriceps Tendon Autograft With Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft and Hamstring Tendon Autograft for Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Quantitative Synthesis.
    Ajrawat P; Dwyer T; Whelan D; Theodoropoulos J; Murnaghan L; Bhargava M; Ogilvie-Harris D; Chahal J
    Clin J Sport Med; 2021 Jul; 31(4):392-399. PubMed ID: 31233432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing Hamstring Autograft With Hybrid Graft for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.
    Belk JW; Kraeutler MJ; Houck DA; Smith JR; McCarty EC
    Arthroscopy; 2020 Apr; 36(4):1189-1201. PubMed ID: 31919024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Consistent Indications and Good Outcomes Despite High Variability in Techniques for Two-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.
    Gopinatth V; Casanova FJ; Knapik DM; Mameri ES; Jackson GR; Khan ZA; McCormick JR; Yanke AB; Cole BJ; Chahla J
    Arthroscopy; 2023 Sep; 39(9):2098-2111. PubMed ID: 36863622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lower donor site morbidity with hamstring and quadriceps tendon autograft compared with bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Kunze KN; Moran J; Polce EM; Pareek A; Strickland SM; Williams RJ
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2023 Aug; 31(8):3339-3352. PubMed ID: 37000243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Closure of the Quadriceps Tendon Autograft Harvest Site for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.
    Cole WW; Saraf SM; Stamm M; Mulcahey MK
    Am J Sports Med; 2023 Jul; 51(9):2498-2505. PubMed ID: 35658629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.