172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38376029)
1. Lower constraint testing enhances the testing effect for some contextual details but not others.
Giannakopoulos KL; McCurdy MP; Sklenar AM; Frankenstein AN; Urban Levy P; Leshikar ED
Brain Behav; 2024 Jan; 14(1):e3380. PubMed ID: 38376029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Examining the episodic context account: does retrieval practice enhance memory for context?
Hong MK; Polyn SM; Fazio LK
Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2019 Dec; 4(1):46. PubMed ID: 31853762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Examining the relationship between generation constraint and memory.
McCurdy MP; Frankenstein AN; Sklenar AM; Levy PU; Leshikar ED
Mem Cognit; 2021 May; 49(4):675-691. PubMed ID: 33415716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fewer generation constraints increase the generation effect for item and source memory through enhanced relational processing.
McCurdy MP; Sklenar AM; Frankenstein AN; Leshikar ED
Memory; 2020 May; 28(5):598-616. PubMed ID: 32292105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Attention and the testing effect.
Mulligan NW; Picklesimer M
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jun; 42(6):938-50. PubMed ID: 26618913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The testing effect under divided attention.
Buchin ZL; Mulligan NW
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1934-1947. PubMed ID: 28504527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Repeated retrieval practice and item difficulty: does criterion learning eliminate item difficulty effects?
Vaughn KE; Rawson KA; Pyc MA
Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Dec; 20(6):1239-45. PubMed ID: 23589200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Retrieval practice improves memory in patients with schizophrenia: new perspectives for cognitive remediation.
Jantzi C; Mengin AC; Serfaty D; Bacon E; Elowe J; Severac F; Meyer N; Berna F; Vidailhet P
BMC Psychiatry; 2019 Nov; 19(1):355. PubMed ID: 31711448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impoverished cue support enhances subsequent retention: support for the elaborative retrieval explanation of the testing effect.
Carpenter SK; DeLosh EL
Mem Cognit; 2006 Mar; 34(2):268-76. PubMed ID: 16752591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Where and how to learn: The interactive benefits of contextual variation, restudying, and retrieval practice for learning.
Imundo MN; Pan SC; Bjork EL; Bjork RA
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Mar; 74(3):413-424. PubMed ID: 33174522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Progressive retrieval practice leads to greater memory for image-word pairs than standard retrieval practice.
Liu S; Zheng Z; Kent C; Briscoe J
Memory; 2022 Aug; 30(7):796-805. PubMed ID: 35638593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The benefit of retrieval practice on cued recall under stress depends on item difficulty.
Klier C; Buratto LG
Neurosci Lett; 2023 Feb; 797():137066. PubMed ID: 36642238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Testing enhances both encoding and retrieval for both tested and untested items.
Cho KW; Neely JH; Crocco S; Vitrano D
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Jul; 70(7):1211-1235. PubMed ID: 27049596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Test-potentiated learning: three independent replications, a disconfirmed hypothesis, and an unexpected boundary condition.
Wissman KT; Rawson KA
Memory; 2018 Apr; 26(4):406-414. PubMed ID: 28691577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Techniques for scaffolding retrieval practice: The costs and benefits of adaptive versus diminishing cues.
Fiechter JL; Benjamin AS
Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Oct; 26(5):1666-1674. PubMed ID: 31161529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Testing the primary and convergent retrieval model of recall: Recall practice produces faster recall success but also faster recall failure.
Hopper WJ; Huber DE
Mem Cognit; 2019 May; 47(4):816-841. PubMed ID: 30737729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diminishing-cues retrieval practice: A memory-enhancing technique that works when regular testing doesn't.
Fiechter JL; Benjamin AS
Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Oct; 25(5):1868-1876. PubMed ID: 28849580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Why is test-restudy practice beneficial for memory? An evaluation of the mediator shift hypothesis.
Pyc MA; Rawson KA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):737-46. PubMed ID: 22060276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of Survival Processing on Item and Context Memory: Enhanced Memory for Survival-Relevant Details.
Meyers ZR; McCurdy MP; Leach RC; Thomas AK; Leshikar ED
Front Psychol; 2020; 11():2244. PubMed ID: 33041896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Attention, the testing effect, and retrieval-induced forgetting: Distraction dissociates the positive and negative effects of retrieval on subsequent memory.
Mulligan NW; Buchin ZL; West JT
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Dec; 48(12):1905-1922. PubMed ID: 34726435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
