These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38373442)

  • 1. Online Resources for Robin Sequence; an Analysis of Readability.
    Browne R; Hurley CM; Carr S; de Blacam C
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2024 Feb; ():10556656241234587. PubMed ID: 38373442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Readability of Online Information Regarding Hip Osteoarthritis.
    Lim B; Chai A; Shaalan M
    Cureus; 2024 May; 16(5):e60536. PubMed ID: 38887325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lower Back Pain Imaging: A Readability Analysis.
    Valentine MJ; Cottone G; Kramer HD; Kayastha A; Kim J; Pettinelli NJ; Kramer RC
    Cureus; 2023 Sep; 15(9):e45174. PubMed ID: 37842495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.
    Huang G; Fang CH; Agarwal N; Bhagat N; Eloy JA; Langer PD
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 133(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 25654639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Health Literacy in Clubfoot: A Quantitative Assessment of the Readability, Understandability and Actionability of Online Patient Education Material.
    Skalitzky MK; Gulbrandsen TR; Lorentzen W; Gao B; Shamrock AG; Weinstein SL; Morcuende JA
    Iowa Orthop J; 2021; 41(1):61-67. PubMed ID: 34552405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing parental comprehension of online resources on childhood pain.
    Ocmen E; Erdemir I; Aksu Erdost H; Hanci V
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2024 Jun; 103(25):e38569. PubMed ID: 38905405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An Analysis of the Readability of Online Sarcoidosis Resources.
    Irshad S; Asif N; Ashraf U; Ashraf H
    Cureus; 2024 Apr; 16(4):e58559. PubMed ID: 38770494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Academic and community hernia center websites in the United States fail to meet healthcare literacy standards of readability.
    Docimo S; Seeras K; Acho R; Pryor A; Spaniolas K
    Hernia; 2022 Jun; 26(3):779-786. PubMed ID: 35344107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Quantitative Assessment of Online Patient Education Resources.
    Gulbrandsen TR; Skalitzky MK; Ryan SE; Gao B; Shamrock AG; Brown TS; Elkins JM
    Iowa Orthop J; 2022; 42(2):98-106. PubMed ID: 36601227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Readability and Quality of Online Patient Education Materials Concerning Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
    Venosa M; Cerciello S; Zoubi M; Petralia G; Vespasiani A; Angelozzi M; Romanini E; Logroscino G
    Cureus; 2024 Apr; 16(4):e58618. PubMed ID: 38770469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Readability and Suitability of Online Patient Education Materials for Glaucoma.
    Martin CA; Khan S; Lee R; Do AT; Sridhar J; Crowell EL; Bowden EC
    Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2022; 5(5):525-530. PubMed ID: 35301989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Readability and quality assessment of online patient education materials for spinal and epidural anesthesia.
    Rai R; Wiseman JJ; Chau A; Wiseman SM
    Can J Anaesth; 2024 Aug; 71(8):1092-1102. PubMed ID: 38773007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Readability and Accessibility of Patient-Education Materials for Heart Failure in the United States.
    Sharma S; Latif Z; Makuvire TT; Taylor CN; Vargas F; Abo-Sido NS; Ibrahim NE; Defilippis EM
    J Card Fail; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 39094729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantitative Readability Assessment of the Internal Medicine Online Patient Information on Annals.org.
    Abu-Heija AA; Shatta M; Ajam M; Abu-Heija U; Imran N; Levine D
    Cureus; 2019 Mar; 11(3):e4184. PubMed ID: 31106084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dyslexia Articles Unboxed: Analyzing Their Readability Level.
    Matsuura Y; Jaeah C
    J Dev Behav Pediatr; 2024 May-Jun 01; 45(3):e211-e216. PubMed ID: 38896567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Online educational materials for appendectomy patients have good quality but poor readability.
    Rai R; Landsberg A; Nguyen A; Wiseman SM
    Am J Surg; 2021 Jun; 221(6):1203-1210. PubMed ID: 33712262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Readability of Online Patient Information Relating to Cleft Palate Surgery.
    Lavin CV; Fahy EJ; Abbas DB; Griffin M; Deleon NMD; Lee DK; Khosla RK; Bruckman K; Lorenz HP; Wan DC
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2022 Mar; 59(3):330-335. PubMed ID: 33960204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing the Readability of Online Information About Hip Arthroscopy.
    Mehta MP; Swindell HW; Westermann RW; Rosneck JT; Lynch TS
    Arthroscopy; 2018 Jul; 34(7):2142-2149. PubMed ID: 29631940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Readability Analysis of Otolaryngology Consent Documents on the iMed Consent Platform.
    Hannabass K; Lee J
    Mil Med; 2023 Mar; 188(3-4):780-785. PubMed ID: 35022788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Readability analysis of online health information on preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP).
    Kecojevic A; Basch CH; Garcia P
    Public Health; 2020 May; 182():53-55. PubMed ID: 32171091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.