These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38374482)
1. A modified CEUS risk stratification model for adnexal masses with solid components: prospective multicenter study and risk adjustment. Wu M; Zhang M; Qu E; Sun X; Zhang R; Mu L; Xiao L; Wen H; Wang R; Liu T; Meng X; Wu S; Chen Y; Su M; Wang Y; Gu J; Zhang X Eur Radiol; 2024 Sep; 34(9):5978-5988. PubMed ID: 38374482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Integrating Contrast-enhanced US to O-RADS US for Classification of Adnexal Lesions with Solid Components: Time-intensity Curve Analysis versus Visual Assessment. Wu M; Wang Y; Su M; Wang R; Sun X; Zhang R; Mu L; Xiao L; Wen H; Liu T; Meng X; Huang L; Zhang X Radiol Imaging Cancer; 2024 Nov; 6(6):e240024. PubMed ID: 39392388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasonography-Based Risk Models in Differentiating Between Benign and Malignant Ovarian Tumors in a US Cohort. Yoeli-Bik R; Longman RE; Wroblewski K; Weigert M; Abramowicz JS; Lengyel E JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Jul; 6(7):e2323289. PubMed ID: 37440228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. O-RADS combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound in risk stratification of adnexal masses. Shi Y; Li H; Wu X; Li X; Yang M J Ovarian Res; 2023 Aug; 16(1):153. PubMed ID: 37537697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differentiating Benign From Malignant Ovarian Masses With Solid Components: Diagnostic Performance of CEUS Combined With IOTA Simple Rules and O-RADS. Lu B; He W; Liu C; Wang P; Yang P; Zhao Z; Qi J; Huang B Ultrasound Med Biol; 2024 Sep; 50(9):1449-1458. PubMed ID: 38876911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. External Validation of O-RADS US Risk Stratification and Management System. Hack K; Gandhi N; Bouchard-Fortier G; Chawla TP; Ferguson SE; Li S; Kahn D; Tyrrell PN; Glanc P Radiology; 2022 Jul; 304(1):114-120. PubMed ID: 35438559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance of IOTA Simple Rules, Simple Rules risk assessment, ADNEX model and O-RADS in differentiating between benign and malignant adnexal lesions in North American women. Hiett AK; Sonek JD; Guy M; Reid TJ Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2022 May; 59(5):668-676. PubMed ID: 34533862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) combined with Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) ultrasound risk stratification for adnexal masses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Yi YY; Li C; Zhu WJ; Hou YL Clin Radiol; 2024 Sep; 79(9):e1167-e1175. PubMed ID: 38942707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of O-RADS Ultrasound and O-RADS MRI for Risk Assessment of Ovarian and Adnexal Lesions. Zhang Q; Dai X; Li W AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Jul; 221(1):21-33. PubMed ID: 36722758 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of American College of Radiology Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Ultrasound (O-RADS US): Analysis on 1054 adnexal masses. Cao L; Wei M; Liu Y; Fu J; Zhang H; Huang J; Pei X; Zhou J Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Jul; 162(1):107-112. PubMed ID: 33966893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative Study of the Efficacy of the Ovarian-Adnexa Reporting and Data System Ultrasound Combined With Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and the ADNEX MR Scoring System in the Diagnosis of Adnexal Masses. Wang T; Cui W; Nie F; Huang X; Huang L; Liu L; Zhu Y; Zheng R Ultrasound Med Biol; 2023 Sep; 49(9):2072-2080. PubMed ID: 37321953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Parameters in the Evaluation of Adnexal Masses with Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Ultrasound. Xu J; Huang Z; Zeng J; Zheng Z; Cao J; Su M; Zhang X Ultrasound Med Biol; 2023 Jul; 49(7):1527-1534. PubMed ID: 37032238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does Combing O-RADS US and CA-125 Improve Diagnostic Accuracy in Assessing Adnexal Malignancy Risk in Women With Different Menopausal Status? Wu M; Wang Q; Zhang M; Cao J; Chen Y; Zheng J; Luo L; Su M; Lin X; Kuang X; Zhang X J Ultrasound Med; 2023 Feb; 42(3):675-685. PubMed ID: 35880406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the O-RADS and ADNEX models regarding malignancy rate and validity in evaluating adnexal lesions. Chen GY; Hsu TF; Chan IS; Liu CH; Chao WT; Shih YC; Jiang LY; Chang YH; Wang PH; Chen YJ Eur Radiol; 2022 Nov; 32(11):7854-7864. PubMed ID: 35583711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy and reproducibility of the O-RADS MRI risk stratification system based on enhanced non-DCE MRI in the assessment of adnexal masses. Wu M; Tang Q; Cai S; Zhu L; Lin C; Guan Y; Rao S; Zhou J Eur J Radiol; 2023 Feb; 159():110670. PubMed ID: 36584564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improving risk stratification of indeterminate adnexal masses on MRI: What imaging features help predict malignancy in O-RADS MRI 4 lesions? Wong BZY; Causa Andrieu PI; Sonoda Y; Chi DS; Aviki EM; Vargas HA; Woo S Eur J Radiol; 2023 Nov; 168():111122. PubMed ID: 37806193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance of IOTA ADNEX model in evaluating adnexal masses in a gynecological oncology center in China. Chen H; Qian L; Jiang M; Du Q; Yuan F; Feng W Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 54(6):815-822. PubMed ID: 31152572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Magnetic resonance scoring system for assessment of adnexal masses: added value of diffusion-weighted imaging including apparent diffusion coefficient map. Hottat NA; Van Pachterbeke C; Vanden Houte K; Denolin V; Jani JC; Cannie MM Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Mar; 57(3):478-487. PubMed ID: 32438461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]