These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38372689)

  • 1. The Kappa Paradox Explained.
    Derksen BM; Bruinsma W; Goslings JC; Schep NWL
    J Hand Surg Am; 2024 May; 49(5):482-485. PubMed ID: 38372689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Quality criteria of assessment scales--Cohen's kappa as measure of interrator reliability (1)].
    Mayer H; Nonn C; Osterbrink J; Evers GC
    Pflege; 2004 Feb; 17(1):36-46. PubMed ID: 15040245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of two classification systems for intra-articular calcaneal fractures.
    Lauder AJ; Inda DJ; Bott AM; Clare MP; Fitzgibbons TC; Mormino MA
    Foot Ankle Int; 2006 Apr; 27(4):251-5. PubMed ID: 16624214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The prediction of pouch of Douglas obliteration using offline analysis of the transvaginal ultrasound 'sliding sign' technique: inter- and intra-observer reproducibility.
    Reid S; Lu C; Casikar I; Mein B; Magotti R; Ludlow J; Benzie R; Condous G
    Hum Reprod; 2013 May; 28(5):1237-46. PubMed ID: 23482338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of inter- and intra-observer reliability of current classification systems for subtrochanteric femoral fractures.
    İmerci A; Aydogan NH; Tosun K
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2018 Apr; 28(3):499-502. PubMed ID: 29110093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability of a classification of fractures of the hand based on the AO comprehensive classification system.
    Szwebel JD; Ehlinger V; Pinsolle V; Bruneteau P; Pélissier P; Salmi LR
    J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2010 Jun; 35(5):392-5. PubMed ID: 20100711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Inter-observer reliability and intra-observer reproducibility of the Weber classification of ankle fractures.
    Malek IA; Machani B; Mevcha AM; Hyder NH
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Sep; 88(9):1204-6. PubMed ID: 16943473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinicians are right not to like Cohen's κ.
    de Vet HC; Mokkink LB; Terwee CB; Hoekstra OS; Knol DL
    BMJ; 2013 Apr; 346():f2125. PubMed ID: 23585065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Kappa statistics in the assessment of observer variation: the significance of multiple observers classifying ankle fractures.
    Thomsen NO; Olsen LH; Nielsen ST
    J Orthop Sci; 2002; 7(2):163-6. PubMed ID: 11956974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Observer variation in the radiographic classification of ankle fractures.
    Thomsen NO; Overgaard S; Olsen LH; Hansen H; Nielsen ST
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1991 Jul; 73(4):676-8. PubMed ID: 2071659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do thoraco-lumbar spinal injuries classification systems exhibit lower inter- and intra-observer agreement than other fractures classifications?: A comparison using fractures of the trochanteric area of the proximal femur as contrast model.
    Urrutia J; Zamora T; Klaber I; Carmona M; Palma J; Campos M; Yurac R
    Injury; 2016 Apr; 47(4):859-64. PubMed ID: 26653269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inter- and intraobserver agreement on the Load Sharing Classification of thoracolumbar spine fractures.
    Elzinga M; Segers M; Siebenga J; Heilbron E; de Lange-de Klerk ES; Bakker F
    Injury; 2012 Apr; 43(4):416-22. PubMed ID: 21645896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inter- and intraobserver reliability and critical analysis of the FFP classification of osteoporotic pelvic ring injuries.
    Krappinger D; Kaser V; Kammerlander C; Neuerburg C; Merkel A; Lindtner RA
    Injury; 2019 Feb; 50(2):337-343. PubMed ID: 30482410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How reliable are chance-corrected measures of agreement?
    Guggenmoos-Holzmann I
    Stat Med; 1993 Dec; 12(23):2191-205. PubMed ID: 8310189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability and validity of the Unified Classification System for postoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures around cemented polished taper-slip stems.
    Jain S; Mohrir G; Townsend O; Lamb JN; Palan J; Aderinto J; Pandit H
    Bone Joint J; 2021 Aug; 103-B(8):1339-1344. PubMed ID: 34334039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability in the load sharing classification of the assessment of thoracolumbar burst fractures.
    Dai LY; Jin WJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Feb; 30(3):354-8. PubMed ID: 15682019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validity of classification of distal radial fractures in the Swedish fracture register.
    Bergvall M; Bergdahl C; Ekholm C; Wennergren D
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Jun; 22(1):587. PubMed ID: 34174861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of three radiological classification systems for intra-articular calcaneal fractures.
    Sayed-Noor AS; Agren PH; Wretenberg P
    Foot Ankle Int; 2011 Sep; 32(9):861-6. PubMed ID: 22097161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Inter-rater reliability of physical abuse determinations in young children with fractures.
    Buesser KE; Leventhal JM; Gaither JR; Tate V; Cooperman DR; Moles RL; Silva CT; Ehrlich LJ; Sharkey MS
    Child Abuse Negl; 2017 Oct; 72():140-146. PubMed ID: 28802910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interobserver agreement: Cohen's kappa coefficient does not necessarily reflect the percentage of patients with congruent classifications.
    Steinijans VW; Diletti E; Bömches B; Greis C; Solleder P
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1997 Mar; 35(3):93-5. PubMed ID: 9088995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.